Legal Minute: Case On Dyslexia and IDEA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Advertisements

Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA 1.
Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility
Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Educational Champion Training MODULE 8: Special Education and Accommodations © National Center for Youth Law, April This document does not constitute.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Target Testing 101 Parent Informational Power Point
Are You a “Responsible” Employee? Presented by: JIM WALSH.
Manifestation Determination Walk Through
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES RTI: Academics.
T EN T IPS FOR D EALING WITH S TUDENTS WITH A UTISM Presented by: JIM WALSH.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
PLACED BY THEIR PARENTS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS SERVING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES.
SPECIAL NEEDS PRETEST. 1. Why are there services for children with special needs? A. Some school districts have the money to offer services for children.
School Nursing Services By: Eric G. Rodriguez. Related Services 34 C.F.R. § “means transportation and such developmental, corrective, and other.
Specific Learning Disability Criteria for School Administrators Richard Henderson Regional Special Education Consultant Idaho State University.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
Pretest: Special Education Terms Prepare a one sentence definition for each term. For example: “Special Education Instruction is that which may be provided.
Personal Tutoring. Purposes of this session To confirm our understanding of the purposes and procedures of the Personal Tutoring Scheme To identify key.
SPECIAL EDUCATION N.J.A.C. 6A:14. THREE MAIN AREAS OF CHANGE Reviewed the amendments originally proposed to the State Board in 2013 Limit proposed changes.
The 1% Rule: Alternate Assessment Participation November 20, 2007.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
Goose Creek CISD Special Education Districtwide Staff Development Conference February 15, 2013.
Cheerleading, OCR and Retaliation: Two Recent OCR Letters Presented by: Eric G. Rodriguez.
Chapter 5 Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities
When Does 1:1 Add-up? 1 Presented by: Elvin W. Houston.
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
Assessing Student Needs
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Mountain BOCES. Definition of APD A deficit in the processing of information that is specific to the auditory modality. The problem may be exacerbated.
INFORMATION SESSION: GIFTED EDUCATION IN GVSD Great Valley School April 5,
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
Americans With Disabilities Act. Video ME8.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
(202) King Street, Suite 650 Alexandria, VA WASHINGTON, DC DISABILITY QUALIFICATIONS.
“I am the Master of My Domain”: The Principal’s Role in the ARD Process Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C Stoneridge Road, Suite D-101.
Understanding the IEP Process
Special Education Ministry of Education
LEADERSHIP IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
Referral and Identification for Special Education: RTI Tier Three
Special Education for Parents
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Special Education & Law Enforcement: The Legal Issues
Taken from Irwin Mitchell 2017
The Supreme Court Speaks: Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools (S. Ct
Assessment and Children with Disabilities
Cynthia Buechler Attorney-at-Law Buechler & Associates, P.C. &
Engineering Design Process
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
What Does “Conclusory” Mean?
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Navigating the confusing world of school discipline
Court Procedure.
Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C.
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
TOP TEN ISSUES RE: SECTION 504
Reason to suspect disability
School-based evaluations
Faculty Meeting Resource
The Limits of Your “Duty”
Recent 5th Circuit Child Find Case
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Private Placement Cases: A Lesson from the 8th Circuit
PLACE TITLE TEXT HERE SUBTITLE
PREPARING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES FOR POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION
Presentation transcript:

Legal Minute: Case On Dyslexia and IDEA Presented by: Eric G. Rodriguez

Can a student have dyslexia and NOT have a learning disability? A federal judge in Texas has come pretty close to saying this This is a case in which the district determined that the 4th grader had dyslexia, but did not qualify as having a learning disability This decision was based on a thorough Cross-Battery assessment by a qualified evaluator Testing showed that none of the student’s cognitive abilities were below average The student did not demonstrate the “pattern of strengths and weaknesses” that is a sign of a learning disability

Dyslexia and IDEA The district decided that the student did not qualify as SLD under IDEA But screening showed the student to have dyslexia and the district did provide dyslexia services to address this

Court’s Decision The court ruled that the district committed a procedural error by not identifying the student as having a learning disability The judge noted that the legal definition of “specific learning disability” offers several conditions as examples of an SLD One of those is “dyslexia” This turned out to be a harmless error Even though the district did not label the student as having SLD and did not create an IEP to address it, the district continued to provide good services that enabled the student to make progress No harm, no foul

More Analysis The court holds that once a student has been identified as having dyslexia, no further testing is required “In the present case, [the student] has already been diagnosed with an eligible condition, thus bypassing both the need for additional testing to determine SLD status and the District’s discretion in making such a determination” In other words: if the student has dyslexia, test no more: the kid is eligible. Write an IEP!

But let’s think about this… This ruling is not consistent with the newly revised Dyslexia Handbook we have The Handbook tells us that students with dyslexia might be eligible under IDEA, or they might be eligible under 504 The Handbook also suggests that some kids with dyslexia are not “substantially limited” in a major life activity, and therefore, are not eligible under either IDEA or 504 So we have that, and now we have a federal court telling us that it’s simpler than that: that all kids with dyslexia are eligible as SLD under IDEA

??? It’s okay to be confused… The definitions and procedures for testing and identification of students with dyslexia are ambiguous enough that second guessing is inevitable The case is William V. v. Copperas Cove ISD, decided by the federal court for the Western District of Texas on December 10, 2018

Eric G. Rodriguez erodriguez@wabsa.com Phone: 210.979.6633 | Fax: 210.979.7024 www.walshgallegos.com

The information in this presentation was prepared by Walsh Gallegos Treviño Russo & Kyle P.C. It is intended to be used for general information only and is not to be considered specific legal advice. If specific legal advice is sought, consult an attorney. © Walsh Gallegos 2018