Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fluorophores bound to the specimen surface and those in the surrounding medium exist in an equilibrium state. When these molecules are excited and detected.
Advertisements

Surface Plasmon Spectroscopy Lokanathan Arcot Department of Forest Products Technology School of Chemical Technology Aalto University.
TIRF Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy specialized fluorescence microscopy technique specifically images a very thin optical section (50-250nm)
- Review how refraction and reflection govern the behavior of light at boundaries - Observe demonstrations of light and color - Discover how lenses of.
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Optical configuration. The function of a BFP imaging lens, added externally to.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Lens L focuses 488 or 514nm of light from an argon-ion laser at the BFP of a 1.45.
PHY 102: Lecture Index of Refraction 10.2 Total Internal Reflection 10.3 Prism and Rainbows 10.4 Lenses 10.5 Formation of Images 10.6 Lens Equations.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Index-matching effect. Matching the index of refraction of the bead with the solution.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Prismless confocal total internal reflection (CTIR) microscope. 532-nm light is.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Through-the-objective TIRF creates the evanescent field on the aqueous side of the.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) SPW excitation at the tapered fiber tip. The fiber tip is coated with a thin.
17. Electromagnetic waves
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
Index of Refraction.
Optics Kathy Geise April 2007
Actin Protofilament Orientation at the Erythrocyte Membrane
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Structural Changes of Cross-Bridges on Transition from Isometric to Shortening State in Frog Skeletal Muscle  Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Evanescent Excitation and Emission in Fluorescence Microscopy
Rotation of the Lever Arm of Myosin in Contracting Skeletal Muscle Fiber Measured by Two-Photon Anisotropy  J. Borejdo, A. Shepard, I. Akopova, W. Grudzinski,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Eliminating Unwanted Far-Field Excitation in Objective-Type TIRF
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Orientational Changes of Crossbridges During Single Turnover of ATP
Jeremy D. Wilson, Chad E. Bigelow, David J. Calkins, Thomas H. Foster 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging  Victoria E. Centonze, John G. White  Biophysical.
Image Restoration for Confocal Microscopy: Improving the Limits of Deconvolution, with Application to the Visualization of the Mammalian Hearing Organ 
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Scanning Near-Field Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Ruitian Zhang, Rosangela Itri, Martin Caffrey  Biophysical Journal 
Y. Qiao, P. Galvosas, P.T. Callaghan  Biophysical Journal 
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Site-Specific Dichroism Analysis Utilizing Transmission FTIR
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
H. Wang, R. Bash, S.M. Lindsay, D. Lohr  Biophysical Journal 
Actin Dynamics at the Living Cell Submembrane Imaged by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Photobleaching  Susan E. Sund, Daniel Axelrod  Biophysical.
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Kristen E. Norman, Hugh Nymeyer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
How Cells Tiptoe on Adhesive Surfaces before Sticking
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Jun’ichi Wakayama, Takumi Tamura, Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto 
Calcium-Induced Alterations in Mitochondrial Morphology Quantified in Situ with Optical Scatter Imaging  Nada N. Boustany, Rebekah Drezek, Nitish V. Thakor 
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Wide-field multiphoton imaging through scattering media without correction by Adrià Escobet-Montalbán, Roman Spesyvtsev, Mingzhou Chen, Wardiya Afshar.
Orientation of the Myosin Light Chain Region by Single Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Margot E. Quinlan, Joseph.
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages 4662-4671 (June 2006) In Situ Fluorescent Protein Imaging with Metal Film-Enhanced Total Internal Reflection Microscopy  Thomas P. Burghardt, Jon E. Charlesworth, Miriam F. Halstead, James E. Tarara, Katalin Ajtai  Biophysical Journal  Volume 90, Issue 12, Pages 4662-4671 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.079442 Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Prismless TIRM. Excitation light from an expanded laser beam is focused by a lens on the BFP of the objective. Light is refracted at the objective into a parallel ray propagating toward the glass/coverslip interface. All refracted light is incident on the interface at angles beyond critical angle for TIR. The evanescent light at the interface excites fluorescence at the sample surface that is focused into a narrow cone by the metal film with maximal intensity at θm>θc and collected by the objective. Fluorescence transmits the filter cube and is focused by the tube lens on the pinhole. A collector focuses light transmitting the pinhole onto the active surface of the APD. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The water/metal/glass multilayer used with TIRM. A dipolar probe (μ) is excited by the evanescent field in the water medium produced by the totally internally reflecting laser beam incident at angle θ. Fluorescence emission from dipole μ propagates in the glass medium in the super- and subcritical angle fluorescence regions and is collected by the objective. SAF originates from the dipole near-field, whereas subcritical angle fluorescence is from the dipole far-field emission. Critical angle θc is the incidence angle beyond which TIR occurs at a glass/water interface with dielectric constants ɛ3 and ɛ1. The SPR angle, θsp, is the incidence angle for peak transmission through the metal film with dielectric constant ɛ2. