GENESYS Current Functionality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Monte Carlo Simulation
Advertisements

ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
1 Managing Uncertainty in Generation, Inventory and Revenue January 23, 2011 AMS Meeting AMS SHORT COURSE: HYDROLOGIC PREDICTION AND VERIFICATION TECHNIQUES.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Resource Adequacy Forum 2019 Adequacy Assessment Overview PNGC Offices June 28, 2013.
Genesys Model Enhancements October 4, 2011 NW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting Gwendolyn S Shearer.
05/14/2014 Flexibility Methods Workgroup. 2 © 2014 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview/Agenda Discussion of Literature.
EE535: Renewable Energy: Systems, Technology & Economics
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
Colombian Firm Energy Market: Discussion and Simulation Peter Cramton (joint with Steven Stoft and Jeffrey West) 9 August 2006.
Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N June 2011 Non-Treaty Storage Agreement non-Binding Terms for Storage Accounts.
Work Plan Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee July 29, 2009.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Sustained Hydro Peaking Capacity Contract with Don Long Finalizing Phase II SOW Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23,
Developing Synthetic Temperature-Correlated Wind Generation Data Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
RFPEG2013 PRE-BID MEETING RFPEG2013 – Pre-Bid meeting January 9, 2014 Presentation by Derek Davis – Public Utilities Commission.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Steering Committee Meeting March 9, Why talk about assumptions? Garbage in, garbage out! “Let’s go dumpster diving!” Results sensitive to key.
Modeling the Hydroelectric System in GENESYS Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 25, 2007.
2021 Adequacy Assessment Data Requirements Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Technical Committee Meeting March 18, 2016.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
CE 3372 Water Systems design
GENESYS Redevelopment
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
ME 312 PPE POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Lecture 15 Economic Dispatch Tom Overbye and Ross Baldick 1.
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Interim Results Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 28, 2010.
Financial benefits of solar and wind power in South Africa in 2015
INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
Technical Committee Meeting January 27, 2012
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Planning Reserve Margin
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011
Weekly System Status week 34 (19/08/2019 – 25/08/2019) System Operator
Simulated vs. Real Hourly Dispatch Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Weekly System Status week 28 (08/07/2019 – 14/07/2019) System Operator
Weekly System Status week 37 (09/09/2019 – 15/09/2019) System Operator
Weekly System Status week 38 (16/09/2019 – 22/09/2019) System Operator
Presentation transcript:

GENESYS Current Functionality GENESYS Redevelopment Stakeholder Meeting March 17, 2016

Why Review Current State? GENESYS – GENeration Evaluation SYStem Multiple Users – Currently used by the Council, BPA and other regional stakeholders. Multiple Uses – Used for annual regional adequacy assessments, regulated hydro flow studies, and analysis of lost revenue due to hydro dispatch change. Needs to be discussed out explicitly 1) Prevent leaving important functionality behind. 2) Challenging because different users use the model to support a variety of analytics. Multiple Users – Currently used by the Council, BPA and other regional stakeholders. Multiple Uses – Used for annual regional adequacy assessments, regulated hydro flow studies, and analysis of lost revenue due to hydro dispatch change.

What Does the Model Do Now? Performs hourly simulation of FCRPS hydro and regional thermal resource generation under varying stochastic inputs: Temperature variation (load) Wind generation Water supply Thermal forced outages. Incorporates constraints on FCRPS, transmission, and limited external market supply. The dispatch of resources is actually accomplished using resource stacking instead of evaluating each resource against a set electricity market price.

Periodic Hydro Block Evaluation HydSim is run four times to create these 5 Hydro blocks based on the rule curves for each modified streamflow condition. This chart illustrates the use of rule curves to guide the operation of the hydroelectric projects more graphically. For any given month, the rule curve elevations can be “painted” onto the dam itself. The water behind the dam can then be separated into volumes or “blocks.” Water above the flood control curve is very cheap because it would have to be evacuated even in the absence of a market for that electricity. Water below the critical rule curve is very, very expensive and can only be used in emergency situations and only for a short time. The water must then be replaced as soon as possible. Water in the intermediate blocks becomes more valuable the deeper the project is drafted. Each month, every dam is drafted to its refill curve and the corresponding generation is calculated. If more generation from the hydroelectric system is desired, every dam is further drafted to its actual energy regulation curve. If this is still insufficient then all projects are again further drafted to their respective critical rule curves. To “zero in” on the desired amount of hydroelectric energy, the system is drafted “proportionally” between rule curves.

Functional Simulation Flow For each Period Get hydro block sizes Build resource stack Build load stack Hydro and thermal energy for month If deficit, allow purchase-ahead for the month For each window If deficit, allow purchase-ahead for the window Window hydro-thermal energy = period load times (historical average window load/period load) For each day Daily hydro-thermal energy = window load times (daily load/window load) If deficit, allow purchase-ahead for the day Period: For a particular hydro, load and wind sample the simulation starts. Forced outages are simulated in the hourly step. Load here is actually load net wind net long term obligations. For each hour Available hourly hydro energy from shaping the daily energy into the hourly shapes constrained by the peak vs. energy curves Hourly hydro is dispatched dynamically with thermal resources If deficit, can use remaining market and then borrowed hydro.

How Does It Simulate Hourly? Daily Window Period October Week 1 Sunday 1 2 ... 23 24 Saturday Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Emergency Resources This is an example for October.

Resource Stacking Order Description Firm Hydro and Thermal From lowest to highest operating cost Non-firm and Markets In-region and out-of-region markets, surplus hydro, borrowed hydro Standby Resources Type 1 Distributed Standby Generation, Pumped Hydro, ... Type 2 Demand Response Emergency Action 1 More expensive non-declared resources or contract provisions Action 2 Governor’s call for conservation Action 3 Rolling black outs or brown outs Modeled in GENESYS Modeled in Post Processor Not Modeled

Model Outputs for Adequacy Studies Adequacy metrics (LOLP, CVaR, EUE, LOLH, etc.) Calculates frequency, duration and magnitude of events. Regional reliance on market and standby resources Monthly assessment of potential shortfalls Provides insight into conditions under which events occur

Model Outputs for Regulated Hydro and Lost Revenue Studies Regulated Hydro Studies Generation Bypass Spill Reservoir Elevations Regulated Flows Lost Revenue Compare generation under two different input assumptions.

Discuss Other Uses of GENESYS? BPA Other Stakeholders