Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Advertisements

Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
An appeal to ignorance is an argument for or against a proposition on the basis of a lack of evidence against or for it. If there is positive evidence.
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events SettingQuoteSignificance
The Crucible Bellringer #7 8/22/12
THIS IS With Hosts... Your Name the character Plot Who said it? Why did they say it? EmptyPlot II.
$100$200$100$300$100$200 $400 $200$200$400 $100 $400 $100$400 $500 $200$500 $300$500$300$300$500$300$400 $500.
Appeal to Fear/ Scare Tactics
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
Nov 21 – Jr American Lit You will need: The Crucible - Act I Agenda:
Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy By: Cole Mutter & Ashley Hart.
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
Circular Reasoning By: Logan Witty and Kacie Martin.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
The Crucible Act II. Elizabeth urges John to go to Salem to tell the court that Abigail’s story is a hoax. People fear Abigail’s power to accuse them.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
ACT ONE Questions Level 1 Name ________________ Date________.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By: Ella Settle. DOGMATISM The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions.
1. How much time has passed since Act I? 8 Days.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
Students will understand what causes the flaws in the justice system in Act III.
What really happened in the woods? If you believe what Abigail tells her Uncle Parris… It was just Betty and I in the woods. We were just dancing. What.
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Ad Hominem April Reprogle Brian Hodges Kayce Russell.
CharactersCourtAccusationsQuotesMisc
The Crucible Act II – part 1 RECAP Read about semicolons ON PAGE 7; Then complete pages 7&8.
The Crucible Characterisation- Act One. Reverend Parris “evidently in prayer” “evidently in prayer” “seems about to weep” “seems about to weep” Look at.
Paper Topics Writing a letter From one character to another
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
The Crucible Act II.
The Crucible Acts I & II Review Women of Salem Say what? Act I Act IIMen of Salem
BEGGING THE QUESTION/ CIRCULAR REASONING BY: Jessica Greenwood And McKenzie Pedigo.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
What Is Dogmatism? Dogmatism is the tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others.
Crucible Act I.
Act III Comprehension Questions
The Crucible Acts I & II Review
The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Appeal to Ignorance Justus, John, Nick.
Abigail Motivations: -Lust for Proctor- Self preservation-Fear-
The Crucible: Act I Qs.
Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.
TOD and discussion questions
THE CRUCIBLE ACT II.
Circular Reasoning/Begging the Question
Argument From False Authority Fallacy
Characters Events Themes Misc. Misc. II 1pt 1 pt 1 pt 1pt 1 pt 2 pt
Characterization When a writer wants to describe a character to the reader, he or she can do it a couple of different ways: Direct characterization – the.
Who wants to be a Millionaire?
The Cruicble Red Herring fallacies
By: Skyla Robbins & Caitlin Ramsey
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy
The Crucible Act II Review.
The Crucible fallacy project
Appeal to Fear/ Scare Tactics
The Crucible Act II.
Question & Answer Review Game Designed for Use in the Classroom
Dogmatism By: Taylor Montgomery.
Appeal to Ignorance By: Amber Cline.
The crucible – Act Two What do you know so far?.
The Crucible Act II.
The Crucible Act I Review
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/False Dichotomy
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
The Crucible Test Review
Presentation transcript:

Appeal to Ignorance A fallacy based on the assumption that a statement must be true if it cannot be proved false.

Universal Example Appeal to ignorance can often be found in debates about conspiracies such as aliens, mythology, or even religion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HABNe7_D22k MLA: “Tide - You can't explain that Bill O'Reilly” Youtube. Youtube, 2 July, 2011. Web. 20 April, 2014.

Mrs. Putnam: “Why, it’s sure she did. Mr Mrs. Putnam: “Why, it’s sure she did. Mr. Collins saw her going over Ingersoll’s barn, and come down light as a bird, he says.” … Mrs. Putnam: “How high did she fly, how high?” Parris: “No, no, she never flew-” (act 1, P.172) Mrs. Putnam is asking how high Betty flew. Parris does not know how high it was; therefore, he cannot know if she flew or not. He also does not know if she is telling the truth about what Mr. Collins said, and she herself cannot know if Mr. Collins was lying.

“Mary- you charge a cold and cruel murder on Abigail. ” (Pg “Mary- you charge a cold and cruel murder on Abigail.” (Pg. 203, Act 2) Cheever and Hale appeal to the ignorance of Mary, John and Elizabeth because none of them know both sides. They cannot prove their own innocence because they know nothing about what happened to Abigail. They cannot prove they had nothing to do with it, so obviously, they did.

“Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” – Carl Sagan