Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Community engagement Implementing NICE guidance 2008 NICE public health guidance 9.

Advertisements

1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.

W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.

Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 5C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.

Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013.

PI Manual Update EUM – March questions to:

Final Report. Dev/Prototype Fall 2011 System Testing (Early) Spring 2012 Pilot Test w/ Selected Departments Spring 2012 Trainings for Academic Chairs.

Site-Based Decision Making: A Basic Overview Texas Education Agency – Resource Guide.

Dougherty Elementary School ELAC October 22,2014.

District XXXX Presidents-elect Training Seminar 1 Session 2: Working with Your Club and District Leaders.

CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.

Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.

DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Technology Domain Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.

Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.

What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.

Concerns, Data, Next Steps.  New Administration Software from Scantron  New Academic Senate Policy  New Items/Survey Form (ACE, Iowa Item Pool)  New.

Managing Adults Module 24.

IFTA COMMISSIONER TRAINING COMMITTEE UPDATE July 2012 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.

Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.

Derek Schmitz Finance Chair Class of 2016 FINANCE PROCESS.

Teaching Evaluations at Missouri S&T Yinfa Ma, Chair Faculty Senate CET Presentation for FS meeting on November 18, 2010.

Parent Council engagement: September 2015

SPANISH Results Schools comparison. SPANISH Results Schools comparison.

Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results

Dr. Annebelle Nery Vice President of Student Success

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Strategic plan process from Fall Spring 2017

New Department Chair Workshop

CLUB SERVICE PROJECTS By: PP Ronnie Tan RC of Belait PETS – 2009/10.

“Working with Your Club and District Leaders”

Institutional Program Review 2017 Update

University Resource Alignment: Goals and Process

Annual Student Feedback Survey 2018 response rate 33 %

Administrative Review Process

School Climate Survey 2008.

1=Strongly Disagree 2=Agree 3=Neutral 4=Agree 5= Strongly Agree

Senate Meeting Summary

King Philip Community Working Groups (CWG)

Campus Improvement Plans

Campus Needs Assessment

Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)

Does the board perform all of its duties?

Recommendation to the Board of Directors: New District Assessments

Regulatory Responses (n=11) Company Responses (n=20)

Planning and Building Committee

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Instructional Calendar Development

Senior Faculty Transitions Task Force: Part II

Student Survey Results

Curriculum & Instruction

Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response

Overview and Findings from Summer /17/10

Welcome Back to the District Assessment Selection Committee (DASC)!

2008 Space Grant Regional Meetings Survey Results

Their role within Schools and Colleges

Undergraduate Survey Data

Faculty Senate President’s Report

Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:

Accreditation follow-up report

Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction

The Many Roles of the Chief Instructional Officer

Review of Protocols for ACI Reports

2nd Progress Meeting, Progress Meeting Evaluation, Holon Institute of Technology, Holon, Israel, April 2018.

Student Growth Measures

Wildland Fire Policy Revision

Accreditation: Working towards the self-study

Progress Meeting Evaluation of BIU October 2017, Ramat Gan, Israel

The Role of the Academic Senate President and Effective Leadership

Survey Results from 12 Committees

Functional Area Assessment Liaisons Meeting

Presentation transcript:

Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes August 2016

Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes Every spring, each member of a governance group completes a survey about their respective group’s work for the year. Planning and Research consolidates the results into individual committee reports and each committee chair reviews the results with their committee. The results are shared with the Co-Chairs of the District Governance Senate who incorporate the results into the year-end evaluation report.

Consolidated Survey Results The senate/committee met its role and responsibility. 48 responses, 67% Strongly Agree, 33% Agree Adequate resources were available to support this group. 49 responses, 51% Strongly Agree, 47% Agree, 2% Disagree The workload of this senate/committee was appropriate. 49 responses, 41% Strongly Agree, 57% Agree, 2% Disagree The senate/committee was effective in meeting its initiatives. 49 responses, 59% Strongly Agree, 41% Agree

Annual Assessment of Decision-making Processes This info is reviewed by each senate/committee at the end of the year and again at the beginning of the new year as initiatives are being set. In addition, respondents were given opportunity to provide comments and/or make recommendations for improvement. Based on information obtained through this process, the COS 2.0 Manuals were revised this summer and will go through the governance process early this fall.

Questions?