Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Seisuke Arai, Yoichi Noda, Satoko Kainuma, Ikuo Wada, Koji Yoda 
Meghal Gandhi, Vérane Achard, Laurent Blanchoin, Bruce L. Goode 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Control of the Assembly of ATP- and ADP-Actin by Formins and Profilin
Nicola Tolliday, Lynn VerPlank, Rong Li  Current Biology 
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Enhanced Depolymerization of Actin Filaments by ADF/Cofilin and Monomer Funneling by Capping Protein Cooperate to Accelerate Barbed-End Growth  Shashank.
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Capping Protein Increases the Rate of Actin-Based Motility by Promoting Filament Nucleation by the Arp2/3 Complex  Orkun Akin, R. Dyche Mullins  Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages (April 2013)
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Architecture Dependence of Actin Filament Network Disassembly
PLA2 and PI3K/PTEN Pathways Act in Parallel to Mediate Chemotaxis
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Caitlin M. McDonold, J. Christopher Fromme  Developmental Cell 
Li Xu, Anthony Bretscher  Current Biology 
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Border Cell Migration Analyzed Using Time- Lapse Live-Cell Imaging  Mohit Prasad, Denise J. Montell  Developmental.
Volume 147, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Andrew R. Wagner, Qing Luan, Su-Ling Liu, Brad J. Nolen 
Michael W. Gramlich, Vitaly A. Klyachko  Cell Reports 
Carl Co, Derek T. Wong, Sarah Gierke, Vicky Chang, Jack Taunton  Cell 
A System of Counteracting Feedback Loops Regulates Cdc42p Activity during Spontaneous Cell Polarization  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak, Attila Becskei, Alexander.
Avital A. Rodal, Amity L. Manning, Bruce L. Goode, David G. Drubin 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
The UCS Domain Protein She4p Binds to Myosin Motor Domains and Is Essential for Class I and Class V Myosin Function  Stefanie Wesche, Marc Arnold, Ralf-Peter.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Profilin Directly Promotes Microtubule Growth through Residues Mutated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis  Jessica L. Henty-Ridilla, M. Angeles Juanes,
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Fanny S. Chang, Christopher J. Stefan, Kendall J. Blumer 
Irina Chernyakov, Felipe Santiago-Tirado, Anthony Bretscher 
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Actin-Filament Stochastic Dynamics Mediated by ADF/Cofilin
Aip1 Destabilizes Cofilin-Saturated Actin Filaments by Severing and Accelerating Monomer Dissociation from Ends  Ambika V. Nadkarni, William M. Brieher 
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast  Stephen A. Proctor, Nicolas Minc,
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Jennifer Y. Hsiao, Lauren M. Goins, Natalie A. Petek, R. Dyche Mullins 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Self-Organization of Minimal Anaphase Spindle Midzone Bundles
How Capping Protein Binds the Barbed End of the Actin Filament
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 217-230 (August 2011) The Myosin Passenger Protein Smy1 Controls Actin Cable Structure and Dynamics by Acting as a Formin Damper  Melissa Chesarone-Cataldo, Christophe Guérin, Jerry H. Yu, Roland Wedlich-Soldner, Laurent Blanchoin, Bruce L. Goode  Developmental Cell  Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 217-230 (August 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Smy1 Inhibits Bnr1 (FH2) Actin Nucleation Activity but Not Processive Capping (A) Monomeric actin (2 μM, 5% pyrene labeled) was polymerized in the presence of 5 nM Bnr1 (FH2) and the indicated concentrations of Smy1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibitory effects of Smy1 on Bnr1. Percent Bnr1 activity was determined by dividing the slope of the actin polymerization curve in the presence of Smy1 by the slope of the curve in the absence of Smy1. (C) Schematic of purified full length and truncated Smy1 polypeptides. Each polypeptide was compared at a range of concentrations for its inhibitory effects on Bnr1 (FH1-FH2-C) in pyrene-actin assays (see Figures S1H–S1J) to determine concentration required for half-maximal inhibition. (D) Time-lapse TIRF microscopy on assembly of 1 μM actin and 3 μM profilin in the presence of control buffer, 1 nM Bnr1 (FH1-FH2-C) and/or 500 nM Smy1 (421–577). (E) Effects of Smy1 and Bud14 on Bnr1-capped actin filament barbed end growth in the presence of capping protein (CP). At time zero, monomeric actin (0.5 μM, 10% pyrene labeled) was added to mechanically sheered unlabelled F-actin seeds (0.3 μM) in the presence of 0.7 nM Bnr1 (FH1-FH2-C) and 500 nM S. cerevisiae CP. At the indicated time point (arrow) either 500 nM Bud14 (179–472) or 500 nM Smy1 (421–577) was added. (F) Effects of Smy1 and Bud14 on Bnr1-capped actin filament barbed end growth in the presence of capping protein (CP) and profilin. Same as in (E), but reactions contained 3 μM profilin. Error bars in all figures denote SD. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Smy1 Slows the Elongation of Bnr1-Capped Actin Filaments TIRF microscopy was used to directly measure the elongation rates of filaments assembled from 1 μM actin and 3 μM profilin in the presence of the indicated proteins or control buffer. (A) Rate of elongation was determined by measuring the distance each filament barbed end elongated during the observation window (600 s). Filaments were grown in the presence of control buffer, 1 nM Bnr1, or 1 nM Bnr1+500 nM Smy1 (421–577). Solid lines correspond to Gaussian fits of the data. (B) Average rate of elongation for each condition was normalized to actin alone (set at one). ∗ = p ≤ 0.0001 as measured by Student's t test. (C and D) Lengths of individual filaments graphed as a function of time during the reactions. Five representative filaments for each condition are shown. (C) Note that for actin alone, 1 nM Bnr1 alone, and 1 nM Bnr1+500 nM Smy1 (421–577), each filament grew at a steady velocity (indicated by the slope of the line). (D) For 1 nM Bnr1 + 500 nM Bud14 (179–472), the velocity of filament growth was observed to change abruptly, consistent with Bnr1 displacement by Bud14 (transition from faster to slower growth) and reassociation of free Bnr1 (transition from slower to faster growth). Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 smy1Δ Causes Bnr1-Dependent Defects in Actin Cable Architecture (A) Representative images of the indicated strains, fixed and stained with Alexa-488 phalloidin. Note the actin cable defects in smy1Δ (yellow arrows), which are suppressed in smy1Δbnr1Δ, whereas compounded defects in actin organization were observed in smy1Δbni1Δ. (B) The indicated yeast strains were serially diluted and compared for growth on YPD medium at 25°C and 37°C. (C) Quantification of “wavy” cable phenotype (cables that changed direction in the mother more than twice), n > 100 cells. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Genetic Evidence that SMY1 and BUD14 Perform Distinct Functions in Regulating BNR1 (A) Representative cells for wild-type, bud14Δ, smy1Δ and bud14Δsmy1Δ strains treated with 20 μM LatA or control buffer for 60 s, fixed and stained with Alexa-488 phalloidin. Note the LatA-resistant actin cables in bud14Δ and bud14Δsmy1Δ cells. (B) Data quantified from at least two independent experiments as in A, n > 100 cells. (C) Yeast strains were serially diluted and compared for growth on YPD medium at 25°C and 37°C. (D) Representative images of the indicated strains grown at 25°C, fixed and stained with Alexa-488 phalloidin. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 smy1Δ Increases Rates of Actin Cable Extension In Vivo TIRF microscopy was used to image live yeast cells expressing Abp140-GFP, a marker for actin cables, and to track extension of actin cables near the cortex in mother cells. Rates of actin cable extension were determined by calculating the distance that the end of a cable extended over time. (A) Scatter plots show the extension rates of each actin cable measured in the indicated strains. Red bars indicate the average rates. (B) Probability density analysis was used to estimate the relative likelihood that cables extend at a given velocity, as described in Experimental Procedures. The data for two strains (bud14Δ and smy1Δbud14Δ) were removed from this graph for simplicity, but are reported in Figure S2. Note the marked depletion of the slowest subset of cable velocities in smy1Δ versus wild-type, and in bni1Δsmy1Δ versus bni1Δ. This suggests that Smy1 is required in cells to maintain the slowest subset of cables. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Tracking of Smy1-3GFP Particle Movements in Living Cells (A) In wild-type cells, Smy1-3GFP particles moved rapidly through the mother cell and paused at the bud neck. Shown are representative grayscale, time-lapse series for two particles tracked. (B) Scatter plot of Smy1-3GFP particle velocities in myo2-0IQ and wild-type strains. Black bars represent mean velocities for each strain, and error bars represent SD. The individual data points have been labeled different shades of gray for clarity. (C) Graph of the distance of individual Smy1-3GFP particles from the bud neck versus time, measured during the course of a 4 s movie. Each of the particles tracked is labeled in a different shade of gray for clarity. Positive numbers indicate movement from the mother compartment toward the bud neck, and negative numbers indicate movement away from the bud neck, into the bud compartment. (D) Quantification of the frequency of Smy1-3GFP particle pausing at the bud neck in both wild-type and bnr1Δ, scored as the percent of cells exhibiting at least one Smy1-3GFP particle “pause” at the bud neck during a 30 s observation period. A pause was defined as any particle that remained at the bud neck for >1.5 s. ∗ = p < .0002, as measured by the Student's t test. (E) Strains were grown at 25°C to log phase, fixed and either stained with Alex-488 phalloidin to visualize F-actin or directly imaged for GFP signal. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Overexpression of Smy1 (421–577) Inhibits Bnr1-Mediated Actin Cable Assembly (A) Actin organization defects caused by GAL overexpression of Smy1 (421–577) in wild-type, bni1Δ and bnr1Δ strains. Cells were induced with galactose overnight, fixed, and stained with Alexa-488 phalloidin. (B) To quantify the effects of Smy1 (421–577) overexpression on wild-type and bnr1Δ actin cables, we measured the intensity of Alexa-488 phalloidin staining in the mother cell for the indicated strains. (C) Localization of Bnr1-GFP to the neck was unaffected by overexpression of Smy1 (421–577). (D) A model for Smy1 regulation of Bnr1-mediated actin cable assembly. Bnr1 (green) is tethered to the bud neck and polymerizes actin filaments that are incorporated into extending cables. The filaments in cables become decorated with tropomyosin (pink) and bundling proteins (turquoise), which maintain filament organization and stability. Myosin-V (Myo2 in yeast, red) rapidly transports secretory vesicles and Smy1 (purple) on actin cables to the bud neck, where Smy1 transiently interacts with Bnr1 to reduce the speed of actin cable extension and prevent cable overgrowth. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 217-230DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.004) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions