Date Submitted: [February 8, 2006]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February, 2006 Doc: IEEE a Qi, Zhen, Li, Hara and Kohno (NICT) SlideTG4a1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Advertisements

Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
Submission Title: [Beacon design of BAN superframe]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc g>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> April 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2014
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Preamble length and packet efficiency for TG4a]
doc.: IEEE g-Trends-in-SUN-capacity
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Proposed resolution for CID 180.
July Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [On unifying PPDU formats] Date Submitted:
1/14/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Moderate Rate Options for TG4a] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
Submission Title: [A new ranging packet structure]
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Response to optional CoU and CS pulses related.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> December 2015
Submission Title: [Comment Resolutions for #309, #310, and #314]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
Submission Title: [Uniform bandplan for TG4a Modulation]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> May 2015
March 2013 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Comment Resolution Suggestions Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Considerations on general MAC frame] Date Submitted:
Date Submitted: November 11, 2005]
Submission Title: [Preamble structures for 4a]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2016
May 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolutions for SC-PHY Modulation and Spreading.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DF6 Radio-burst length over PSDU size] Date.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution for FSK/GFSK Prior Comments]
doc.: IEEE <doc g>
Date Submitted: October 24, 2005]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> July 2015
Date Submitted: October 24, 2005]
Submission Title: [LB 28 Results] Date Submitted: [14 March 2005]
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Discussion and Conclusion of Conference Call on February19]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> September 2015
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Submission Title: [Low duty cycle UWB piconet]
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Still More LB156 Comment Resolutions Date.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Still More LB156 Comment Resolutions Date.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Slot Considerations in BAN] Date Submitted:
Presentation transcript:

Date Submitted: [February 8, 2006] Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested revisions for T/TR comments regarding CCA issues (Part 1)] Date Submitted: [February 8, 2006] Source: [Yihong Qi, Bin Zhen, Huan-Bang Li, Shinsuke Hara and Ryuji Kohno Company: National Institute of Information and Communications Technology ] Contact: Yihong Qi Voice:+81 46 847 5092, E-Mail: yhqi@nict.go.jp] Abstract: [Suggested revisions for T/TR comments regarding CCA with multiplexed preamble are presented.] Purpose: [Help to resolve the T/TR comments on CCA issues] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. TG4a

Suggested Revisions for T/TR Comments regarding CCA issues (Part 1) Yihong Qi, Bin Zhen, Huan-Bang Li, Shinsuke Hara and Ryuji Kohno National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) TG4a

Classification of the comments on CCA T/TR comments on clause 6.8a2.1: description of the multiplexed preamble (10, to be addressed in this presentation) clause 6.9.9: CCA modes (to be completed soon) E comments (3, all accepted) TG4a

Comment 423 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy The figure shows two blocks for the Frame Length, implying that the field is repeated twice (all 7 bits) Suggested remedy This should be the 4 lsbs of the Frame Length in the left most block the 3 msbs of the Frame Length field and the reserved bit in the next block over. TG4a

Suggested revision for C423 The comment is accepted. Fig. 27b is revised as Revised part TG4a

Comment 424 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy What is the "mandatory setting” on pp. 28, line 35 Suggested remedy Define the "mandatory setting" clearly, perhaps with an xref to where it is defined. TG4a

Suggested revision for C424 The comment is accepted. The sentence is revised as ``The modulation and the waveform of the inserted preamble symbols are defined in 6.8a.2 and 6.8a.3.” TG4a

Comment 425 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy pp. 28, line 35 The numPSDUBits is only defined for when the mandatory data rate is used. There is no information for what to use for the other data rates. Suggested remedy Define numPSDUBits for the other data rates. TG4a

Suggested revision for C425 The comment is accepted. The sentence ``the spreading code and PRF of inserted preamble…the numPSDUbits shall be 4.” is revised as ``The time interval between two adjacent inserted preamble symbols is fixed, and is equivalent to the duration of 4 mandatory symbol lengths. The mandatory symbol rate is 0.965MHz, as defined in 6.8a.3.1.” TG4a

Comment 426 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy Comment accepted pp. 28, line 41 You can't guarantee that the CCA detector will find the preamble symbols, it depends on the signal level, channel quality and interferers, if any.. Suggested remedy Change "shall find at least" to be "will have the opportunity to find at least“ Comment accepted TG4a

Comment 427 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy Comment accepted pp. 29, line 6 (first line of the second paragraph) I think you mean "command frame" not "MAC frame" Suggested remedy Change "MAC frame" to be "command frame“ Comment accepted TG4a

Comment 428 (TR) Comment Suggested remedy pp. 29, line 12 (the third paragraph) Otherwise, the PHY is supposed to look for the preamble symbols, not report the medium idle. It only reports idle if it doesn't find the preamble symbols. Suggested remedy Change the text to correctly describe the CCA process. TG4a

Suggested revision for C428 The comment is accepted. The sentences are revised as ``In the optional UWB CCA mode, the PHY shall listen to the medium during a period equivalent to the CCA detection window. If the preamble symbol is detected, the CCA shall report a busy medium. Otherwise, an idle medium shall be reported.” TG4a

Comment 490 (T) Comment Suggested remedy pp. 29, line 12 (the third paragraph) The second to last paragraph in this section says, "Otherwise, an idle medium shall be reported". This sounds appropriate for mandatory ALOHA mode, but not for any other CCA mode. Suggested remedy Clarify text. Comment accepted. Same comment as C428 TG4a

Comment 678 (T) Comment Suggested remedy pp. 28, line 28 (the third paragraph of 6.8a2.1) It is not clear to me how long the interleaved preamble segments should be. Figure 27b says "Preamble symbol" Does this mean one transmission one period of the preamble code? Later on in the text we have the following: "Wherever the CCA detection window starts, either from the regular preamble or from the data portion in a frame, the CCA detectors shall find at least 8 preamble symbols in the CCA detection window" How do we ensure this to be true. I'm thinking of small packets with very little payload? Suggested remedy Clarify the meaning of "Preamble Symbol" in terms of it length. TG4a

Suggested revision for C678 The comment is accepted. The sentences are revised as (incorporating modification of fig.27b) ``Figure 27b shows the frame structure which supports the optional UWB CCA mode. The PSDU field of the frame originates from the MAC layer (5.4.3). The PHY of a transmitter periodically inserts one preamble symbol after each data segment of a fixed length in PHR and PSDU fields. The inserted preamble symbol is same as the preamble symbol used in the preamble field of the same frame, as defined in 6.8a.2. The first inserted preamble symbol shall be located immediately after the SHR.” TG4a

Concluding Remarks The revised suggestions for the comments regarding description of the multiplexed preamble are presented. If the suggestions are acceptable, we are going to modify clause 6.8a.2.1 to incorporate those changes. The modified text will be sent to the web server soon. Revisions corresponding to the remaining comments are to be presented next time. TG4a