RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Instructional Decision Making
Knox County Schools Transition to RTI2
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
1 Progress Monitoring Content developed by Wayne Callender and Jeanie Mercier Smith The Link Between Instruction and Reading Proficiency.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
First Sound Fluency & Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Phonemic Awareness
Response to Intervention
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
0 1 Response to Intervention is NOT: Just a Special Education initiative Only for students with disabilities Only for beginning reading A new way to.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention Making it Work in Jessamine County Michelle Gadberry, Psy. S. Assistant Director of Special Programs.
Data Study Strategies Shawna Moran – School Improvement
RTI Grade Level Team Meetings Presented by April Kelley.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Cindy Edwards, Administrative Supervisor Response to Intervention, Dyslexia/504 August 2, 2011 A Multi-Tiered Prevention System.
Decision Rules: Models, Ideas & Resources Presented by April Kelley.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Data Based Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Plan for Response to Intervention (RTI). What is Response to Intervention? Response to Intervention (RTI) is a practice of providing high-quality instruction.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Data-Driven Decision Making and the RTI Process
Group Intervention Review (20% Meetings)
Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Systems Problem Solving
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Sault Area Public Schools Sheri L. McFarlane, Ed.S
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness Initial Training
Student Support Team Process – Pre-CSE Referral
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance Kira Florence Jonathan Potter University of Oregon

Intensive Levels of Assistance Identification Which students are we talking about? Providing Support How can we provide intensive support for these students? Assessing intensive students’ response to intervention How do we determine adequate response to our intensive support?

Keys to Providing Intensive Assistance Actions Determine what level of support is necessary for student success Provide necessary level of support Decisions Was the problem remediated?

Identification Question: Which students are we talking about? Answer: It depends on your system and resources Operational definitions – Dependant upon what’s been done prior with these students Examples Students who fail to progress after two (2) small group interventions Students performing in the lowest 5% Students who have not made sufficient progress in at least 2 interventions for at least 6 weeks (Fuchs & Fuchs, 1997)

Identification In the Real World… Individualized/Intensive 5% Intermediate/Targeted 15% Universal/Core 80%

Planning Support Individual Problem Solving Data-driven intervention Present Level of Performance Strengths, Weaknesses Previous Instruction/Intervention Alterable Variables Chart Previous Progress Monitoring Data Goal When has the problem been remediated? Alternative Explanations Absences, Hearing, Vision

Planning Support: Gathering Information Records Review Interviews Observations Testing Standards Examples Tigard Tualatin Individual Problem-Solving Worksheet

Individual Problem Solving Worksheet

Planning Support: Action Plan Intervention Details Assessment Plan Decision Rules Next Meeting Scheduled Time People Materials Example Oregon Reading First CSI Summary Map

http://oregonreadingfirst. uoregon. edu/downloads/blank_CSI_Summary http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/blank_CSI_Summary.pdf

Alterable Variables Chart http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Alt_Var_Chart_2.pdf

Opportunities to Learn Allocated Time vs. Academic Engaged Time Instructional Delivery Pacing of Instruction, Increased Opportunities to Respond Frequency of Intervention Daily Double-Dosing How can we maximize engagement?

Alterable Variables Chart http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Alt_Var_Chart_2.pdf

Program Efficacy Evidenced-Based Practices Oregon Reading First Curriculum Review http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/curriculum_review.php Targets Relevant Skills Level of Explicit Instruction Does the program have evidence of effectiveness for students with similar skill deficits?

Alterable Variables Chart http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Alt_Var_Chart_2.pdf

Program Implementation Treatment Fidelity Professional Development/Staff Support Is the program implemented as intended?

Alterable Variables Chart http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Alt_Var_Chart_2.pdf

Grouping for Instruction Group Size Existing Groups—Think Creatively!!! Efficient Use of Resources Which type of group best meets the student’s needs?

Alterable Variables Chart http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Alt_Var_Chart_2.pdf

Coordination of Instruction More frequent meeting to review progress and modify as needed Involvement of “specialists” Is everybody on the same page? Do we have the necessary expertise?

Providing Support Focus on what we can change NOT ALWAYS CURRICULUM Determine what works for EACH child

Assessing Response to Intervention Important Questions What is adequate response to intensive intervention? When should I consider SPED and think about developing an IEP?

What is adequate response to intensive intervention? Examine the data Identify where a child is currently performing CBM, DIBELS, etc. Set a goal Observable and measurable Examples: Achieving end of year benchmark Ex. DIBELS end of 1st grade ORF benchmark – 40 wpm Meet a local normative standard Improve to 40th percentile, based on district norms General norms for student growth (see table)

What is adequate response to intensive intervention? Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, Walz, & Germann (1993) Grade Realistic Goals Ambitious Goals 1 2 words per week 3 1.5 2.0 1.0 4 .85 1.1 5 .5 .8 6 .3 .65 (Present level of performance) + (# of weeks X wpm per week improvement) = final goal

What is adequate response to intensive intervention? Example using norms for student growth (PLOP) + (# of weeks x words per week improvement) = final goal Billy is a 2nd grader currently reading 20 wpm in the Fall. (20 wpm) + (30 weeks x 2 wpm per week improvement) = 80 wpm

What is adequate response to intensive intervention? Determine at what rate students need to learn to meet the goal (aimline) Frequently monitor progress towards that goal 1-2 times a week Determine whether they are on track to meet their goal, or whether a change in instruction should be made to help them meet their goal. Utilize decision rules Consecutive data points below aimline (depends on frequency of monitoring) Ex. 3 point decision rule Trendline analysis of data points Compare slope of student data with slope of progress aimline

Assessing Response to Intervention 3 point decision rule Individualized intervention initiated Student Identified as Needing Intensive Support Modify intervention Modify intervention Oral Reading Fluency Aimline Determine resources needed to sustain progress (Gen Ed, SPED, Title, EA assistance, etc.)

When should I consider SPED and developing an IEP? Student is not making adequate progress OR Resources needed to sustain progress only available in SPED Developing decision rules for SPED referral Considerations: Number of individualized evidence-based interventions (ex., after 2 intensive interventions were tried) Time in individualized evidence-based interventions (ex., after at least 3 weeks in an intensive intervention) Remember: Interventions must be implemented with fidelity Where can necessary resources be provided (Gen Ed, SPED, title, EA assistance, etc)

Big Ideas – Intensive Levels of Support RTI is a system – one level of support depends on prior levels of support Determine level and type of support needed for success of each student Focus on alterable instructional variables Data, Data, Data!