On-going Evaluation in Germany

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry of Economy and Finance SPAIN María Muñoz General Directorate for Community Funds Ministry.
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
Pilot exercise on result indicators Operational Programme "Entrepreneurship and Innovation" DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting Brussels, 22 June 2012.
Regional Policy Revised version Marielle Riché Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Brussels.
NBFSE Financial instruments and mechanisms of fund allocation to social economy Common meeting 5-6 th December, Milano.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Pierre GODIN, Policy Analyst
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI)
Core Indicators in the Finnish ERDF programming documents DG REGIO EVALUATION NETWORK MEETING Brussels, 26 June 2008 Harri Ahlgren Ministry of.
Preparation for the next programming period DG AGRI, November 2005 EU rural development policy.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
EQUAL Community Initiative Programme for Malta Conference co-financed by the EU: European Social Fund (ESF) Co-financing Rate: 75% EU Funds;
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
Implementing the NATIONAL EVALUATION STRATEGY Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project on Programming, Monitoring and Evaluation MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE.
1 Place of Rural Development in Regional Policies Wladyslaw Piskorz, Head of Unit Urban development and territorial cohesion, European Commission, Directorate.
1 Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority The Ministry for Regional Development 7. May 2010, Budapest.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Core Indicators during Latvia Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European Union Funds Strategy Department, Ministry of Finance DG.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
1 Cohesion Policy Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Cohesion policy programmes co-financed.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Open Days 2015 “Interreg Europe: how can Investment for Growth and Jobs programmes benefit? October 15 th, 2015 / Brussels Managing Authority testimony:
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity in programming period
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Evaluation : goals and principles
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Ex post evaluation of ERDF and Cohesion Fund
DEVELOPMENT & IMPLEMENTATION OF A NATIONAL STRATEGY ON CSR
CZ Evaluation - state of play
Cohesion Policy and Cities
1. Current phase ERDF evaluation working group established 14th August 2008 Chaired by MEE (MA) Members: other ministries, regions (regional councils and.
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
THEMATIC NETWORKS and WORKING GROUPS
Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.
How a local authority can improve policies for circular economy
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Purpose of the presentation
An overview The EU Strategy for the Danube Region -
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” Mid-term evaluation of Operational Programme “Regional.
Preparation of Member States’ Strategic Reports 2009 European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities Brussels, 9 June 2009 John.
From ‘Lisbon’ to Europe 2020: a new design of the reporting cycle and how to link it to the ESF ESF Evaluation Partnership Working Group on the ESF contribution.
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
EU Funds Audit – Recent developments in Structural Funds
Evaluation of ESF support to Gender Equality
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

On-going Evaluation in Germany 2007- 2013 DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 2-3 April 2009 Ulrike Schreckenberger Federal Ministry of Economy and Technology, Unit EA3 – Coordination of European Structural Policy, ERDF 10115 Berlin, Germany

Introduction In Germany 18 ERDF OPs 2007-2013 17 regional OPs (6 in Convergence objective and 11 in objective for Regional Competitiveness and Employment) 1 sectoral OP (Federal OP Transport, in convergence regions only)

Starting Position of EU Structural Policy in Germany Specifics of German regions with different structural problems Resulting in different regional Operational Programmes (different in volume and content) Decentral management of EU Structural Policy due to federalist state system in Germany Coordination of general questions by the national level, with ERDF issues by Federal Ministry of Economy, Unit EA3

On-going Evaluation 2007-2013 Different OPs -> different evaluation approaches New evaluation principles regarded as progress due to greater flexibility So far 7 evaluation plans or concepts, at least 4 more to come yet more 3 MAs plan mid-term evaluations until 2011 either of the entire OP or thematic evaluations Generally close alliance between continuous monitoring of OPs and deepening evaluation of the entire OP or parts of it

Details of Evaluations Either conceived as Mid-term evaluations according to the period 2000-2006 (possible risk: need of premature OP revision because of the economic crisis) Or as thematic evaluations of specific priority axes, e.g. competitiveness of enterprises, specific horizontal themes, e.g. equal opportunities, sustainable urban development, or specific methods,e.g. competitiveness In general external experts are charged with the evaluations and a steering comittee is established

Examples for on-going evaluation North-Rhine Westfalia: „Competition“ completed Thematic evaluations „micro loans“ and specific competitions, e.g. Start ups Niedersachsen: „impact of selection criteria“ and implementation of „regional budgets“(= independant management of funding by municipalities“) Sachsen: Equal opportunities (finished by April 2009) OP priority axis „Competitiveness of entrepreneurship“ Sachsen-Anhalt: Evaluation plan was presented here in June 2008, now running on schedule

Example on-going Evaluation in Thuringia ERDF evaluation concept from November 2008 Setting up of a working group Evaluation Identification of annual target figures for output and result indicators (intermediate bodies were consulted) In annual report 2008 analysis of the target figures for the first time Divergency with more than 20% -> evaluation is started (divergency between 10 and 20% evaluation is optional) Internal or external Evaluations according to complexity and volume

Example on-going Evaluation Thuringia Moreover optional evaluations (resulting from qualitative analysis of OP priorities in the annual reports) Irrespective from these evaluations there will be a Mid-term evaluation at the end of 2011 latest (including evaluation of equal opportunities) Most important elements of the Mid-term evaluation: impact analysis of ERDF promotion, quantification of the impact indicators, strategic evaluation Regular Monitoring of the development of environment (evaluation resulting from negative development of environment indicators in the annual report)

Mid-term Evaluation Thuringia Main focus is Impact analysis and Impact indicators In the OP output and result indicators are defined and quantified, whereas impact indicators are just defined. The Mid-term evaluation shall help with the quantification. E.g.: - increase of patent application, - increase of business volume (turnover) in the field of R&D