V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Advertisements

A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Contribution of VH Gene Replacement to the Primary B Cell Repertoire
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
RAG Proteins Shepherd Double-Strand Breaks to a Specific Pathway, Suppressing Error-Prone Repair, but RAG Nicking Initiates Homologous Recombination 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
V(D)J Recombination in Ku86-Deficient Mice: Distinct Effects on Coding, Signal, and Hybrid Joint Formation  Molly A Bogue, Chiyu Wang, Chengming Zhu,
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Epigenetics Drives RAGs to Recombination Riches
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Jinhak Lee, Stephen Desiderio  Immunity 
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Yeast Origins Establish a Strand Bias for Replicational Mutagenesis
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
The Mutagenesis Proteins UmuD′ and UmuC Prevent Lethal Frameshifts While Increasing Base Substitution Mutations  Nina Bacher Reuven, Guy Tomer, Zvi Livneh 
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
A Multi-Exonic BRCA1 Deletion Identified in Multiple Families through Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Haplotype Pair Analysis and Gene Amplification with.
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
LexA Cleavage Is Required for CTX Prophage Induction
Coding Joint Formation in a Cell-Free V(D)J Recombination System
An Autoregulatory Mechanism Imposes Allosteric Control on the V(D)J Recombinase by Histone H3 Methylation  Chao Lu, Alyssa Ward, John Bettridge, Yun Liu,
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages (August 2000)
XRCC3 Controls the Fidelity of Homologous Recombination
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast Anne E. Clatworthy, Maria A. Valencia, James E. Haber, Marjorie A. Oettinger  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 489-499 (August 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00305-8

Figure 1 Reconstitution of V(D)J Reactions in Yeast with RAG1, RAG2, and a Recombination Substrate (A) Schematic diagrams of high copy plasmids used to transform yeast. Substrate plasmid pACY16 contains a 12RSS (white triangle) and 23RSS (black triangle) downstream of the yeast actin promoter. The plasmids present in strains ACY159 and ACY160 are as shown, with ACY159 expressing core versions of RAG1 and RAG2 (RAG1c, RAG2c) and ACY160 expressing their full-length counterparts RAG1FL and RAG2FL. (B and C) Time course of expression of core RAG1/2 in strain ACY159 and full-length RAG1/2 in strain ACY160 following galactose induction. The position of the proteins as detected by immunoblot analysis with (B) anti-hemagglutinin antibody (RAG1) and (C) anti-RAG2 antibody is shown. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 489-499DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00305-8)

Figure 2 Nested PCR Detects Signal Joints and Intramolecular Transposition Products in Yeast (A) (Left) Signal ends can be fused to form a signal joint circle. (Middle) A RAG-mediated intramolecular transposition reaction in which the 3′ hydroxyl groups attack the strand opposite to the one from which they derive will create an inversion circle, with RSSs flanked by target site duplications. (Right) A RAG-mediated intramolecular transposition in which the 3′ hydroxyl groups attack the same strand from which they derive will create two deletion circles, only one of which is recoverable by nested PCR. Triangles indicate the location of RSSs and vertical lines the insertion sites (and position of target site duplications). The locations of nested PCR primers used to detect signal joints and transposition products are marked by straight arrows, and the distance between these primers and of the entire signal-end product is shown. Hairpinned coding ends and coding joints were not assayed for. (B) Nested PCR products of the size expected for signal joints and inversion circles (∼536 bp, 968–432 bp) and products of the size expected for deletion circles (<536 bp) are detectable only in yeast strain ACY159 induced to express the RAG proteins (lanes 17–24) and not in controls (lanes 3–16). Lane 1 is a 100 bp DNA ladder. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 489-499DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00305-8)

Figure 3 Frequency and Characterization of Intramolecular Transposition Products and Signal Joints (A) Recovery of intramolecular transposition products and signal joints. Transposition products are observed more frequently than signal joints in strains expressing the core RAG proteins (ACY142 and ACY159). Both transposition and signal joining products are detected in strains expressing the full-length RAG proteins (ACY160), although at a greatly reduced frequency. Transposition products are recovered but signal joints are not recovered in lif1Δ strains (ACY174 and ACY175). (B) Target site duplications observed in inversion circles recovered from strains expressing either core RAG1/2 (ACY142 and ACY159) or full-length RAG1/2 (ACY160). The duplications are 4 and 5 bp in length and are predominantly GC rich. “N” indicates the number of insertions observed into a single target site. * indicates that insertion into the target site was observed in multiple inductions. (C) Distribution of intramolecular transposition target sites along the length of the 968 bp signal-ended product observed in strains expressing core RAG1/2 (ACY159 and ACY142). The numbers above or flanking symbols indicate multiple events occurring at a single position. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 489-499DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00305-8)

Figure 4 Repair of Deletion but Not Inversion Circles (A) Schematic diagram of S1 sensitivity assay. Signal joints and intramolecular transposition products that have been repaired are insensitive to S1 nuclease and are amplifiable by nested PCR. Transposition products that are not repaired and remain single-stranded at the target site duplications are sensitive to treatment with S1 nuclease and then cannot be amplified by PCR. (B) Inversion circles are sensitive to treatment with S1 nuclease while deletion circles are not. The total number of PCR reactions conducted on DNA from strains “wild-type” (WT) for NHEJ activity (ACY142 and ACY159) and lif1Δ strains (ACY174 and ACY175) is shown. The presence (+) or absence (−) of S1 is indicated. SJs, signal joints; INV, inversion circles; DEL, deletion circles. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 489-499DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00305-8)