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Excitation light intensity on the water side of the metal/water (metal) or glass/water (glass) interface as a function of incidence angle θ for p-polarized or s-polarized incident light. Light incident at 0≤θ<θc propagates into the water medium, whereas for θc≤θ<90° an evanescent field is produced in the water medium. The vertical line marks the θ=θc point separating propagating and evanescent. For all incidence angles, the metal severely attenuates s-polarized incident light. Peak transmission for p-polarized light incident on the metal interface occurs at the surface plasmon angle θsp. Dielectric constants are ɛ1=1.77, ɛ2=−32.5+i8.4, and ɛ3=2.25 for the water, metal, and glass media, respectively. Metal film thickness is 30nm and the incident light wavelength is 514.5nm. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SAF intensity as a function of dipole distance z from the metal/water (metal) or glass/water interface (glass). Constants are identical to those in Fig. 3 and collection is from the glass medium over a surface area that covers the solid cone of fluorescence emitted from the dipole and transmitting the interface with polar angle 105°≤θem≤116° measured from the z axis in Fig. 2. SAF z-profiles are indicated for dipole components parallel (μ‖) or perpendicular (μ⊥) to the interface. Also depicted for comparison is the exponential function e−z/100. SAF intensity for μ‖ at the metal film has a peak height ∼20-fold smaller than the other intensities as indicated in the legend. All emission intensities fall off rapidly in z, implying SAF selectively detects probes near the interface. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The IPSF z-dimension profile for a unit magnitude dipole emitter perpendicular to the interface (μ⊥) under TIRM with and without a 30-nm-thick aluminum film. Excitation light incidence angle was chosen to produce evanescent field depths of ∼70 and 100nm. Emission is collected from the glass medium over a surface area that covers the solid cone of fluorescence emitted from the dipole and transmitting the interface with polar angle 105°≤θem≤180° measured from the z axis in Fig. 2 and appropriate for an NA 1.45 microscope objective. Collected fluorescence includes both SAF and subcritical angle fluorescence (Fig. 2). For the metal film, essentially all emission is SAF so the summation over subcritical angle fluorescence contributes negligibly to the IPSF z-profile. For the bare interface, subcritical angle fluorescence makes a substantial contribution to the IPSF z-profile. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A single skeletal muscle fiber labeled with 5′IATR and observed with fluorescence under metal film-enhanced TIRM (right) and TIRM at a bare-glass interface (left). Metal film thickness is 30–40nm. Panels A and B correspond to different evanescent field depths. Panel B has the normal depth of ∼100nm. Panel A is shallower but deeper than the minimal depth in Fig. 8. Observations were recorded on a CCD camera using a rhodamine filter set. The striated pattern is due to 5′IATR localization in the thick filament at the myosin cross-bridge. The bare-glass/metal-film boundary is demarcated by the abrupt change in background fluorescence. The bright oval structure is a nucleus that has scattered surface plasmons creating propagating light that excites fluorescence deeper in the fiber. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of fluorescence images of two single skeletal muscle fibers labeled with 5′IATR. The upper image was taken under metal film-enhanced TIRM. Metal film thickness is 30–40nm. The lower image was taken with a conventional diffraction-limited confocal microscope (no metal film present). Different fibers were used in the two images; however, both fibers were from the same 5′IATR-labeled fiber bundle. The metal film-enhanced TIRM image shows 5′IATR label localized in the Z-disk of the fiber and reveals features of Z-disk structure. The fluorescence probably originates from the small fraction of α-actinin modified by 5′IATR. The TIRM image shows ice crystal formation on the camera window. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Minimal evanescent field depth image from a single skeletal muscle fiber labeled with 5′IATR. Image was taken under metal film-enhanced TIRM. Metal film thickness is 30–40nm. Sarcomeres appear narrower and scattering at the nucleus is minimal compared to the moderate field depth in Figs. 6 or 7. Labeling at the Z-disk is visible but interrupted. Despite the low fluorescence light level, the fiber is cleanly imaged because of the good suppression of background fluorescence by the metal film. The image shows ice crystal formation on the camera window. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The fluorescence intensity residence duration distribution, Rf(t,Vd), tabulated from observed (■, ▴, or ♦) and simulated (solid or dashed lines) data. Error bars are the standard error of the mean for five independent observations of Rf(t,Vd). Rf(t,Vd)s from 100-nm spheres (■ or ▴) are broader than that for the 40-nm spheres (♦) due to their slower diffusion. Likewise, Rf(t,Vd) from 100-nm spheres diffusing in the normal depth evanescent field (■) is broader than when they diffuse in the minimal depth evanescent field (▴) because spheres are slower to leave the larger Vd defined by the deep evanescent field. Simulated data accurately reproduced the observed Rf(t,Vd)s where we used 100-nm (solid line) or 70-nm (long-short-dashed line) evanescent field depths. Simulated data for the 40-nm spheres (short-dashed line) used 100-nm evanescent field depth. Biophysical Journal 2006 90, 4662-4671DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.105.079442) Copyright © 2006 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions