Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
Advertisements

New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
Transportation Air Pollution. Air Pollution – Sources.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
1 CE Air Pollution Control Regulations and Philosophies Jeff Kuo, Ph.D., P.E.
Implications of Proposed Ozone Standards in Southeast Missouri (SEM) SMRPC Meeting, Perryville, MO April 24, 2015 Joletta Golik.
Commanding Clean Air The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act.
Indiana Energy Association Environmental Issues Impacting Coal Fired Power Plants September 12, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department.
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
Home sweet home... Or is it???? Breathing! Some basics.
1 airpointer ® applications and markets. 2 Main advantages of the airpointer: flexibility, ease of installation and transportation turn key system energy.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Presentation to Air & Waste Management Association Louisiana Section by Mike D. McDaniel, Ph.D. Executive Director October 29, 2014 MMCD 29OCT14 INNOVATIVE.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Air Quality Program Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 9/12/
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Keeping Tomorrow’s Air Clean: Conforming Transportation Plans with Air Quality Attainment Efforts San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
An Overview of Environmental Issues Affecting the Energy Industry December 13, 2010 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Initial task : examine the impacts air pollution governance in Houston in the transportation sector What is the structure of air pollution governance.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
EPA Proposed Ground-level Ozone (O 3 ) NAAQS Rich McAllister National Tribal Air Association Policy Advisory Committee Hobbs Straus Dean & Walker.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection National Ambient Air Quality Standards being Strengthened --Implications for Northeast Florida-- Larry George.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Smog/Ground level ozone
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Air Pollution Prevention
Congressional Clean Air Act Forum
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
High ozone levels in the Tri Cities
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Clean Air Act of 1963 By: Brian Bae Period 4.
by: Christine Dao Per. 2 11/18/10
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
High ozone levels in the Tri Cities
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Ground-level Ozone (O3)
Ozone in the Tri Cities August 2018.
DOGM Collaborative Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018

Smog – Ground Level Ozone

Ozone in the Tri Cities - a brief history: 2013 – AirPact (model) showed potential for high ozone in Kennewick 2014 – Temporary Monitor on Kellogg; mobile monitoring 2015 – Permanent Monitor installed at BCAA offices; additional mobile monitoring 2015 – National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone reduced to 70 ppb from 75 ppb 2016 – Precursor Study 2017 – Precursor Study Completed; Kennewick ozone values continue to be of concern 2018 – Community outreach

Areas of the country projected to have ozone issues: The Tri Cities is not on this map!

Local geography is part of the situation:

Area of interest: Franklin County Dept. of Ecology Benton County Nuclear Program Industrial Unit Eastern Regional Office Benton County Walla Walla County Benton Clean Air Agency

Where does Ozone come from?

Sources of NOx

Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds

Summer of 2014 – mobile monitoring

August 13, 2015 (77 ppb)

Permanent Monitor Installed at BCAA in 2015 7/29 7/30 7/31 8/11 8/12 8/13

Timeline Oct. 1, 2015 EPA finalizes 2015 Ozone NAAQS Oct. 1, 2016 October submission requested that Kennewick be declared “unclassifiable” as there are insufficient data to do otherwise Oct. 1, 2017 EPA finalizes designations based on 2014-2016 DVs Kennewick considered unclassifiable (this is good news) May 2017 and forward If monitor readings continue to exceed the standard, there is potential that the area represented by the Kennewick monitor could be declared in non-attainment. (Benton, Franklin, Walla Walla) 2018 Community Outreach to begin to consider ramifications of non attainment and how we might develop solutions Local Entities explore strategies: Benton Franklin Council of Governments, Benton Clean Air, Department of Ecology, Benton Franklin Transit, Benton Franklin Health Department Oct. 1, 2020 Ozone standard evaluated for revision Oct. 1, 2022 (possible) Non-attainment designation

Affected Communities Regulated Sources Stationary sources of air pollution currently in a permit program: gas stations autobodies food processing chemical plants fertilizer plants Effects of Non-Attainment New Source Review Transportation Infrastructure Transportation projects and planning Transportation Conformity Economic Development Impact on manufacturing/production establishment and expansion Citizens Health impacts of ozone Sensitive populations most affected (elderly, young, cardiovascular conditions, allergies) General Quality of Life Transportation Mobile sources –passenger vehicles, trucking, rail shipping, barge/river shipping Transit Trip management resources Many potential impacts; many potential solutions; community effort – thank you for being here this morning.

Benton Clean Air Agency 526 South Steptoe Street Kennewick, WA 99336 509-783-1304 www.bentoncleanair.org Robin Bresley Priddy, PE

Non Attainment New Source Review Would apply to new or reconstructed sources of NOx and VOC Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate (LAER) The term "lowest achievable emission rate" means for any source, that rate of emissions which reflects: the most stringent emission limitation which is contained in the implementation plan of any State for such class or category of source, unless the owner or operator of the proposed source demonstrates that such limitations are not achievable, or the most stringent emission limitation which is achieved in practice by such class or category of source, whichever is more stringent.  Best Available Control Technology (BACT) is the current standard – it is much more flexible Result of structured analysis on a case by case basis Energy consumption, total source emission, regional environmental impact, and economic costs are taken into account.