Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Takuhiro Ito, Assen Marintchev, Gerhard Wagner  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Structural Characterization of the Boca/Mesd Maturation Factors for LDL-Receptor-Type β Propeller Domains  Mark N. Collins, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen,
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Miklos Guttman, Patrick Weinkam, Andrej Sali, Kelly K. Lee  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2000-2007 (November 2016) A Highly Conserved Yet Flexible Linker Is Part of a Polymorphic Protein-Binding Domain in Myosin-Binding Protein C  Katharine A. Michie, Ann H. Kwan, Chang-Shung Tung, J. Mitchell Guss, Jill Trewhella  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2000-2007 (November 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2016 24, 2000-2007DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Bioinformatics Results (A) Schematic of cMyBP-C. (B) Clustal Omega alignments of PSI-BLAST search data showing the conservation analysis (threshold 40%) of ΔmC2 from Jalview (ClustalX coloring). Numbering refers to the human cardiac MyBP-C sequence. (C) Secondary structure and disorder predictions (H, helix; E, β sheet; D, disorder). See also Tables S1 and S2. Structure 2016 24, 2000-2007DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 NMR Results (A) Ribbon diagram of ΔmC2. The THB (blue), the flexible linker (shown as an extended structure, cyan), and the C2 domain (magenta). Gray spheres indicate locations of mutations in Table S1. (B) The 20 lowest energy structures aligned via the THB (blue cartoon) or C2 (magenta cartoon). (C) Weighted chemical shift changes as Δδ ppm (HN, N) for assigned residues of 15N-labeled ΔmC2 or CaM. Significant changes (red vertical bars) are Δδ values that are 1 or more SD greater than the mean (horizontal red line). Blue bars indicate residues with Δδ values too large to be traced or they disappeared during titration. Yellow bars represent prolines that lack amide protons so provide no data. See also Figures S1, S2, and S4 and Tables S1 and S3. Structure 2016 24, 2000-2007DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SAXS Results (A) I(q) versus q for ΔmC2 (magenta), CaM (wheat), and CaM-ΔmC2 (gray) complex, error bars are 1 SD of propagated counting statistics, although mostly they are smaller than the symbols used to represent the data points. The black line overlaid with the data for ΔmC2 is the ensemble optimization model (EOM) fit to those data. The inset shows Guinier plots with line fits for qRg < 1.3, for the same datasets using the same color key. Data are on an absolute scale, with I(q) values for ΔmC2 and CaM divided by 4 and 2, respectively, for clarity. (B) P(r) versus r corresponding to the I(q) profiles in (A) with the same color key. (C) Ab initio bead models optimized to fit the data in (A) with corresponding color key. (D) Overlay of semi-transparent ab initio models in (C) in two orientations with a cartoon representation of the CaM-ΔmC2 model from Figure 4A. The cartoon representation uses the same color coding as Figure 2 for ΔmC2, with CaM as wheat. The transparent magenta surface results in a red hue to parts of the wheat-colored CaM. See also Table S4 and Figure S3. Structure 2016 24, 2000-2007DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CaM-ΔmC2 Models and Fits to Scattering Data (A and B) CaM-ΔmC2 model built starting with PDB: 2KDU (A) model 5 and (B) model 1 with key contact residues between Δm and CaM highlighted. CaM (wheat colored) is shown as a surface representation, while ΔmC2 is shown as a cartoon with Δm having the same color coding as in Figure 2A. (C) CRYSOL calculated model I(q) fits to the scattering data (black squares, error bars are 1 SD of propagated counting statistics, although mostly they are smaller than the symbols used to represent the data points) for the models in (A) (white line) and (B) (yellow line). Scattering data and model fits are on an absolute scale, with those for model fit (B) multiplied by 5 for clarity. (D) Overlay of the two models in (A) and (B) in a cartoon representation. Color coding is dark blue/cyan/magenta/wheat or light blue/teal/light pink/orange for the THB, linker, and CaM for models in (A) and (B), respectively. Ser362 is highlighted as cyan spheres, and the CaM-bound Ca2+ as yellow spheres. See also Tables S4 and S5 and Figures S4 and S5. Structure 2016 24, 2000-2007DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.08.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions