Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Dom Bellini, Miroslav Z. Papiz  Structure 
Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Crystal Structure of a Vertebrate Smooth Muscle Myosin Motor Domain and Its Complex with the Essential Light Chain  Roberto Dominguez, Yelena Freyzon,
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Structural Polymorphism of the ParM Filament and Dynamic Instability
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Improved Structures of Full-Length p97, an AAA ATPase: Implications for Mechanisms of Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Change  Jason M. Davies, Axel.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Crystal Structure of Archaeal Recombinase RadA
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Each Actin Subunit Has Three Nebulin Binding Sites
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
SV40 Large T Antigen Hexamer Structure
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Annia Rodríguez-Hernández, John J. Perona  Structure 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Kevin D. Corbett, James M. Berger  Structure 
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 983-992 (June 2006) The Rad51/RadA N-Terminal Domain Activates Nucleoprotein Filament ATPase Activity  Vitold E. Galkin, Yan Wu, Xiao-Ping Zhang, Xinguo Qian, Yujiong He, Xiong Yu, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer, Yu Luo, Edward H. Egelman  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 983-992 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of the RadA-Δ62 Fragment (A) The RadA-Δ62 conformation (cyan) is essentially identical to the structure of the corresponding core in the full-length protein (gold), except for the polymerization motif around Phe-64 and a short helical hinge. (B) The ATPase site of the RadA-Δ62 filament resembles that of the previously determined full-length RadA structure. The AMP-PNP (in cyan) is found between two adjacent protomers. The yellow protomer contributes the triphosphate-wrapping P loop, base-stacking Arg-158, and the catalytic Glu-151 and Gln-257. The gray protomer contacts the ATP analog through the ATP cap (residues Asp-302 to Asp-308) and the C-terminal elbow of the L2 region (residues His-280 to Arg-285). The magnesium ion is shown in red. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ATPase and DNA Strand Exchange Activities (A) ATPase activity of full-length MvRadA. (B) ATPase activity of RadA-Δ62. There were no significant differences between the two proteins' DNA-dependent ATPase activities. (C) The DNA strand-exchange reaction leads to the accumulation of a heteroduplex band (hdDNA) on the ethidium bromide-stained gel. The full-length RadA is active in the presence of all tested nucleoside triphosphates. (D) The truncated RadA-Δ62 is inactive. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Electron Micrographs of RadA Filaments Negatively stained RadA filaments formed by the full-length protein (RadA-S2G) (A and B) and filaments formed by the truncated RadA-Δ62 fragment (C). A mixture of filaments ([A], black arrow) and rings ([A], white arrow) were found in the presence of ADP-AlF, while when AMP-PNP was used, mainly filaments were observed (B). RadA-Δ62-ssDNA filaments complexed with ATP-AlF (C) have no visible modulation of the structure by the deep helical groove, if one compares them with either RadA-S2G-ADP-AlF extended filaments (A) or RadA-AMP-PNP compressed ones (B). These filaments (A) are shown to be two extended filaments that are coiled about each other. The scale bar is 500 Å. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Three-Dimensional Reconstructions of RadA-S2G Filaments Filaments formed in the presence of ADP-AlF (B) and AMP-PNP (C) show up as one-start helices, while RadA-Δ62 produces a two-start helix in the presence of ATP-AlF (D). Filament in (B) has a pitch of ∼99 Å, while filament in (C) is in the compressed form having a pitch of ∼71 Å. A crystal structure of the “core” part (residues 63–322) of MvRadA was used to explore the orientation of protomers in these reconstructions, and this orientation was compared with the “crystal” filament shown in (A). No difference was found in the orientation of the protomers between the “crystal” filament (A) and RadA-S2G-ADP-AlF filament (B), except N terminus in (B) was not fully visualized due to partial disorder. Protomers within RadA-AMP-PNP filament were rotated by ∼30° ([E], green ribbon) from their position in the extended filaments ([E], red ribbon). The subunits that are shown in (E) correspond to those in the centers of (B) and (C), and the rotation is thus about an axis that is perpendicular to the filament axis. The orientation of the protomers in the two-start helix produced by RadA-Δ62 ([F], yellow ribbon) was close to the orientation found in Rad-S2G-ADP-AlF complex ([F], red ribbon). Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RadA Residues Involved in ATP Hydrolysis The positions of these residues (Wu et al., 2004) in extended RadA-ADP-AlF filaments (A), compressed RadA-AMP-PNP filaments (B), and the two-stranded RadA-Δ62-ATP-AlF filaments (C). Residues Arg-158 (cyan) and Pro-307 (blue), which tether the base, and Lys-111 (cyan) and Glu-151 (cyan), needed for catalysis, are shown as ball-and-stick models. The distances between the Cα atoms of Pro-307 and Arg-158 are: RadA-ADP-AlF, 9.4 Å; RadA-AMP-PNP, 19.0 Å; RadA-Δ62-ATP-AlF, 12.2 Å. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Electron Micrographs of Yeast Rad51 The wild-type protein forms filaments on dsDNA in the presence of the ATP analogs AMP-PNP (A) or ATP-γ-S (B), while the G103E mutant failed to polymerize under these conditions. In the presence of ATP and aluminum fluoride, both the wild-type protein (C) and the G103E mutant (D) formed long filaments on dsDNA. The scale bar is 1000 Å. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Yeast Rad51 Filament Three-dimensional reconstructions of yeast Rad51-DNA filaments (B and C) and a crystal structure (Conway et al., 2004) of the protein (A). The wild-type Rad51-DNA filament (B) is quite similar to the crystal filament (A), while the G103E mutant forms a filament on DNA in which the N-terminal domain is not visualized after averaging (C). Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 ATPase Activity of Wild-Type and G103E Mutant Yeast Rad51 Protein The initial activity seen with the G103E mutant, followed by a plateau showing no further activity, is consistent with a single hydrolytic event with no subsequent turnover. Structure 2006 14, 983-992DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.04.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions