OBSS Preamble Detection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
OFDMA performance in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
MAC Simulator Calibration Results
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Proposed Rate Control For MAC & Integrated Simulator
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
May 2013 May 2014 Proposed Clarifications for MAC calibration section in Simulation Scenario Document Date: Authors: Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei.
Simulation results for
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box 5 Calibration Result
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Potential of Modified Signal Detection Thresholds
Simulation results for
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

OBSS Preamble Detection May 2013 March 2015 OBSS Preamble Detection Date: 2015-02-26 Authors: Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

March 2015 Context In 11-14-1420-01 it was shown that errors on OBSS preambles were very high Scenario 1 with 3 channels Errors around 80-90% In this presentation we check the probability of preamble detection in both scneario 1 and scenario 2 Qualcomm

Simulation Setup: Scneario 1 March 2015 Simulation Setup: Scneario 1 3 channels Chosen to maximize distance between two apartments one 1 channel. 5 STAs per AP 1 antenna per AP & STA Qualcomm

Simulation Parameters March 2015 Simulation Parameters Simulator Type MAC simulator Tx Power (AP/STA) 20/15dBm Antenna Gain (AP/STA) 0/-2 dBi Traffic Model UL full buffer BSS Bandwidth 80MHz Noise Figure Noise Floor -101dBm per 20MHz Rate Control Algorithm single MCS chosen per link to maximize goodput MSDU size (bytes) 1476 TXOP size 4 ms Max Retx 10 Simulation Time (sec) PER Curve AWGN Qualcomm

Throughput results March 2015 Preamble Detection ON for all packets Premable Detection ON only for in-BSS packets CCA 5% 50% 90% Mean -52 0.32 17.46 63.51 26.28 -62 0.83 25.38 63.95 29.89 -72 2.17 28.18 56.03 30.36 -82 24.55 70.19 32.24 -92 0.77 20.58 61.56 27 CCA 5% 50% 90% Mean -52 0.40 18.88 71.15 29.41 -62 0.32 26.00 70.30 31.87 -72 1.89 31.66 60.97 32.72 -82 0.89 28.63 81.53 35.83 -92 1.05 21.98 67.90 30.10 Shape of curves remains the same regardless of whether Preamble Detection is ON or OFF for OBSS packets Note:having premable detection “OFF” for OBSS packets is like “OBSS color scheme” Qualcomm

Preamble Detection Results March 2015 Preamble Detection Results Median number of OBSS packets detected per second is 5 Equivalent to 20ms deferral out of 1000ms (Txop=4ms) 2% of the time spent deferring due to OBSS premables. Qualcomm

Preamble Detection Results cont. March 2015 Preamble Detection Results cont. % of successfully decoded OBSS preambles by all STAs in a BSS Total successfully decoded preambles in BSS/Total attempted decodes of preambles in BSS A device has an “attempted decode” of a preamble if the preamble is > -82 RSSI, and the device locks on to the preamble and tries to decode it.  roughly 10% decode rate for OBSS premabels Qualcomm

Simulation Setup: Scenario 2 March 2015 Simulation Setup: Scenario 2 “one room” 1 2 4 3 5 6 8 7 9 10 12 11 13 14 16 15 17 18 20 19 21 22 24 23 25 26 28 27 29 30 32 31 4 channels 5 STAs per AP 1 antenna per AP & STA Qualcomm

Simulation Parameters March 2015 Simulation Parameters Simulator Type MAC simulator Tx Power (AP/STA) 20/15dBm Antenna Gain (AP/STA) 0/-2 dBi Traffic Model UL full buffer BSS Bandwidth 80MHz Noise Figure Noise Floor -101dBm per 20MHz Rate Control Algorithm single MCS chosen per link to maximize goodput MSDU size (bytes) 1476 TXOP size 4 ms Max Retx 10 Simulation Time (sec) PER Curve AWGN Qualcomm

Throughput results March 2015 Whether premable detection is on for OBSS packets or not, shape of curve is similar. The ED level is the main factor affecting the shape of the tput curves If OBSS preambles were detected, the dotted black line should match the purple curve Qualcomm

Preamble Detection Results cont. March 2015 Preamble Detection Results cont. % of successfully decoded OBSS preambles by all STAs in a BSS Total successfully decoded preambles in BSS/Total attempted decodes of preambles in BSS A device has an “attempted decode” of a preamble if the preamble is > -82 RSSI, and the device locks on to the preamble and tries to decode it.  roughly 10% decode rate for OBSS premabels Qualcomm

March 2015 Conclusions For the simulation run in scenario 1 and scneario 2, OBSS preambles are not decoded very often. Around 10% of attempted decodes of OBSS preambles are successful This corroborates the results found in 11-14-1420-01 Could impact protocols that rely on preamble detection Qualcomm

Appendix Scenario 1, reuse 1, 1DL March 2015 Same parameters as sceneario 1, reuse 3 Turning Preamble Detection ON for OBSS packets doesn’t change the shape of the tput curve. ED No PD ED No PD ED No PD ED No PD ED No PD ED PD ON Qualcomm