Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Improving EEA marine indicators: a review of their performance now and in the future Trine Christiansen Colleagues in ETC/Water Eva Royo Gelabert.

Advertisements

Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)

The newly adopted Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) and the work of the informal working group European Marine Monitoring and Assessment (EMMA)

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Goals and Challenges

Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status

Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.

1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER The EEA’s needs for data and information on transitional, coastal and marine waters - proposed indicators.

Main elements of an Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme: Biodiversity Integrated Correspondence Group on Monitoring 30 March-1 April (Athens,

Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland

MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.

INSPIRE Developing the “Marine Pilot” project: Directorate-General Environment Governance, Information & Reporting Unit EC/EEA.

1 EEA 2007 Belgrade Report: Marine/coastal Chapter WG on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Geneva, November 27 – 29 Eva Royo Gelabert EEA, Project.

Rodney Forster Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft, UK Products from the EMECO North Sea Observatory: an EU policy.

Recommendations Entry point into discussion should be the indicator(s) as biodiversity so varied Specification of the indicator is key (due to variety)

REFERENCE VALUES experiences from the TMAP and QSR 2004.

Fishing and Habitat Integrity Leonie Dransfeld D3+ workshop April 2014.

Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.

Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.

Alignment and Integration to MSFD

‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’

Guidance report: Methodology for the assessment of ecological coherence of MPA’s Henk Wolters 30 October 2014.

Coherent geographic scales and aggregation rules in assessment and monitoring of Good Environmental Status Theo Prins, Myra van der Meulen, Arjen Boon.

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD

Adjusting the CIS structure - Presentation to MSCG meeting 14 November

Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments

EEA–EMMA Workshop November 2006

Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture

WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE

Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD

Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics

Synthesis of EEA-led EMMA workshops on:

Ana Cristina Cardoso & Mark Dowell

EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen

Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –

Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator

One-out-all-out and other indicators

Alan Fisher OSPAR Pilot project on Ecological Quality Objectives ( ) for the North Sea.

19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018

Conclusions: Parallel session 2, Group 2

European Commission DG Environment

WFD “case study” Gert Verreet – DG Environment, Unit D.2 marine team

Update on work of EMMA “European marine monitoring and assessment”

Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

WS1: Overall remarks plenary

15th meeting of MSCG, 9 February 2015, Brussels

Monitoring and assessment of the marine environment under the European Marine Strategy Introduction The European Union is highly dependent on maritime.

Trine Christiansen Constanca Belchior

EEA support to the wider marine assessments in the MSFD: European & regional marine indicator convergence Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine Assessments.

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments

Partcipants - presentations

Wrap up of agenda item no. 3

Marine Reporting Units: Western Mediterranean Sea

Questionnaire on Elaboration of the MSFD Initial Assessment

Marine Reporting Units: Aegean-Levantine Sea

Marine Reporting Units: Ionian Sea & Central Mediterranean Sea

Group 2 OSPAR/ICES Chaired by Mr Gert Verreet

OSPAR progress on use of the decentralised option for reporting on monitoring programmes required under Article 11 of the MSFD.

EU Water Framework Directive

WG GES Drafting Group June 2013 Berlin

WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate

ICES requested to give guidance on integration

Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels

Partcipants - presentations

Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting

Presentation transcript:

Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments Breakout session EEA-led EMMA workshop on “Ecological processes/biological elements” Day 2: 21 November 2006 Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments

Background documents Many documents provided for workshop Most of them are for reference and further reading Main working documents for Day 2 are: “Indicator” package: EMMA WS2/3, 4 & 5 “Monitoring” package: EMMA WS2/6

Groups Group 1 “HELCOM/UNEP-MAP”  To Fontana room(4th floor) Group 2 “OSPAR/ICES”  Stay here! See lists provided for Group “affiliation”

Themes/Quality elements (1/2) Group 1 HELCOM/UNEP-MAP Tables EEA-led EMMAWS2/4 Some overlaps (faster discussion) Biology B5, B6 and B7 (habitats) C8, C9 and C14 (species) Chlorophyll Ecology D1 (eutrophication) Nutrients/ Pressures & impacts I1, I2, I3, I4 and I5 (physico-chemical/organic) Nutrients

Themes/Quality elements (2/2) Group 2 OSPAR/ICES Tables EEA-led EMMAWS2/4 Some overlaps (faster discussion) Biology B5, B6 and B7 (habitats) C10, C11, C12 and C13 (species) Fish and invasive aliens Ecology D1 (eutrophication) Nutrients Pressures & impacts E1, E2, F1, F2, F3, G1 and G2 (physical) I1 (physico-chemical/organic) J1, J2 and J3 (biological)

Process (1/2) “Gap possibilities” need to be verified: “Indicator” document EEA-led EMMAWS2/4  Table by table as allocated to Group “Gap analysis” (in existing regional indicators vis-a-vis what should be assessed under the MSD “initial assessment”) Verification of the indicators/datas sets included on the table “Gap possibilities” need to be verified: Looking at the “Monitoring” table EEA-led EMMAWS2/6 Asking participants (elements may not be assessed at the regional level, but national monitoring may exist)

Process (2/2) When we have an actual entry on the table (not a gap), we need to check: Coverage” (how many seas?) What is it?: Established indicator, indicator under development, or dataset (or project)  Implications for further development Recommendations to EMMA & EEA on “next steps” (e.g. detailed comparison) Limitations!! (e.g. consistency, incomplete monitoring table), but we are starting the process