Coordinated Regulation of Accessory Genetic Elements Produces Cyclic Di-Nucleotides for V. cholerae Virulence  Bryan W. Davies, Ryan W. Bogard, Travis S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Advertisements

Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (April 2009)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 149, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Targeted mRNA Degradation by Deadenylation-Independent Decapping
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Dragony Fu, Kathleen Collins  Molecular Cell 
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
An RNA Sensor for Intracellular Mg2+
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Slicing-Independent RISC Activation Requires the Argonaute PAZ Domain
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e7 (March 2018)
Jason N. Kuehner, David A. Brow  Molecular Cell 
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
A Proteinaceous Gene Regulatory Thermometer in Salmonella
Tetsushi Iida, Rika Kawaguchi, Jun-ichi Nakayama  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 147, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
RNase III-Mediated Silencing of a Glucose-Dependent Repressor in Yeast
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Dicer-like Enzymes with Sequence Cleavage Preferences
Multiple RNA Surveillance Pathways Limit Aberrant Expression of Iron Uptake mRNAs and Prevent Iron Toxicity in S. cerevisiae  Albert Lee, Anthony K. Henras,
Adelina A. Davies, Andrea Neiss, Helle D. Ulrich  Cell 
Nucleoid Proteins Stimulate Stringently Controlled Bacterial Promoters
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Coordinated Regulation of Accessory Genetic Elements Produces Cyclic Di-Nucleotides for V. cholerae Virulence  Bryan W. Davies, Ryan W. Bogard, Travis S. Young, John J. Mekalanos  Cell  Volume 149, Issue 2, Pages 358-370 (April 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The ToxT Regulon (A) Schematic outlining ToxT regulon. Major regulatory targets grouped by functional class are shown. Solid arrows denote direct ToxT regulation identified by integrated ChIP-seq and RNA-seq analysis. Dashed arrows denote indirect ToxT regulation identified by RNA-seq alone. Green indicates positive gene expression; red indicates negative gene expression. Specific pathways are indicated beside their functional group and colored to indicate the direction of their regulation. (B) Schematic of the 6th ToxT ChIP peak site in the Tcp island between VC0845 and VC0846. The heat map shows enrichment (red) of sequenced reads at ToxT ChIP peak. Below, alignment of RNA-seq reads shows the predicted sRNA outlined by the black box. RNA-seq reads colored red align to the reverse strand of the genome, whereas reads colored green align to the forward strand. The predicted sequence of the sRNA is shown at the top in uppercase font from 5′ to 3′. The nucleotides in bold highlight a rho-independent hairpin terminator predicted by the ARNold program server. (C) ToxT ChIP enrichment of the promoter regions of ctxA, tcpA, and 6th ToxT ChIP peak was determined by qPCR relative to sample DNA input. Enrichment of a non-ToxT-dependent promoter of VC1141 is shown as a control. Significance was determined by t test relative to the VC1141 promoter: ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Mean with standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown. (D) Northern blot of RNA from indicated strains probed for the presence of the sRNA (TarB) as predicted by RNA-seq alignment (top panel). The size markers of a ssRNA ladder are indicated. The same samples were probed for 5S rRNA as a loading control (bottom panel). (E) qPCR analysis of the effect of TarB on VC0177 (VspR) expression levels in V. cholerae WT strains C6706 and E7946 following expression of ToxT from a plasmid. Expression for each sample was determined relative to 16S rRNA, and at least three independent replicates were tested. Fold changes are normalized relative to expression in the WT strain. Significance was determined by t test relative to the WT strain: ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Mean with SEM is shown. See also Table S1. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 VSP-1 Integration in Virulence (A) Expression analysis of VSP-1 genes in WT and VC0177::Tn C6706 strains. The expression of each gene was determined relative to total 16S rRNA. Eight replicates were sampled for each gene. Significance was determined by t test: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Mean with SEM is shown. (B) VC0177 (VspR) ChIP enrichment of the 5′ UTRs of VC0176, VC0178, VC0179, and VC0180 was determined by qPCR relative to sample DNA input. Enrichment of the promoter region of non-VSP-1 gene VC1141 is shown as a control. Significance was determined by t test relative to control enrichment: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Mean with SEM is shown. (C) In vivo competition experiments measuring the ability of mutant strains to colonize the infant mouse intestine compared to the parental strain. Significance was determined by t test relative to colonization ratio of parental strains WT C6706 versus C6706 ΔlacZ: ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S1. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Di-Nucleotide Cyclase Activity of VC0179 (A) Purified WT or mutated VC0179 was incubated with 1 mM ATP and 10 μCi α-P32 ATP for the indicated time (t in min), and the products (P1) were separated by denaturing PAGE. (B) The product from the reaction between VC0179 and ATP (P1) was incubated with CIP or snake venom phosphodiesterase (SVPD) for 30 min and separated by denaturing PAGE. (C) Purified WT VC0179 was incubated with 1 mM GTP and 10 μCi α-P32 GTP for the indicated time (t in min), and the products (P2) were separated by denaturing PAGE. (D) VC0179 was incubated with ATP or GTP as described above or with 1 mM GTP and 10 μCi α-P32 ATP, and the products (P1–P3) were separated by denaturing PAGE. P1, c-di-AMP; P2, c-di-GMP; P3, c-AMP-GMP. (E) Purified WT VC0179 was incubated with 1 mM GTP and 10 μCi α-P32 ATP for the indicated time (t in min), and the products (P3) were separated by denaturing PAGE. (F–J) Commercial standards of ATP, GTP, c-di-AMP, and c-di-GMP were fractionated by RP-HPLC. The peaks are labeled by their respective compound. VC0179 incubated with 2 mM ATP (G), 2 mM GTP (H), 1 mM ATP plus 1 mM GTP (I), or 1 mM of each of the five NTPs (J) for 30 min at 37°C was fractionated by RP-HPLC. A total of 50 nM of VC0179 (DncV) WT or mutant enzyme was used per reaction. See also Figures S2, S3, S4, and S5 and Tables S2 and S3. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DncV In Vivo Biochemical and Regulator Activity (A) LCMS chromatogram trace corresponding to the ion extraction of c-AMP-GMP (theoretical mass [M − H−] = 673.0927 Da; ion extraction: 673.0922–673.0947 m/z) in cell lysate from V. cholerae ΔdncV strain expressing plasmid-borne WT or D131A/D133A mutant DncV. High-resolution mass found under the peak eluting at approximately 4.75 min in chromatogram A corresponding to c-AMP-GMP from V. cholerae ΔdncV strain expressing WT DncV is shown in the inset. This peak eluted with the same retention time as in vitro-generated c-AMP-GMP. (B) Functional categories of differentially expressed genes in response to expression of DncV. The number of genes induced or repressed in response to DncV expression is presented. Green indicates that genes in the respective category are induced >2-fold; red indicates that genes in respective category are repressed >2-fold (FDR corrected p value <0.01). (C) Examination of chemotactic behavior of V. cholerae WT, ΔdncV mutant, and ΔdncV mutant expressing WT or D131A/D131A mutant DncV from an arabinose-inducible plasmid, with and without induction by arabinose. See also Figures S6 and S7, Table S4, and Movies S1 and S2. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Model for ToxT-Dependent TarB-Mediated Control of VSP-1 (1) Host signals induce ToxT activity resulting in transcription of TarB from the Tcp Island. (2) Stabilized by Hfq, TarB downregulates expression of transcriptional repressor VC0177 (VspR), resulting in derepression of VSP-1 genes including VC0179 (DncV). (3) DncV activity increases cellular concentration of c-AMP-GMP (and possibly c-di-AMP and c-di-GMP) that affects (4) chemotactic behavior and other metabolic aspects of 7th pandemic V. cholerae. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Analysis of TarB-VspR Pathway, Related to Figure 2 (A) Expression analysis of VSP-1 genes VC0176, VC0178, VC0179, and VC0180 in WT and two clones carrying in frame deletions of VC0177. The expression of each gene was determined relative to total 16S rRNA. 4 replicates were sampled for each gene. Significance was determined by t test; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (B and C) Computational prediction using RNAhybrid of the interactions between TarB and the 5′ UTRs of (B) VspR and (C) TcpF. TarB is shown in green. The arrows indicate the ATG start codon of VspR and TcpF mRNA. Free energy of hybridization is shown. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Sequence Alignment of VC0179 and Human Oligo Adenylate Synthetase Based on HHPRED Analysis, Related to Figure 3 Catalytic residues of oligo adenylate synthetase (OAS) aligning with identical residues in VC0179 are shown in black boxes. The nucleotidyl transferase superfamily consensus sequence in underlined in gray (G[G/S]x9-13Dx[D/E]). Red asterisks mark the residues in VC0179 mutated to alanine (D131A and D133A). Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Cyclic Di-Nucleotide Analysis by LCMS, Related to Figure 3 LCMS analysis of (A) c-di-GMP, (B) VC0179 + GTP reaction product, (C) c-di-AMP, (D) VC0179 + ATP reaction product, and (E) VC0179 + ATP +GTP reaction product. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Cyclic Di-Nucleotide Analysis by MS/MS, Related to Figure 3 (A) Molecular structures, exact masses, and MS/MS fragmentation pattern of c-di-AMP, c-di-GMP, and c-AMP-GMP. MS/MS analysis of (B) c-di-GMP, (C) VC0179 + GTP reaction product, (D) c-di-AMP, (E) VC0179 + ATP reaction product, and (F) VC0179 + ATP + GTP reaction product. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Enzymatic Activity and Phylogenetic Tree of VC0179, Related to Figure 3 (A) Purified wild-type or mutated VC0179 (50 nM) was incubated with 1 mM ATP and 10 μCi α-P32 ATP (ATP), with 1 mM GTP and 10 μCi α-P32 GTP (GTP) or 1 mM GTP and 10 μCi α-P32 ATP (ATP/GTP) for 60 min and the products (P1–P3) separated by denaturing PAGE. P1, c-di-AMP; P2, c-di-GMP; P3, c-AMP-GMP. (B) Tree guide of ClustalW alignment of homologs that are at least 20% similar to DncV and have the conserved G[G/S]x9-13Dx[D/E] motif. The position of 7th pandemic V. cholerae El Tor strains is indicated with by the asterisk. Matrix, BLOSUM; Open gap penalty, 10; Extending gap penalty, 0.05; End gap penalty, 10; Separation gap penalty, 0.05. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S6 In Vivo Analysis of DncV and Its Reaction Products, Related to Figure 4 (A) LCMS chromatogram trace corresponding to the ion extraction of c-AMP-GMP (theoretical mass [M-H] = 673.0927 Da; ion extraction: 673.0922–673.0947 Da) in cell lysate from E. coli expressing plasmid borne WT or D131A/D133A mutant DncV. (B) High resolution mass found under the peak eluting at approximately 4.75 min in chromatogram A corresponding to c-AMP-GMP from E. coli expressing WT DncV. This peak eluted with the same retention time as in vitro generated c-AMP-GMP. (C) LCMS chromatogram trace corresponding to the ion extraction of c-di-AMP (theoretical mass [M-H] = 657.0978 Da; ion extraction: 657.0912–657.1044 Da) in cell lysate from E. coli expressing plasmid borne WT or D131A/D133A mutant DncV. (D) High-resolution mass found under the peak eluting at approximately 3.60 min in chromatogram A corresponding to c-di-AMP from E. coli expressing WT DncV. This peak eluted with the same retention time as in vitro generated c-di-AMP. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S7 Total Ion Count Control for In Vivo LCMS Analysis, Related to Figure 4 Equal amounts of sample were analyzed for paired E. coli and V. cholerae experiments. (A) LCMS chromatogram trace showing total ion counts analyzed in cell lysate from E. coli expressing plasmid borne WT or D131A/D133A mutant DncV are approximately equal. (B) LCMS chromatogram trace showing total ion counts analyzed in cell lysate from V. cholerae ΔdncV strain expressing plasmid borne WT or D131A/D133A mutant DncV are approximately equal. (C) Determination of WT and D131A/D133A mutant DncV protein levels expressed in a V. cholerae ΔdncV mutant. Identical strains used for chemotaxis assay (Figure 4C) were used except DncV proteins carried a C-terminal 3XV5 epitope tag to monitor protein levels. Addition of the C-terminal epitope tag did not alter the effect of DncV expression on chemotaxis (data not shown). DncV expression was induced with arabinose for 90 min to allow for accumulation of DncV and potential degradation products. Equal amounts of culture were processed for Western blot analysis using α-V5 antibody to detect DncV and α-RpoB to detect RpoB as a sample loading control. A sample processed from the ΔdncV mutant strain expressing untagged WT DncV is shown to demonstrate the specificity of the V5 antibody. DncV and RpoB were identified by their size relative to a standard protein ladder. Cell 2012 149, 358-370DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions