Thinking about progress monitoring: Decisions and instructional change strategies Dr. Lisa Habedank Stewart Minnesota State Univ Moorhead 218.477.4081.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
Data Based Decision Making
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
STEEP Data Management Ease, Reliability, Power. STEEP Data Management Goal: Make it simple to implement RTI correctly –Select Students who Need Intervention.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
RTI & Classwide Instruction
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Judy Rockley September 2012  Based on student data interventions are chosen from a list of scientifically based programs that are.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Using Data for Decisions Points to Ponder. Different Types of Assessments Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) Guided Reading (Leveled Reading) Statewide.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Progress Monitoring Strategies for Writing Individual Goals in General Curriculum and More Frequent Formative Evaluation Mark Shinn, Ph.D. Lisa A. Langell,
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Shelly Dickinson, MTSS Trainer Charlie Eccleston, MTSS Trainer.
Collaborative Problem Solving… Shifting to a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model  A year of change for us all  We will learn together as a TEAM  The.
Oregon Response to Intervention Mathematics and RTI Research, Review, and The Beginning of State Support Tammy Rasmussen Oregon RTIi.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Types of Assessment: Curriculum Based Measurement Characteristics : Simple Accurate Efficient Generalizable Reliable and valid Predictive Sensitive Flexible.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Welcome Everyone!. Informal Agenda  Quick Trip With Jo Beck on navigating WebEx  Who you are and what you hope to get out of being a cohort  RTI/Measurement.
Training Modules  Participants will understand… Progress Monitoring Graphing Data Data-Based Decisions Linking Cases to PS/RtI.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Progress Monitoring Presented By: Bart Lyman. Aimsweb Progress Monitoring Guide-Pearson 2012 RTI Implementer Series: Module 2: Progress Monitoring Training.
Response to Intervention – A Good IDEIA
RTI – Response to Intervention
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Group Intervention Review (20% Meetings)
Response to Intervention
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Overview
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Tier 1 Building a Strong Core.
Data Usage Response to Intervention
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Thinking about progress monitoring: Decisions and instructional change strategies Dr. Lisa Habedank Stewart Minnesota State Univ Moorhead
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Lake Myra Elementary School * July 2009
Positive Behavior Support
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Data-Based Decision Making
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Thinking about progress monitoring: Decisions and instructional change strategies Dr. Lisa Habedank Stewart Minnesota State Univ Moorhead 218.477.4081 stewart@mnstate.edu 1:15-3:30pm

My Assumptions about Progress Monitoring in RTI Data-based decision making improves student outcomes The more “at risk” a student is (and the more intensive our interventions) the more important frequent progress monitoring becomes Not all CBM measures and not all DIBELS have adequate reliability and validity!

“Good” Progress Monitoring Progress monitoring uses: reliable, valid measures tied to important educational outcomes Need long term measurement, not just short term/mastery sensitive to student growth given frequently (1 to 4x per month) My examples will be using General Outcome Measures of CBM or DIBELS in Reading Data are collected with fidelity Sensitivity is part of validity but warrants its own mention when discussing progress monitoring…. Also, brief, cheap, etc…. But those are practical issues.

Why is Progress Monitoring Important? We do NOT KNOW ahead of time whether an intervention will be successful for an individual student Do they assume in the hospital that your heart is working just fine after your bypass surgery? After all… the surgery works well for MOST patients….. Need to be Efficient and Effective with our time…. Some of these students are in academic intensive care!… and some just have a cold, but that could turn into pneumonia if we don’t watch it and do the right thing….

Individual Progress Data are CRITICAL: Small Group Segmenting Progress (02-03) Benchmark = 35-45 Spring K Note: K n=5, Gr1 n=5, 02-03 Credit: Moorhead Am Indian Prereferral Project

Segmenting – Individual Results from the Same Small Groups… Even though the intervention was effective “overall” or on average, Student who started the highest (purple) didn’t make progress…. Neither did the lowest student…. Credit: Moorhead Am Indian Prereferral Project

A comment on materials… In READING When possible, students are monitored using grade level materials If this is not possible due to frustration or lack of sensitivity, “test down” and use the highest grade level of measures possible Periodically “check” how the student is doing on grade-level materials and move into grade level materials as soon as possible Instructional level may be different again!!! In Math… may be different….

Systems for “Using” the data Culture of professionalism and using data to inform decisions Easy access to data and reports Time set aside to look at and “use” the data Professional Development in data collection and use Professional development and support in learning new and varied interventions

Use Graphs! Label them as clearly as possible, treat as confidential data,

Looking at the Graphs Is there “go upness”???? Is there ENOUGH “go upness”????

Basic Visual Analysis: “Go Upness”?

Aimline Shows general trajectory needed for student to reach his/her goal Typically set so student gets back “on target” within a set amount of time (e.g., by the end of the year)

Using an Aimline

Data Decision Guidelines If the student has some data points above and some below the aimline (doing the “aimline hug”), keep doing what you are doing! If the student has 4 consecutive data points above the aimline, consider moving the student to less intervention (e.g., decreasing minutes, or moving from Tier 2 to Tier 1 or Tier 3 to Tier 2) Also use other pieces of information Continue to progress monitor

Data Decision Guidelines Cont’d If the student has 4 consecutive data points below the aimline, ASK THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS (and continue to progress monitor): What does the “other” evidence available suggest about the student’s progress? Error rates? Behavior during the intervention? What is the general “trend” of the data? Is the student likely to get where we want if this continues? Use visual analysis and other evidence Use “trendlines” and “aimlines”

Trendline Shows the general “trend” or trajectory of the student’s data so far Web-based Programs typically use an OLS regression line WARNING! Trendlines on few data points or on highly variable data are NOT reliable!!!

Refer to Christ et al article

How much progress is “enough”? What is “adequate” progress? Criterion referenced Norm referenced Individually referenced “Intervention”/research referenced

Remember to use your brain! (and eyes and ears) These are guidelines, THINKING is REQUIRED… If overall trend of progress is good but s/he happens to have 4 data points just barely below the aimline, you may decide to continue your intervention for a week and see what happens. Use Convergence of Data (teacher report, mastery monitoring, behavioral indicators)

Practice Exercises: More in actual presentation…

What if there isn’t adequate progress? If you keep doing what you’ve been doing then you will keep getting what you’ve got.

Back to Problem Solving

What if there isn’t adequate progress? Is the intervention being done with fidelity? Has fidelity check been done? Is the student in the right level of materials? Has the student been in school? Are they getting enough minutes of intervention per week?

What if there isn’t adequate progress? Cont’d Should the intervention be “tweaked”? changed? Is there an intervention better “matched” to this student’s needs? Changes could include trying a different intervention or just “tweaking” the current intervention such as adding a 5th repeat to a repeated reading or a sticker incentive for accurate reading Grade level or prob solving team members work together to discuss the data, the student, and what intervention changes would have the best chance of success Whether to tweak or change depends, in part, on how concerned you are…..

Problem Analysis: What do we know? RIOT and ICEL

Instructional Procedures What could we change? Instructional Procedures   Materials Arrange ments Time Motiva tional Strategies Focus or Skill Teaching Strategies

What could we change? Focus or skill Teaching strategies Materials more explicit, more practice, more previewing, better matched with core Materials Easier, better matched (cultural, interests, etc) Arrangements Size group, location, Who is teaching? Time Amount of time, days per week, time of day Motivation Interests, goals, rewards, home/school Could use any basic teaching best practices framework…. BUT HAVE ONE!!!

Examples: Tatianna, Grade 2 Adam, Grade 4 initial reading intervention (practice) not working…. Adam, Grade 4 20 min per day of intervention not working….attention and motivation issues. More info for this activity in presentation/activity for participants.

Resources Web Resources Print Resources www.studentprogress.org http://www.rti4success.org/ click on Progress monitoring on right side www.interventioncentral.org look for information on CBM, graphing, etc Print Resources Riley-Tillman & Burns (2009) Evaluating Educational Interventions. Guilford Press Safer & Fleishman (2005).. Educational Leadership 62(5) 81-83. Research Matters: How Student Progress Monitoring Improves Instruction 29