Journal of Vascular Surgery SS01. Prospective Nonrandomized Study to Evaluate Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Technical Assessment of Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair Emanuel R. Tenorio, Gustavo S. Oderich, Giuliano A. Sandri, Pinar Ozbek, Jussi M. Karkkainen, Terri J. Vrtiska, Thanila A. Macedo, Peter Gloviczki Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 67, Issue 6, (June 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.074 Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 A, Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) demonstrates compression of the superior mesenteric artery stent. B, Treatment by redo balloon angioplasty and flaring of the stent. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2018 67, DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.074) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Total effective dose (ED) using imaging protocol with fluoroscopy, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Note significant reduction in effective dose by elimination of DSA and postprocedure CTA. EVAR, Endovascular aneurysm repair; F-BEVAR, fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair; IBD, iliac branch device; TEVAR, thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2018 67, DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.074) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions