Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer?  F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, J. Leger, R. Bidault, V. Cadoret,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated  Baris Ata, Brian Kaplan, Hal Danzer, Michael Glassner, Michael.
Advertisements

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Deferring embryo transfer of morula and early blastocysts on day 5 improves implantation rates when these embryos are cultured to day 6, vitrified at.
Kay Neumann, Georg Griesinger  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Attitudes and policies regarding access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technologies in Israel  Daniel Sperling, Yael Simon  Reproductive.
Diet and endometriosis risk: A literature review
Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial  Eman A. Elgindy, Ahmed.
Nina Desai, Faten AbdelHafez, Mohamed A
Cross-validation and predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms for day-5 blastocyst transfer  Aisling Ahlström, Matts Wikland, Lena Rogberg,
Bruce S. Shapiro, Said T. Daneshmand, Humberto Restrepo, Forest C
Transfer of blastocysts with deviant morphological and morphokinetic parameters at early stages of in-vitro development: a case series  Astrid Stecher,
Xiao Zhang, Krinos M Trokoudes, Constantinos Pavlides 
Group culture of human zygotes is superior to individual culture in terms of blastulation, implantation and life birth  T. Ebner, O. Shebl, M. Moser,
Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate  Jun Qiang Zhang, Xiu Ling Li, Yuzhu Peng,
Freeze-all can be a superior therapy to another fresh cycle in patients with prior fresh blastocyst implantation failure  Bruce S Shapiro, Said T Daneshmand,
Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring  Csaba Pribenszky, Szabolcs Mátyás, Péter Kovács, Eszter Losonczi,
Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort  L.F. Doherty, J.R. Martin, U. Kayisli,
Gillian M. Lockwood  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Aspirin and heparin as adjuvants during IVF do not improve live birth rates in unexplained implantation failure  Muhammad A. Akhtar, Hanan Eljabu, James.
Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles
Semra Kahraman, Zafer Nihat Candan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Deferring embryo transfer of morula and early blastocysts on day 5 improves implantation rates when these embryos are cultured to day 6, vitrified at.
Katja Knez, Tomaz Tomazevic, Eda Vrtacnik-Bokal, Irma Virant-Klun 
Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?
Moniek van der Zanden, Annemiek W. Nap  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Contrasting effects of G1. 2/G2
Maternal concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin in very early IVF pregnancies and duration of pregnancy: a follow-up study  Tom G. Tanbo, Manuela.
S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells 
Pregnancy and live birth following the transfer of vitrified–warmed blastocysts derived from zona- and corona-cell-free oocytes  Yimin Shu, Wenlin Peng,
Non-invasive viability assessment of day-4 frozen–thawed human embryos using near infrared spectroscopy  Carlijn G. Vergouw, Lucy L. Botros, Kevin Judge,
Working to eliminate multiple pregnancies: a success story in Québec
Prognostic factors influencing fresh and frozen IVF outcomes: an analysis of the UK national database  W. Mark Hirst, Andy Vail, Daniel R. Brison, Stephen.
Cumulative live-birth delivery after IVF/ICSI since the progressive introduction of single- embryo transfer  D. De Neubourg, C. Daels, M. Elseviers, K.
Individual demands of human embryos on IVF culture medium: influence on blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome  B. Wirleitner, P. Vanderzwalmen,
Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Neelam Potdar, Tarek Gelbaya, Luciano G.
Effect of energy expenditure and physical activity on the outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment  Mert Kucuk, Fadime Doymaz, Bulent Urman  Reproductive.
Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence
Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature
Lisa Cummins, Juliette Koch, Suha Kilani 
Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li 
Ronit Machtinger, Raoul Orvieto  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Women's age and embryo developmental speed accurately predict clinical pregnancy after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer  Keiichi Kato, Satoshi.
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective  I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders  Reproductive.
Alexis Adler, Hsaio-Ling Lee, David H
Effect of chromosomal polymorphisms of different genders on fertilization rate of fresh IVF–ICSI embryo transfer cycles  Ji Liang, Yongsheng Zhang, Yang.
Swapna S. Desai, Swati K. Achrekar, Smita R. Paranjape, Sadhana K
Monozygotic triplet pregnancies after single blastocyst transfer: two cases and literature review  Lionel Dessolle, Dalila Allaoua, Thomas Fréour, Claudine.
Stanley Paul Leibo (1937–2014): scientist, mentor and friend
A clinically useful simplified blastocyst grading system
A direct healthcare cost analysis of the cryopreserved versus fresh transfer policy at the blastocyst stage  Enrico Papaleo, Luca Pagliardini, Valeria.
Follicle recruitment determines IVF productivity rate via the number of embryos frozen and subsequent transfers  James D. Stanger, John L. Yovich  Reproductive.
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Clinical significance of first-trimester intrauterine haematomas detected in pregnancies achieved by IVF-embryo transfer  Lan Xiang, Zhaolian Wei, Juan.
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential  Xiaoying Zheng, Yuan Chen, Jie Yan, Yuqi Wu, Xinjie Zhuang, Shengli Lin, Jinliang.
Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring  Laura van Loendersloot, Madelon.
The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting    Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Response: time-lapse systems for ART
C Almeida, M Sousa, A Barros  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Effect of piroxicam administration before embryo transfer on IVF outcome: a randomized controlled trial  Luca Dal Prato, Andrea Borini  Reproductive BioMedicine.
Elective single-embryo transfer: persuasive communication strategies can affect choice in a young British population  O.B.A. van den Akker, S. Purewal 
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Live birth following early follicular phase oocyte collection and vitrified-warmed embryo transfer 8 days later  Safak Hatırnaz, Ebru Hatırnaz, Baris.
Implantation of fresh and thawed–warmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG  Cynthia K. Sites, Peter St Marie,
Piotr Pierzynski  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Randomized controlled trial of benzocaine versus placebo spray for pain relief at hysterosalpingogram  E.A. Bachman, S. Senapati, M.D. Sammel, S.K. Kalra 
Two singleton live births after the transfer of cryopreserved–thawed day-3 embryos following an unstimulated in-vitro oocyte maturation cycle  Donna Dowling-Lacey,
China’s model of egg donation is a policy lesson for Britain
A. Finn, L. Scott, Thomas O’Leary, D. Davies, J. Hill 
Presentation transcript:

Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer?  F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, J. Leger, R. Bidault, V. Cadoret, C. Chavez, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, D. Royere  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 510-519 (October 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043 Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR) after single-blastocyst transfer according to blastocyst expansion (B1–B6) on day 5 (D5) and day 6 (D6). Bars with the same superscript letters are statistically different (P<0.05). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 21, 510-519DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR) after single-blastocyst transfer according to blastocyst score on day 5. Bars with the same superscript letters are statistically different (P<0.05). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 21, 510-519DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rate of blastocyst development according to embryo score on days 1 and 2. Bars with the same superscript letters are statistically different (P<0.0001). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 21, 510-519DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relationship between embryo score and blastocyst score. Bars with the same superscript letters are statistically different (r=0.28, P<0.0001). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010 21, 510-519DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.