Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UvrD Helicase Unwinds DNA One Base Pair at a Time by a Two-Part Power Stroke Jae Young Lee, Wei Yang Cell Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December.
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Thuy T.M. Ngo, Qiucen Zhang, Ruobo Zhou, Jaya G. Yodh, Taekjip Ha  Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
M.C. Murphy, Ivan Rasnik, Wei Cheng, Timothy M. Lohman, Taekjip Ha 
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Yonatan Savir, Tsvi Tlusty  Molecular Cell 
Dynamics of Membrane Nanotubulation and DNA Self-Assembly
Discovering the Power of Single Molecules
Yupeng Qiu, Hengyao Niu, Lela Vukovic, Patrick Sung, Sua Myong 
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Force-Induced Bidirectional Stepping of Cytoplasmic Dynein
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 142, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Forward and Reverse Motion of Single RecBCD Molecules on DNA
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
The Mechanochemical Cycle of Mammalian Kinesin-2 KIF3A/B under Load
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Ambarish Kunwar, Michael Vershinin, Jing Xu, Steven P. Gross 
Dynamic Recognition of the mRNA Cap by Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E
Need for Speed: Mechanical Regulation of a Replicative Helicase
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
POT1-TPP1 Regulates Telomeric Overhang Structural Dynamics
Volume 142, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Helicase and Polymerase Move Together Close to the Fork Junction and Copy DNA in One-Nucleotide Steps  Manjula Pandey, Smita S. Patel  Cell Reports  Volume.
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Dynein Tethers and Stabilizes Dynamic Microtubule Plus Ends
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Revisiting the Central Dogma One Molecule at a Time
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Microtubule Assembly Dynamics at the Nanoscale
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Daniel L. Kaplan, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Figure 1. Removal of the 2B subdomain activates Rep monomer unwinding
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Single-Molecule Approaches Embrace Molecular Cohorts
Presentation transcript:

Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages 1299-1309 (June 2007) Single-Molecule Studies Reveal Dynamics of DNA Unwinding by the Ring-Shaped T7 Helicase  Daniel S. Johnson, Lu Bai, Benjamin Y. Smith, Smita S. Patel, Michelle D. Wang  Cell  Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages 1299-1309 (June 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Configuration (A) This cartoon illustrates the experimental configuration for the observation of the unwinding of dsDNA by a single T7 helicase (not to scale). One strand of the dsDNA to be unwound was attached to a trapped microsphere via a biotin/streptavidin connection. The other strand was anchored to a microscope coverslip surface via a dig/antidig connection on a dsDNA anchoring segment. The microsphere was held in a feedback-enhanced optical trap so that its position relative to the trap center and the force on it could be measured. Helicase unwinding of dsDNA was monitored as an increase in the ssDNA length. Helicase did not unwind the dsDNA anchoring segment because it prefers two ssDNA regions at a fork junction (Ahnert and Patel, 1997). (B) The DNA construct contained both digoxigenin (dig) and biotin labels for binding to the coverglass and microsphere, respectively. The dig label was located at one end of the DNA construct and was bound to an antidigoxigenin-coated coverglass. The biotin label was on one strand of the DNA and was bound to a streptavidin-coated microsphere. On the same strand near this biotin label was a nick in the ssDNA. The nick allowed the DNA to be mechanically unwound (unzipped) when the DNA anchor on the coverslip was moved away from the microsphere. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Experimental Method for Measurements of Helicase Translocation along a ssDNA and a Typical Data Set The experimental procedures were: (1) mechanically unwind ∼400 bp of dsDNA at a constant velocity of 1400 bp/s to produce a ssDNA loading region, (2) maintain the DNA extension until force drops below a threshold indicating helicase unwinding of the DNA fork, (3) mechanically unwind another ∼500 bp (ΔL) of dsDNA to generate ssDNA for helicase translocation, and (4) maintain new DNA fork position until force drops again indicating the helicase has caught up with the fork. The blue regions represent the two mechanical unwinding steps, and the red regions represent the two helicase unwinding events with intervening time Δt. Helicase translocation velocity on ssDNA was computed as ΔL/Δt. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Measurements of Helicase Arrival Time at the Fork Junction and Helicase Translocation Velocity on ssDNA (A) Measurement of the time it took a helicase to bind to the 400 bp ssDNA loading region and then reach the DNA junction. With the helicase concentration used in our experiments (2 nM monomer), this time followed a single exponential distribution (fit in red) with an average time of ∼80 s (N = 237). This average helicase arrival time at the junction was much longer than the typical observation time for subsequent ssDNA translocation or DNA unwinding measurements (see Supplemental Discussion). Therefore, it was unlikely that more than one helicase acted on the same DNA template. (B) A histogram of ssDNA helicase translocation rate. Data were pooled from many measurements, and the pooled histogram was well fit by a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 322 nt/s and a standard deviation of 62 nt/s. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Experimental Method for the Determination of Helicase Unwinding Velocity under a Constant Force and a Typical Data Set The experimental procedures were: (1) mechanically unwind ∼400 bp of dsDNA to produce a ssDNA loading region, (2) maintain the DNA extension until force drops indicating helicase is unwinding dsDNA at the junction, (3) allow force to continue to drop until force reaches a desired value, and (4) maintain constant force while helicase is unwinding dsDNA. The blue (red) region of the data represents the mechanical (helicase) unwinding. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sequence Dependence of Helicase Unwinding Velocity (A) Instantaneous velocity of helicase along dsDNA template positions under 11 pN force. The measured curve was obtained by averaging 32 single traces. The measured sequence-dependent velocity agreed well with that predicted from an active model. (B) Measured and predicted dsDNA mechanical unwinding force on the same DNA sequence. Unzipping force anticorrelates with the helicase unwinding rate in Figure 5A. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Force-Velocity Measurements during Helicase Unwinding (A) Example traces of helicase unwinding of dsDNA at various forces. Unwinding velocity varied dramatically with the applied force on ssDNA. (B) Measured force-velocity relation and its comparison with predictions based on various models. Measured force-velocity relation deviated significantly from a simple passive model at step sizes (δ) 1, 2, or 3 bp; larger δ only made the deviation larger. In contrast, an active model with δ = 2 bp and destabilization energy ΔGd = 1.2 kBT per bp over a 6 bp range agrees well with the measurements. Also marked on the plot are the ssDNA translocation rate k0 and the minimum (critical) DNA mechanical unwinding force Fc for the given sequence. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Cartoon of Passive and Active Unwinding Mechanisms (A) A sketch illustrating the notation used for modeling the helicase movement toward a fork junction. l is the number of nucleotides between the 5′ end of the ssDNA and the helicase. m is the number nucleotides of the ssDNA that are open between the helicase and the junction. Therefore, n = l + m is the total number of nucleotides from the end of the ssDNA to the junction. M defines the range of interactions between the helicase and the junction in nt. (B) Illustration of the passive unwinding mechanism. In this model the DNA fork thermally fluctuates between dsDNA and ssDNA states (step 1). When the amount of ssDNA between the helicase and the junction is greater than or equal to the helicase step size (δ) the helicase may forward translocate (step 2). (C) Illustration of the active unwinding mechanism. In this model the helicase destabilizes a region (the light blue cloud) of dsDNA near the junction (step 1). This makes the junction more likely to be open so that the helicase is able to step forward (step 2) more frequently. (D) A cartoon illustrating the degree of activeness in DNA unwinding by helicase. When ΔGd=0, the helicase may be considered “strictly” passive, and when ΔGd∼ΔGGC (∼3.4kBT, GC base-pairing energy), “optimally active.” For T7 helicase ΔGd∼1−2kBT. Cell 2007 129, 1299-1309DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.038) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions