TTI Passenger Rail Research Overview Curtis Morgan Program Manager, Rail Research Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) January 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Tysons Transportation: Planning, Analysis, and Design Projects Presented to: Transportation Committee,
Advertisements

Minnesota Passenger Rail Presentation Transportation Finance Advisory Committee presented by: Mn/DOTs Passenger Rail Office May 18, 2012.
Minnesota Intercity Bus Network Study Project Advisory Committee Meeting: June 17, 2009.
Public Transit Division Discretionary Programs Overview January 2011.
NCRRP 03-01: Intercity Passenger Rail Service and Development Guide Curtis Morgan Program Manager Rail Research Program, Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
VA/NC High Speed Rail: Benefits and Challenges January 9, 2012 Trip Pollard.
Emerging California Passenger Rail Corridors A Comparative Look at the Future For Enhanced Passenger Rail in Coachella Valley/Banning Pass and the Delmarva.
Intercity Bus Program: Alternative Strategy for Rural Transport
Transportation and Air Traveler Characteristics Findings from the 2011 Washington-Baltimore Regional Air Passenger Survey Transportation Planning Board.
EU 'urban mobility' policy and the preparations for the 2013 'urban mobility package' Septembre 2013.
John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation Mid-States Highway-Rail Safety Conference.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
Title: Energy and Environmental Benefits of Bus Rapid Transit in APEC Economies Presenter’s Name: Walter Kulyk Economy: United States 35th APEC Transportation.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
Send Lawyers, Trains and Money Passenger Rail Implementation Approaches 7/30/14 NGEC Finance Subcommittee Allan Rutter, Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
New Directions Forward Scott Omer, PTP, Director Multimodal Planning Division Arizona Department of Transportation 2014 AzTA / ADOT Annual Conference April.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Passenger Rail – Plan & Opportunities Engineer Contractor Conference Middleton, WI January 21, 2010.
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
Public Transportation Challenges and Opportunities in Southwestern Ontario Presentation to Southwest Economic Alliance Terry Johnson and Peter Miasek May.
You Are the Traffic Jam: Examination of Congestion Measures
Transportation, Growth and Sustainability Economic Growth with Equity Open Classroom Stephanie Pollack April 1, 2009.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
NATMEC JUNE 5, 2012 DALLAS, TEXAS Improving MPO Decisions With Better Data: Examples in Dallas-Fort Worth Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation.
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.

RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
Background Research on High Speed Rail Kumar and Wencan.
Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Studies in Texas – Current Riders & Potential Future Corridors Curtis Morgan Texas Transportation Institute Southwestern.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Krum Amtrak Stop Status September 21, 2010 Mayor Terri Wilson Krum, TX.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March 15, 2011.
May 25, 2010 Wisconsin High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail From vision to reality MADISON COMMUNITY MEETING John Oimoen, High Speed Passenger Rail Program.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO THE UTILITY OF GENERAL AVIATION TROY D. DOWNENR.
GO Airport Shuttle Don Eames The GO Group, LLC Board Member President/CEO GO The Airport Shuttle AGTA Meeting Ft. Myers, FL.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Improving a world-class facility. TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Designed with passengers in mind Short Walking Distances parking—ticketing---gate gate---bag.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Rail Division State & Federal Funding FY Operations & Facilities.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
Oklahoma City to South Texas Passenger Rail Corridor SCORT Presentation March 2010.
Ohio Statewide Model Passenger Transit Calibration Pat Costinett Greg Erhardt Rebekah Anderson.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Agenda  Enterprise CarShare Overview  How It Works  The Benefits  Why Enterprise CarShare  Q&A 2.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
January 2009 Transportation 2009 Support for transportation choices and alternatives Jon Boyd
Framework for Rail Planning and Project Development.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Title Evaluating the potential for Bus Rapid Transit and MnPASS Express Lanes in the southwest metro Investigating options for improved bus service between.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS MAG Commuter Rail Strategic Plan Transportation Policy Committee December 12, 2007.
Illinois Intrastate Shuttle Sponsor: America’s Central Port, Granite City, Illinois Route: M-55 Marine Highway Route (Illinois River) Project Snapshot:
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
Public transit in Indiana – the path forward November 2012
The Business of Public Transportation
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
State-Supported Passenger Rail Corridor Profiles
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

TTI Passenger Rail Research Overview Curtis Morgan Program Manager, Rail Research Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) January 25, 2013

TTI Passenger Rail Research TTI Multimodal Freight Transportation Division Research Areas: – Intercity Passenger Rail Planning & Policy – High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail – Multimodal Interfaces with Passenger Rail Project Sponsors: – Texas Department of Transportation – U.S. DOT University Transportation Centers – Michigan Department of Transportation

2009 TTI Heartland Flyer Study Objective: Measure Mobility Impacts of Rail Service – Short or Medium Distance State-Supported Corridors – Emphasis on Southwest U.S. Corridors Case Study Route: Heartland Flyer – Oklahoma City, Oklahoma to Fort Worth, Texas – Single Daily Round-Trip, Low-Density Corridor Service – State Financial Support from Oklahoma and Texas On-Board Survey of Heartland Flyer Passengers – Two Survey Waves: April and July 2009 – Measure Diverted and Induced Trips – Measure Economic Impacts-Added

Heartland Flyer Study Results Trip Characteristics: – Primarily Leisure Travelers – 75% of Passengers from OK, 20% from Texas Mobility Impacts: – 60% of Passengers Would Drive if No Rail Service – 30% of Passengers Would Not Make Trip – Reduction of 7.9 Million Annual VMT Economic Impacts: – $18 Million in Passenger Spending – $1.39 Million in Local Sales Tax Revenue – Loss of Service = 30 Percent Reduction in Impacts

2011 Hiawatha Service Study Objective: Examine mobility impacts of passenger rail in multimodal intercity corridor. Hiawatha Service Route: Milwaukee – Chicago Project Participants: – TTI Passenger Rail Research Group – University Transportation Center for Mobility – Wisconsin Department of Transportation Two Major Phases: – On-Board Survey of Hiawatha Service Passengers – Detailed Study of Air-Rail Link at Milwaukee Airport

Hiawatha Service Study Results On-Board Passenger Survey Results: – Primarily Commuter/Business Trips Weekdays, Personal Trips on Weekends – 70% of Passengers Would Drive if No Rail Service – Majority of Passengers from Milwaukee Area Air-Rail Link Passenger Survey Results: – Primarily Leisure Travelers but Some Business Trips – Offers Sustainable Ground Access Option for MKE – MKE Airport is Alternative to Chicago Airports – Passengers Also Connecting to Rental Cars or Other Transportation Options at MKE

TxDOT HSR Program Support TxDOT-TTI Interagency Agreement TTI Assisting TxDOT with HSR Corridor Studies Major TTI Tasks: – Assemble Peer Panel – Generate Compendium of HSR Information – Assistance with Public Outreach – Multimodal Connectivity Potential – Economic Development Potential