Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Advertisements

Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Kings Mountain Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular.

STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.

Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?

Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)

Freeman Elementary…state of the school.. Freeman Building Wide Goals Reading:  By May 2013, the percentage of K-2 students achieving benchmark standards.

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.

Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.

District Accountability Update May February 2007.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.

Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.

Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005.

Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.

ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.

Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September

SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.

BOE Presentation Assessment Update Trend Data for USD261 SOE.

ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.

ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.

ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.

Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.

NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.

MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.

Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 

ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.

Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.

1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.

IOWA ASSESSMENTS – RED OAK RESULTS JANUARY THIS IS ALL STUDENTS NOT JUST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR – WHICH IS USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%

University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS James Madison Middle School MSA Data Presentation 2012 Marcie L. Gray, Testing Coordinator Courtney.

Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.

Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.

1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December

Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17

Accountability in California Before and After NCLB

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

2012 Accountability Determinations

What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.

Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010

STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions

Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program

Wade Hayashida Local District 8

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report

Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress

Central City Elementary School

Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School

2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director

Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School

Presentation transcript:

Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results 2013-2014 Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results

Alaska State Performance Index (ASPI) NCLB Waiver ASPI replaced AYP 100 point scale 5 per demographic group 5 star rating Baranof/Keet: Blatchley/Reach: Pacific High School:

Considerations Annual Measurable Objectives are: Reading 88.30% Writing 83.00% Math 75.10% 10th grade HSGQE and SBA results are separated even though the test is the same Subgroups require 25 students before results are shared AMO: Annual Measurable Objective- the percent of students that must be proficient to meet AYP

Standards Based Assessment (SBA)

SBA Data- SSD Compared to State Reading % Proficient A greater percentage of SSD students scored Proficient-Advanced in Reading than students from around the state. CELEBRATION

CELEBRATION Writing % Proficient A greater percentage of SSD students scored Proficient-Advanced in Writing than students from around the state. CELEBRATION

CELEBRATION Math % Proficient A higher number of Sitka students scored Proficient-Advanced in Math in grades 3-9 than the number of students from around the state. CELEBRATION

Science % Proficient Except for 10th grade, a higher number of Sitka students scored Proficient-Advanced in Science than the number of students from around the state.

BES/KGH: SBA % Proficient/Advanced

BMS: SBA % Proficient/ Advanced

SHS: SBA % Proficient/ Advanced

District Date Grades 3-10

2012-2014 Comparisons The 2014 results indicate that in all content areas, except Science, the same or a higher number of SSD student scored Proficient-Advanced than the number of SSD students from the previous year. A greater number of Sitka students are scoring Proficient-Advanced in all testing areas as compared to student from across the state.

Reading Grades 3-10

Writing Grades 3-10

Math Grades 3-10

2012-2014 Science Comparison A higher number of SSD students in grades 4 and 8 scored Proficient-Advanced than students from the state.

SUCCESS!!!! Sitka students continue to make gains as compared to student across the state in the areas of Reading, Writing, and Math

HSGQE Results

SHS HSGQE Year to Year Fewer Sitka High students scored Proficient-Advanced on the HSGQE in 2014 than in 2013.

ASPI Breakdown of Calculations

Keet Gooshi Heen & Baranof Elementary 100% Growth in Subgroups 12-13 4 Stars

Blatchley Middle School Growth in all subpopulations. 12-13 4 Stars

Sitka High School 2012-2013 3 Star

Pacific High School 1 Star to 3 Star Status Priority School Status to Focus School Status 2012-2013 1 Star

Sitka Correspondence 2012-2013 4 Star

Questions? Comments