Service Function Chaining (SFC) BoF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well MORE INFO: -ECN.
Advertisements

SACM IETF-92 Meeting March 23 and 27, 2015 Dan Romascanu Adam Montville.
DDoS Open Threat Signaling BOF (DOTS) IETF 92, Dallas, Texas
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: ccamp Data tracker:
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: ccamp Data tracker:
ACE BOF, IETF-89 London Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) BOF Wed 09:00-11:30, Balmoral BOF Chairs: Kepeng Li, Hannes.
IETF-88 AQM WG Wesley Eddy Richard Scheffenegger
DetNet BoF Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Online Agenda and Slides at:
July 2013IETF TRILL WG1 TRILL Working Group TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links Mailing list address: Tools site:
Audio/Video Transport Extensions (AVTEXT). Administrivia Notetakers? Jabber scribe? Jabber Chat Room
Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) NVO3 Meeting, IETF 88, Vancouver Benson Schliesser Matthew Bocci
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
LMAP WG IETF 89, London, UK Dan Romascanu Jason Weil.
Dnssd WG Chairs: Tim Chown Ralph Droms IETF 89, London, 3 rd March 2014.
Wed 31 Jul & Fri 2 Aug 2013SIDR IETF 87 Berlin, German1 SIDR Working Group IETF 87 Berlin, Germany Wednesday, 31 Jul 2013 Friday, 2 Aug 2013.
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
ForCES WG Status Forwarding and Control Element Separation (IETF88 Vancouver, CA 2013) Chair: Jamal Hadi Salim Damascene.
SACM IETF-91Meeting November 10 and 14, 2014 Dan Romascanu Adam Montville.
PWE3 WG Status IETF-88 Andy Malis Matthew Bocci Secretary:
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
RADEXT WG IETF 93 Agenda July 20, Please join the Jabber room:
1 TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group Pasi Sarolahti Michael Scharf Yoshifumi Nishida IETF 90 – Toronto, Canada July 2014.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 86th IETF Tuesday, July 30, 2013 ( Berlin Local Time, GMT+2:00) Chairs: –Al Morton (acmorton(at)att.com)
CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
DetNet WG 1 ST Meeting Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Secretary: Jouni Korhonen.
Service Function Chaining (SFC) IETF 89 London WG Chairs: Jim Guichard Thomas Narten
PWE3 WG Status IETF-87 Andy Malis Matthew Bocci
Wed 31 Jul & Fri 2 Aug 2013SIDR IETF 87 Berlin, German1 SIDR Working Group IETF 87 Berlin, Germany Wednesday, 31 Jul 2013 Friday, 2 Aug 2013.
LMAP WG INTERIM DUBLIN, IRELAND Jason Weil Dan Romascanu - remote.
Virtualized Network Function (VNF) Pool BoF IETF 90 th, Toronto, Canada. BoF Chairs: Ning Zong Melinda Shore
SACM IETF 89, London, UK Dan Romascanu Adam Montville.
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 88, Vancouver Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
Interface to the Routing System (IRS) BOF IETF 85, Atlanta November 2012.
TSVWG IETF-89 (London) 5 th & 7 th March 2014 Gorry Fairhurst David Black James Polk WG chairs 1.
LMAP WG IETF 90, TORONTO, CA Dan Romascanu Jason Weil.
RADEXT WG IETF 89 Agenda March 4, Please join the Jabber room:
IS-IS WG IETF-90 Toronto Chris Hopps Hannes Gredler
Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) NVO3 Meeting, IETF 90, Toronto Benson Schliesser Matthew Bocci
DICE BOF, IETF-87 Berlin DTLS In Constrained Environments (DICE) BOF Wed 15:10-16:10, Potsdam 3 BOF Chairs: Zach Shelby, Carsten Bormann Responsible AD:
DetNet WG Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Secretary: Jouni Korhonen
1 IETF 95 Buenos Aires, AR TEAS Working Group Online Agenda and Slide: Data tracker:
Mon 23 Mar 2015SIDR IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US1 SIDR Working Group IETF 92 Dallas, TX, US Monday, 23 Mar 2015.
Chairs: Pascal Thubert Thomas Watteyne Etherpad for minutes: IPv6 over the TSCH mode.
Fri 24 Jul 2015SIDR IETF 93 Prague, CZ1 SIDR Working Group IETF 93 Prague, CZ Friday, 24 Jul 2015.
TEAS Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Data tracker:
SACM IETF 96 July 18 & 22, 2016 Adam Montville Karen O'Donoghue.
DetNet WG Chairs: Lou Berger Pat Thaler Secretary: Jouni Korhonen
Security Events (SecEvent)
May 12, 2015 Dan Romascanu Adam Montville
DetNet WG Chairs: Lou Berger
28 October 2016 Webex IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE e
MMUSIC Virtual Interim June 17, 2013
SACM Virtual Interim Meeting
24 June 2016 Webex IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE e Chairs:
DetNet WG Chairs: Lou Berger
TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group Status
IETF 97th SUPA Working Group
Service Function Chaining (SFC)
15th November 2016 Gorry Fairhurst (via webrtc) David Black WG chairs
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB
SACM Virtual Interim Meeting
CONEX BoF.
IETF 97 Seoul MBONED.
Network Virtualization Overlays (NVO3) Working Group IETF 101, March 2018, London Chairs: Secretary: Sam Aldrin Matthew Bocci.
TEAS Working Group IETF 97 Seoul Online Agenda and Slide:
Joint MPLS, PCE, TEAS and CCAMP WGs (hosted by CCAMP)
Service Function Chaining (SFC)
Common Operations and Management on network Slices (coms) BoF
Software Updates for Internet of Things (SUIT) WG
IETF 98 pim wg meeting.
Presentation transcript:

Service Function Chaining (SFC) BoF IETF 88 Vancouver, British Columbia BOF Chairs: Jim Guichard (jguichar@cisco.com) Thomas Narten (narten@us.ibm.com)

Note Well This summary is only meant to point you in the right direction, and doesn't have all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set forth in BCP 79; please read it carefully. The brief summary: By participating with the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes. If you are aware that a contribution of yours (something you write, say, or discuss in any IETF context) is covered by patents or patent applications, you must disclose that fact. You understand that meetings might be recorded, broadcast, photographed, and publicly archived. For further information, talk to a chair, ask an Area Director, or review the following: BCP 9 (on the Internet Standards Process) BCP 25 (on the Working Group processes) BCP 78 (on the IETF Trust) BCP 79 (on Intellectual Property Rights in the IETF)

Agenda Agenda Bashing BOF Scope and Purpose Overview: Problem Statement Overview: Use Cases and Requirements Overview: Architecture/Framework Draft Charter (for a possible SFC WG) Obvious Questions Discussion (all) Summary and Closure

Agenda (Detailed) Introduction (BOF-chairs) - [10 minutes] Problem statement discussion (BOF-chairs + presenter) - [20 minutes] Problem statement review (Navindra Yadav, Insieme Networks) - [10 minutes] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quinn-nsc-problem-statement Problem statement Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes] SFC use case discussion (presenter + open-mic) - [20 minutes] SFC use cases (Hongyu Li, Huawei) - [10 minutes] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-service-chaining-use-cases  Use case Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes] SFC architecture & framework discussion - [20 minutes] Architecture  & framework review (Ron Parker, Affirmed Networks & Paul Quinn, Cisco) - [10 minutes] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-sfc-framework http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quinn-sfc-arch http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-sfc-arch http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-beliveau-sfc-architecture http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sfc-legacy-l4-l7-chain-architecture Architecture & framework Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes]

Agenda (Detailed – cont) Charter text discussion (BOF-chairs) - [25 minutes] Charter text review (BOF-chairs) - [10 minutes] http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sfc/charter/ Charter Q&A (open-mic) - [15 minutes]  Evaluation of required & existing ID's (BOF-chairs + presenters) – [10 minutes] General Q&A (open-mic) – [20 minutes] Closing (BOF-chairs) - [5 minutes] Actions & Next Steps

BoF Scope and Purpose This is a “Working Group forming BoF” Does not mean a WG will automatically be formed Need to convince the IESG that a WG is warranted Key elements Consensus there is work to be done Clear identification of and focus around work topics Work is “within scope” of IETF Critical mass commits to do work Rough consensus on a (direction for) draft charter

SFC Background Berlin IETF meeting: Since Berlin: One-hour non-WG forming BoF Presentation of use cases by Service Providers 250+ persons in the BoF Strong support to do work in space Since Berlin: Drafts: on problem statement (quinn-sfc-problem-statement) , use cases, architecture, encapsulation, ... Proposed charter: problem statement, architecture, requirements, encap, management Good list discussion Today: WG Forming BoF

Service Function Chaining (SFC) Today, a “composite” network service is built from a set of cooperating applications/entities interconnected by Service Nodes (FWs, LBs, SSL accelerators etc.) A Service Function Chain (SFC) is structured as an ordered set of service functions Instantiation of an SFC into the network is called a Service Function Path (SFP) Today, deployments achieved by: Physically placing SNs on data path of underlay, or Changing the forwarding of the underlying network to "steer" packets through a service chain Increasingly inflexible/painful deployment model: Requires changing forwarding behavior of underlay, or Requires physical placement of SF on data path

Service Function Chaining (cont.) SFC is about enforcing differentiated traffic forwarding policies that best accommodate complex services Thereby optimizing service delivery and operation Decouple the "steering" function from the underlay Use special encapsulation to tunnel from one SF to another Encapsulation also carries additional meta data in data packets for SF use Rest of session goes into the details

BoF Presentations

Proposed Charter Work Items Problem Statement & Use cases draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement Architecture Relationships between key building block components Interactions between components identify protocol work areas Generic Service Function Chaining Encapsulation Requirements Encapsulation format Control Plane/Management mechanisms Requirements and Framework Manageability

Use Case Considerations Purpose of Use Cases: Help motivate/justify the problem statement Provide requirements for solutions Expectation is that a small number of use cases will cover the above No need for an exhaustive set, but OK to have one for more involved scenarios WG will need to decide what documents are needed

SFC Charter Milestones April 2014 - Submit to IESG Informational document(s) defining the problem statement and core use cases for SFC May 2014 - Consult with OPS Area on possible charter modifications for management and configuration of SFC components Jan 2015 - Submit to IESG Informational document defining the architecture for SFC Jan 2015 - Submit to IESG requirements for a generic service function chaining encapsulation protocol. Aug 2015 - Submit to IESG Standards Track document specifying the generic service function chaining header encapsulation.

Questions For BoF Berlin show of hands (from minutes): “Is this [area] important?” Yes: a lot. No: none. “Should the IETF work towards creating a WG?” Yes: slightly fewer but still a lot. No: a couple Question for today: Is there support to form a WG with the posted charter?

Q&A Time

Remaining Time Evaluation of required & existing ID's (BOF-chairs + presenters) - [20 minutes] SFC requirements (Ron Parker, Affirmed Networks) - [10 minutes] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-sfc-requirements General Q&A (open-mic) - [10 minutes] Closing (BOF-chairs) - [5 minutes] Actions & Next Steps