Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (July 2017)
Advertisements

Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
IFN-γ Primes Keratinocytes for HSV-1–Induced Inflammasome Activation
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Inflammasome responses.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
The NLRP12 Inflammasome Recognizes Yersinia pestis
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
The UPEC Pore-Forming Toxin α-Hemolysin Triggers Proteolysis of Host Proteins to Disrupt Cell Adhesion, Inflammatory, and Survival Pathways  Bijaya K.
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Integrin α5β1 Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome by Direct Interaction with a Bacterial Surface Protein  Hye-Kyoung Jun, Sung-Hoon Lee, Hae-Ri Lee, Bong-Kyu.
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e6 (October 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 150, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 166, Issue 3, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Min Qin, Aslan Pirouz, Myung-Hwa Kim, Stephan R. Krutzik, Hermes J
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e7 (November 2018)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
LPS-induced caspase-11 processing is independent of the NLRP3 and caspase-1 inflammasome. LPS-induced caspase-11 processing is independent of the NLRP3.
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
Min Qin, Aslan Pirouz, Myung-Hwa Kim, Stephan R. Krutzik, Hermes J
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Caspase-11 Requires the Pannexin-1 Channel and the Purinergic P2X7 Pore to Mediate Pyroptosis and Endotoxic Shock  Dahai Yang, Yuan He, Raul Muñoz-Planillo,
A Mutation in the Nlrp3 Gene Causing Inflammasome Hyperactivation Potentiates Th17 Cell-Dominant Immune Responses  Guangxun Meng, Fuping Zhang, Ivan Fuss,
An endogenous caspase-11 ligand elicits interleukin-1 release from living dendritic cells by Ivan Zanoni, Yunhao Tan, Marco Di Gioia, Achille Broggi, Jianbin.
Dangerous Liaisons: Mitochondrial DNA Meets the NLRP3 Inflammasome
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages e7 (February 2018)
Granulin Is a Soluble Cofactor for Toll-like Receptor 9 Signaling
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Human Monocytes Engage an Alternative Inflammasome Pathway
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e5 (November 2018)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Sean P. Cullen, Conor J. Kearney, Danielle M. Clancy, Seamus J. Martin 
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Translocation of a Vibrio cholerae Type VI Secretion Effector Requires Bacterial Endocytosis by Host Cells  Amy T. Ma, Steven McAuley, Stefan Pukatzki,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 35-44.e6 (January 2018) The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secretion from Living Macrophages  Charles L. Evavold, Jianbin Ruan, Yunhao Tan, Shiyu Xia, Hao Wu, Jonathan C. Kagan  Immunity  Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 35-44.e6 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2018 48, 35-44.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 GSDMD Is Required for IL-1β Release when Lysis Is Prevented (A and F) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 3 hr (or were not primed), and then treated with nigericin for 2 hr (A) or Flatox (PA+LFn-Fla) for 2 hr (F). Stimulations contained 0 mM Glycine or 5 mM Glycine. LDH present in the extracellular media was then quantified. (B and G) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 3 hr (or not), and then treated with nigericin for 2 hr or Flatox (2 μg/ml PA and 0.5 μg/ml LFn-Fla) for 2 hr. Stimulations contained 0 mM Glycine or 5 mM Glycine. IL-1β release was monitored by ELISA. (C and H) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 3 hr (or not), and then treated with nigericin for 2 hr or Flatox (PA+LFn-Fla) for 2 hr. Stimulations contained 0 mM Glycine or 5 mM Glycine. PI (5 μM) was added to assay membrane permeability over time. (D and E) Immunoblot analysis of cell-associated (D) or extracellular (E) IL-1β in Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 3 hr of LPS priming (or not) and 30 min of nigericin (N) treatment. Stimulations contained 0 mM Glycine (Gly) or 5 mM Glycine. (I and J) Immunoblot analysis of cell-associated cleaved (I) or extracellular (J) IL-1β in Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 3 hr of LPS priming (or not) and 2 hr of Flatox treatment at 2 μg/ml PA and 0.5 μg/ml LFn-Fla. Data with error bars are represented as mean ± SEM. Each panel is a representative experiment of at least 3 repeats. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 as determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multicomparison correction. UT (Untreated cells). See also Figure S1. Immunity 2018 48, 35-44.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 GSDMD Regulates IL-1β Release in Response to Bacteria and Oxidized Lipids that Hyperactivate Macrophages (A) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA bacteria at an MOI of 10 and 30 for 12 hr. LDH present in the extracellular media was then quantified. (B) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA bacteria at an MOI of 10 and 30 for 12 hr. IL-1β release was monitored by ELISA. (C) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA bacteria at an MOI of 10 and 30 for 12 hr with PI (5 μM) in the culture media during infection. Pore formation was assessed after 12 hr by quantifying PI fluorescence intensity. (D) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA for 12 hr at an MOI 30 for 12 hr. IL-1β release was monitored by ELISA. (E) Immunoblot analysis of cleaved IL-1β in the extracellular media of WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA for 12 hr at an MOI of 10 and 30. (F) Immunoblot analysis of cleaved IL-1β in lysates of WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then infected with SA113 ΔoatA for 12 hr at an MOI of 10 and 30. (G) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then treated with PGN for 6 hr. LDH present in the extracellular media was then quantified. (H) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then treated with PGN for 6 hr. IL-1β release was monitored by ELISA. (I) Immunoblot analysis of cleaved IL-1β in the extracellular media of WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then treated with PGN for 6 hr. (J) Immunoblot analysis of cleaved IL-1β in lysates of Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then treated with PGN for 6 hr. (K) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then treated with PGPC or POVPC for 6 hr. LDH present in the extracellular media was then quantified. (L) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then treated with PGPC or POVPC for 6 hr. IL-1β release was monitored by ELISA. (M) WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs were primed with LPS for 4 hr (or not), and then treated with PGPC or POVPC for 6 hr with PI (5 μM) in the culture media. Pore formation was assessed after 6 hr by quantifying PI fluorescence intensity. (N) Immunoblot analysis of cleaved IL-1β of cell culture supernatants from WT and Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then challenged with PGPC or POVPC for 6 hr. (O) Immunoblot analysis of cell-associated cleaved IL-1β in Gsdmd−/− iBMDMs after 4 hr of LPS priming (or not), and then challenged with PGPC or POVPC for 6 hr. Data with error bars are represented as mean ± SEM. Each panel is a representative experiment of at least 3 repeats. (UT) Untreated cells. See also Figure S2. Immunity 2018 48, 35-44.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hyperactive Stimuli Induce Inflammasome Assembly within Living Macrophages (A) Confocal imaging in the red and green channels of live cell ASC-citrine expressing BMDMs primed with LPS for 3 hr, with second stimulations of nigericin, 5 mM ATP, 50 μg/ml PGN, MOI 30 of SA113 ΔoatA, POVPC, or PGPC for 16–22 hr. Red signal corresponds to MitoTracker Red CMXRos. Green signal corresponds to ASC-citrine fusion protein diffusely cytosolic or oligomerized into inflammasome specks. (B) Enumeration of cells with visible ASC specks that also contain polarized mitochondria as a sign of viability. (n ≥ 25 speck containing cells per condition) (C) Enumeration of cells with visible ASC specks that also phagocytose zymosan particles as a sign of viability. (n ≥ 8 speck containing cells per condition) See also Figure S3. Immunity 2018 48, 35-44.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cleaved GSDMD Acts as a Conduit for the Release of Cytosolic or Encapsulated IL-1 Family Members (A) EGFP signal was monitored by flow cytometry in 293T cells stably expressing IL-1β-tdTomato after electroporation with GSDMD alleles tagged with EGFP. (B) 7-AAD signal was monitored by flow cytometry in 293T cells stably expressing IL-1β-tdTomato after electroporation with GSDMD alleles tagged with EGFP. (C) tdTomato signal was monitored by flow cytometry in 293T cells stably expressing IL-1β-tdTomato after electroporation with GSDMD alleles tagged with EGFP. (D) Representative histogram of tdTomato fluorescence overlays for 0 and 7 hr post electroporation with GSDMD alleles tagged with EGFP. (E–G) EM micrographs of PC:PS unextruded liposomes treated with recombinant GSDMD alone (E) caspase-11 alone (F) or with combined treatment (G). Scale bar equals 50 nm. (H) Immunoblot analysis of IL-1β present within liposomes (pellet), or supernatants after ultracentrifugation of liposomes that were untreated, treated with caspase-11, or treated with caspase-11 and GSDMD for 30 and 120 min. (I) Densitometry quantification of western blot band density for IL-1β release from liposomes. (J) Immunoblot analysis of IL-18 present within liposomes (pellet), or supernatants after ultracentrifugation of liposomes that were untreated, treated with caspase-11, or treated with caspase-11 and GSDMD for 30 and 120 min. (K) Densitometry quantification of western band density for IL-18 release from liposomes. Data with error bars are represented as mean ± SEM. Each panel is a representative experiment of at least 3 repeats. See also Figure S4. Immunity 2018 48, 35-44.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions