Process for simultaneous balloting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /238r0 Submission January 2006 Simon Barber, Devicescape Software IncSlide 1 Process for simultaneous balloting Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Coexistence Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
Selection Procedure Recommendation
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
IEEE White Space Radio Intended timeline
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
May 2005 CAPWAP AHC Closing Report
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
TGu liaisons Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
January Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
Tge Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Draft Revision Procedure
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Process for simultaneous balloting January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 Process for simultaneous balloting Date: 2006-01-27 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

Abstract This document describes a process for January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 Abstract This document describes a process for Preparing an Amendment when a Revision is in progress. Preparing an Amendment when another Amendment is in process and expected to be send for approval prior to it. These notes come from a conference call between the IEEE 802.11 WG CAC and the IEEE-SA on 27th Jan 2006. Present from IEEE 802.11 WG CAC Bruce Kramer, Clint Chaplin, Richard Paine, Bob O’Hara, Tom Siep (attending for Adrian Stephens), Donald Eastlake, Simon Barber Present from IEEE-SA Mike Kipness, Michael Fisher, Dave Ringle, Michelle Turner, Yvette Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

If your amendment is based on a revision that is in progress.. January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 If your amendment is based on a revision that is in progress.. Your document should be based on the latest draft of the revision text. Your document must then be sent for sponsor balloting with: the current, complete approved base text (prior to the revision), AND the latest draft of the revision AND the amendment being balloted. If a technical change happens in a part of the revision text that is relevant to the amendment then the amendment should be re-circulated. Relevant technical change is decided by the ballot resolution group (the TG itself in 802.11’s case) Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

When a revision and another amendment are in progress… January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 When a revision and another amendment are in progress… Your amendment should be based on the latest draft of the revision text AND the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved prior to yours Your document must then be sent for sponsor balloting with all the below: the current, complete approved base text (prior to the revision) the latest draft of the revision the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved before yours These amendments are only included if they make technical changes that are relevant to your amendment. your amendment. If a technical change happens in a part of the revision text or part of the amendment text expected to be approved prior to your amendment, and that change is technically relevant to your amendment then your amendment should be re-circulated. Relevant technical change is decided by the ballot resolution group (the TG itself in 802.11’s case) Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

When other amendments are in progress… January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 When other amendments are in progress… Your amendment should be based on the current, complete approved base text AND the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved prior to yours Your document must then be sent for sponsor balloting with all the below: the current, complete approved base text the latest draft of all amendments expected to be approved before yours These amendments are only included if they make technical changes that are relevant to your amendment. your amendment. If a technical change happens in a part of the revision text or part of the amendment text expected to be approved prior to your amendment, and that change is technically relevant to your amendment then your amendment should be re-circulated. Relevant technical change is decided by the ballot resolution group (the TG itself in 802.11’s case) Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

Note: Approved means approved by REVCOM January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 January 2006 Note: Approved means approved by REVCOM None of this process affects the need for drafts to be based ONLY on previously approved documents when they are finally presented to REVCOM. Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc

References January 2006 January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/238r0 Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc Simon Barber, Devicescape Software Inc