Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
Advertisements

QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Dartmouth CPHS February 7, 2017
Submitting human subjects research
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Changes to Exempt Categories
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Submitting human subjects research
The Impact of the Final Rule Changes
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Brown Bag Series October 2017
Overview of Changes to the Common Rule
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
2018 New Human Subject Regulations Approval Periods & Review Categories January 2018 Version 1.
JAN 24, 2018, UPDATE: The effective date of the new rule is now July 19, 2018, with the prospect of an additional 6-month delay to January 21, Even.
Changes to Exempt Categories
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
New Human Subjects Rule
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Common Rule.
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Secondary Research with Identifiable Information and Biospecimens
2018 Revised Common Rule: Exemptions
An Introduction to Regulatory Changes to Human Subjects Research
George Alter ICPSR Institute for Social Research
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Submitting human subjects research
Overview of Changes to Human Subjects Research Regulations
Common Rule Changes Effective date is January 21, 2019
Submitting human subjects research
Changes in the Common Rule: The Final Rule
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Changes to Carthage College IRB processes and forms
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
Key Changes to the Common Rule-
Common Rule 2018 Exemption Changes
New Exempt Categories and Forms – Guidance under the New Common Rule
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Does my Research need IRB Review?
Presentation transcript:

Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB January 2019 Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB The University of Texas at Austin

Overview Expanded categories enabling more research to be exempt Some clarifications that may restrict exemptions Some categories require limited IRB review

Standard Exclusions for Exempt Prisoners may not be engaged in exempt research unless incidentally as part of a larger population FDA regulated research may not be exempt

Category 1: Research in educational settings Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, that specifically involves normal educational practices that are not likely to adversely impact students’ opportunity to learn required educational content or the assessment of educators who provide instruction. This includes most research on regular and special education instructional strategies, and research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.

Category 1 continued Category Limitations Conducted only in established or commonly accepted educational settings No adverse impact on students’ learning or assessment of educators who provide instruction

Category 2: Surveys, interviews & public observation Research that only includes interactions involving educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior (including visual or auditory recording) if at least one of the following criteria is met:

Category 2 continued At least 1 must be met: Data has no identifiers or linked code; If identifiers or code, any disclosure of the research data could not possibly be harmful to subjects; OR If data are identified or coded, the IRB conducts a limited review to determine privacy & confidentiality protections are adequate

Category 2 continued Category Expansion Allows collection of identifiable information that could potentially lead to criminal / civil liability or be damaging to financial standing, employability, educational advancement or reputation (with IRB approved privacy & confidentiality protections) Category Limitations Minors cannot participate in surveys or interviews Minors can only be publicly observed if investigators do not participate in activities being observed Research cannot include any other interventions beyond those specified Limited IRB review required for (iii)

NEW Category 3 – Benign behavioral interventions Research involving benign behavioral interventions in conjunction with the collection of information from an adult subject through verbal or written responses (including data entry) or audiovisual recording if the subject prospectively agrees to the intervention and information collection and at least one of the following criteria is met:

Category 3 continued At least 1 must be met: Data has no identifiers or linked code; If data are identified or coded, any disclosure of the research data could not possibly be harmful to subjects; OR If data are identified or coded, the IRB conducts a limited review to determine privacy & confidentiality protections are adequate

Category 3 continued Benign behavioral interventions are brief in duration, harmless, painless, not physically invasive, not likely to have a significant adverse lasting impact on subjects, and the investigator has no reason to think the subjects will find the interventions offensive or embarrassing. Examples: playing online game solving puzzles under various noise conditions Deciding how to divide a nominal amount of received cash between themselves and others

Category 3 continued Category Allowance Allows collection of identifiable information that could potentially lead to criminal / civil liability or be damaging to financial standing, employability, educational advancement or reputation (with IRB approved privacy & confidentiality protections) Category Limitations Minors are excluded Subjects must prospectively agree to participate Cannot involve deception unless participants prospectively agree to be unaware of or misled about the nature or purposes of the research. Limited IRB review required for option C

Category 4 – Secondary research for which consent is not required Secondary research uses of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, if at least one of the following criteria is met:

Category 4 continued The data or specimens are publicly available; Information is recorded without identifiers or linked code AND the investigator does not contact the subjects nor re-identify subjects

Category 4 continued The secondary use research is covered by a HIPAA waiver of authorization or is being done for healthcare operations (45 CFR 164.501) or public health activities (45 CFR 164.512(b))

Category 4 continued The research is conducted by, or on behalf of, a Federal department or agency using government-generated or government-collected information……

Category 4 continued Category Expansion Data no longer has to be existing at the start of the study; data may be prospectively collected New: Allows for collection and use of identifiable health information if the information is regulated by HIPAA privacy laws New: Allows for collection and use of identifiable information if collected by, or on behalf of, a Federal agency using govt-generated or govt-collected information

Category 5 – Federally conducted or supported research Research and demonstration projects that are conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency… and that are designed to study, evaluate, improve or otherwise examine public benefit or service programs… Must be published on publicly available Federal website prior to beginning

Category 6 – Taste & food quality Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies: If wholesome foods without additives are consumed, or If a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient, agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the FDA or approved by the EPA or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the USDA

Categories 7 & 8 – Research registry with broad consent UT does not implement categories 7 & 8 at this time

UT Specifics All exempt research requires prior ORSC approval ORSC IRB analysts will make exempt determination Studies requiring limited IRB review will be reviewed by an ORSC IRB analyst who is an IRB member Amendments only required if: Change in PI Research changes may no longer qualify the research as exempt Study status update required every 3 years Any expedited research now qualifying for exemption will be reclassified at time of continuing review or amendment