GRADING & RELATED ISSUES WORKSHOP : AGGREGATES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Advertisements

Low Volume Road Solutions By: Jason Panter. Seal Coats What is a Seal Coat? – Thin surface treatments – Binder & Aggregates.
High Modulus Asphalt (HiMA) Technology Transfer (T 2 ) November 2010 Progress report Prepared for presentation at the 20 th meeting of the Roads Pavements.
NCHRP Projects 9-25 & 9-31: Findings Related to Surface Cracking FHWA Mixture ETG Washington, DC February 2003 Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC “Engineering.
Concrete & Asphalt. Concrete –Batching – process of proportioning cement, water, aggregates and additives prior to mixing concrete –Concrete specs usually.
Relation between CEN standards and performance based operations By JP Michaut Colas’ Group.
Road Pavement Forum May 2001 Road Materials Committee.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE II Part 1b: Chip Seal Construction Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.
Asphalt Rubber Related Specifications Arizona Department of Transportation.
National Accreditation System for Laboratories  Progress to date  Meeting held on 18 May 1999 under auspices of COLTO RMC & SANAS  Purpose  Chart the.
UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES John Gavens Managing Principal.
TRB AFK10 Committee on General Issues in Asphalt Technology Update on NCAT Test Track and Other Research Results April 24-26, 2006.
Virginia Ready Mix Concrete Association Revisions to Current 2009 Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia.
TOWARDS NEW BITUMEN SPECIFICATIONS RPF – 8/9 MAY 2012 Dennis Rossmann.
Status Report on Standard Specifications and Codes of Practice Department of Transport RPF November 2004.
Bituminous Products Guidelines & Documents Trevor Distin RPF May 2008.
COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Towards National Specifications Road Pavement Forum 07 November 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik.
Kim Jenkins SANRAL Chair in Pavement Eng
Porous Asphalt The Specs Tim Horton, Skillings Connolly Jessica Knickerbocker, City of Tacoma Mark A. Palmer, P.E., LEED AP, City Engineer, City of Puyallup.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT Status Quo Report on Codes of Practice and Specifications 11 May 2005.
RSA Design Guidelines for hot-mix asphalt TRH3/HMA Workshop June 2001.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Design and Manufacture: Unit Assessment at Advanced Higher.
RPF - May 2008 Task Group: Seal Design Input Parameters D Rossmann.
AAPA Q TMR Senior Management Meeting 23 June 2010 – Sustainability - issues & options Sustainability - issues & options Rob Vos Queensland Executive.
Kingsclear Consolidated School Parent / Community Meeting November 29, 2010.
RPF Task Group Feedback Lab Accreditation TG Skills Development TG 11/12 May 2005.
1 Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Arizona - Application and Verification October 3, 2008 Arizona Association of County Engineers.
Session #3 Asphalt 103- Materials: Basics of RAP, Usage and Specifications.
PROGRESS OVERVIEW: COLTO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS TMH AND TRH DOCUMENTS OTHER DOCUMENTS.
RPF Laboratory Accreditation/Verification Task Group RPF meeting 13/14 November 2002.
HiMA TRIAL REPORT AUSTRALIAN TOUR PRESENTED BY WYNAND NORTJE 9 SEPTEMBER 2011.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
REPORT to RPF May 2007 TMH1 Revision Dave Wright.
International Telecommunication Union Geneva, 9(pm)-10 February 2009 BUSINESS USE OF TELECOMUNICATION SECURITY STANDARDS PROJECT Patrick Mwesigwa, Director/Technology.
15 th ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM Mpekweni Beach Resort 6-7 May 2008 Final Session: Resolutions.
Pavement Research Advisory Committee (PRAC) 13 th Meeting of the RPF 8 May 2007.
R52 Rustenburg-Koster Road
REPORT to RPF November 2007 TMH1 Revision & Proficiency Testing Mervyn Henderson TMH1 report prepared by Dave Wright.
Welcome! Directions: Answer the following questions on a blank piece of paper in the Catalyst section of your binder, silently and independently Take out.
1 STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS (TRH; TMH and COLTO) FEEDBACK.
DRE Developing Achievement Levels for FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 A & S October 11, 2011.
1 Protocol Clarification: Section , Resolution of Dispute Notification of Financial Impact of Granted and Granted with Exception Disputes COPS.
15 th RPF 6 – 7 May 2008 Standard test methods for hot mix asphalt.
LLP HMA Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement ( RAP) Pre-Bid Meeting District 4 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement Division.
Grand Palm Hotel and Casino Gaborone, Botswana 15th to 19th Sept 2007 CAPSA 07.
Road Pavement Forum May 2006 Technical Guideline: The use of Modified Bituminous Binders in Road Construction (TG 1: 2001)
Extending the Life of Asphalt Mixes David Lee, P.E. - ARAC Chair, Salem District Materials Kevin McGhee, P.E. – ARAC Secretary, VCTIR.
Simplex Method for BLENDING OF AGGREGATES The contract specifications of a building project require that the course aggregate grading for concrete mixing.
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
Materials & Research Winter Workshop
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Highway Engineering CE 431
Street Improvement Plan
API Spec 6A Tensile Test Yield Offset Requirements
Business Analysis in 3 slides
Panel discussion Date.
February 12 – 19, 2018.
BACK SOLUTION:
Project Name: Country:
Midland Service Improvement Group
D-Lab Fall 2004.
Bituminous Product Specification Changes
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
Swiss MLS10: in-situ validation of recycled hot asphalt mixtures
Senior Project Proposed Solution
Warm Mix Asphalt & Recycled Asphalt Pavements
1. Get specs from customer Cost out the solution Decide discount strategy Assemble proposed response Approve proposed response.
API Specification 6A Keel Block Requirements
Presentation transcript:

GRADING & RELATED ISSUES WORKSHOP : AGGREGATES DEFINING THE ISSUES 5 FEBRUARY 2014

Outline Background Defining the issues

Background Revision of the TMH1 - financed by SANRAL and carried out under the auspices of the Materials Testing Committee (MTC) of the Road Materials Committee (RMC). The revision of TMH1 to SANS3001 necessitated the use of new sieve sizes according to ISO Standards The grading envelope (spec) was not changed in an attempt not to affect the outcome of test results as a grace period was allowed for labs to still use THM1 sieves

Defining the Issues Continuous graded aggregate mixes not affected by implementation of new sieve sizes for grading analysis New grading limits determined through interpolation Example of new specifications according to SANS3001

New Grading Spec for Asphalt

Defining the Issues Single-sized aggregate was affected by implementation of new sieve sizes for grading analysis New grading limits determined through interpolation, BUT Resulted in stricter specifications in order to maintain the same grading envelope as for TMH1 Example of new specifications according to SANS3001

New Grading Spec for Single Sized Aggregate

Proposed Solution Single-sized aggregate: TMH1 envelope to be applied for SANS3001 sieves

Impact of proposed changes Slightly higher ALD’s which is more beneficial for surfacing seals as it allows for higher binder applications Less material wastage

Questions