Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Sensorimotor Role for Traveling Waves in Primate Visual Cortex
Advertisements

Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Differential Dynamics of Activity Changes in Dorsolateral and Dorsomedial Striatal Loops during Learning  Catherine A. Thorn, Hisham Atallah, Mark Howe,
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Chenguang Zheng, Kevin Wood Bieri, Yi-Tse Hsiao, Laura Lee Colgin 
Coding of the Reach Vector in Parietal Area 5d
Ian M. Finn, Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Cristopher M. Niell, Michael P. Stryker  Neuron 
Aaron C. Koralek, Rui M. Costa, Jose M. Carmena  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Attention-Induced Variance and Noise Correlation Reduction in Macaque V1 Is Mediated by NMDA Receptors  Jose L. Herrero, Marc A. Gieselmann, Mehdi Sanayei,
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Developmental Inhibition of Gsk3 Rescues Behavioral and Neurophysiological Deficits in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia Predisposition  Makoto Tamura, Jun.
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Inducing Gamma Oscillations and Precise Spike Synchrony by Operant Conditioning via Brain-Machine Interface  Ben Engelhard, Nofar Ozeri, Zvi Israel, Hagai.
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Hongbo Yu, Brandon J. Farley, Dezhe Z. Jin, Mriganka Sur  Neuron 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System
Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Adaptation Disrupts Motion Integration in the Primate Dorsal Stream
Huihui Zhou, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages e8 (February 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Katherine M. Armstrong, Jamie K. Fitzgerald, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Kevin Wood Bieri, Katelyn N. Bobbitt, Laura Lee Colgin  Neuron 
REM Sleep Reorganizes Hippocampal Excitability
Eye Movement Preparation Modulates Neuronal Responses in Area V4 When Dissociated from Attentional Demands  Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Georgia G. Gregoriou, Stephen J. Gotts, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Guilhem Ibos, David J. Freedman  Neuron 
Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking  C. Daniel Meliza, Yang Dan  Neuron  Volume.
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Marlene R. Cohen, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
Local Origin of Field Potentials in Visual Cortex
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Bálint Lasztóczi, Thomas Klausberger  Neuron 
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Tuned Normalization Explains the Size of Attention Modulations
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
The Postsaccadic Unreliability of Gain Fields Renders It Unlikely that the Motor System Can Use Them to Calculate Target Position in Space  Benjamin Y.
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (November 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex Xiaoxuan Jia, Seiji Tanabe, Adam Kohn  Neuron  Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 762-774 (February 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Effects of Stimulus Size on LFP Gamma Power and SFC (A) LFP spectra for responses to gratings ranging from 1 to 10 degrees in diameter. Only higher-frequency components are illustrated for clarity of display. Shading indicates SEM. (B) Average SFC for gratings of different sizes. Dashed lines indicate the coherence calculated after shuffling the trials. Shading indicates SEM. (C) SFC as a function of interelectrode distance for 1 and 10 deg gratings (n = 10,212 pairings). Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Gamma Phase Modulation of Spiking Activity (A) Illustration of the method. (B) Spike count distribution within the gamma cycle for an example site. The histogram is normalized to unit area. The preferred phase is indicated with a black triangle. Activity was driven by 10 degree gratings. (C) Distributions of preferred phase of individual sites from an example array, for activity driven by small (1 deg; gray) and large (10 deg; red) gratings. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 V1 Neuronal Synchrony (A) Average shuffle-corrected CCGs for large (red) and small (black) gratings. Shading, similar in size to the line thickness, indicates SEM. (B) Power spectra of the CCGs in (A). (C) Average jitter-corrected CCGs for large and small gratings. Shading indicates SEM. (D) Average jitter-corrected CCG peak amplitude, as a function of distance between recording sites. Error bars indicate SEM. (E) Rate of occurrence of different multineuron spiking events (n = 990,000 epochs of 1 ms duration). (F) Ratio between the rates shown in (E). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals based on bootstrapping. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relating Spiking Activity in V1 and V2 (A) Illustration of the experimental approach. (B) Centers of the spatial receptive fields (RFs) in V1 (red) and V2 (blue). Each dot indicates the RF center at a single site. The large circles indicate the extent of an exemplar V1 and V2 RF. (C) Example of shuffle-corrected V1-V2 CCG from one pair for large gratings. (D) Jitter-corrected CCGs (jitter window = 25 ms) for the pair in (C). (E and F) Average shuffle-corrected (left) and jitter-corrected (right) V1-V2 CCGs as a function of RF separation (distance between centers) for small (E; <3.5 deg) and large (F; 10 deg) gratings. (G) For shuffle-corrected (left) and jitter-corrected (right) V1-V2 CCGs, the difference between CCGs of responses to large and small gratings. Color bars indicate CCG values in coin/spk. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Coherence between V1 and V2 LFPs (A) Coherence as a function of frequency and V1-V2 RF separation for responses to small (top) and large (bottom) gratings. There were too few recording sites separated by 1.5–2.8 degrees to measure spiking correlation (Figure 4) accurately, but these limited data provided consistent measurements of field-field coherence and are shown here. (B) Average coherence as a function of frequency, for sites for which RFs were separated by less than 1 degree. Shading indicates SEM. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Phase Difference in the Gamma Band within and between Cortical Regions (A) Phase difference between V1 and V2 gamma rhythms for sites with RFs separated by less than 1 degree. (B) Phase difference in the gamma band between pairs of V1 sites, for the same V1 sites as in (A). (C) Phase difference in the gamma band between pairs of V2 sites, for the same V2 sites as in (A). Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Coupling of V1 and V2 Spiking Activity, Relative to the V1 and V2 Gamma Rhythms (A) The preferred gamma phase (ϕ) was defined as the phase at which local V1/V2 spiking activity was most likely. (B) V1 spike counts relative to the V1 gamma cycle, with the preferred phase plotted as the last bin. (C) Proportion of V1 spikes followed by a V2 spike 1–3 ms later, for each V1 gamma phase. (D) Normalized V2 spike counts relative to the V2 gamma cycle (solid line: all n = 186 cells; dashed line: 38 neurons with phase bias > 0.4). (E) Normalized V1 spike counts aligned with respect to the V2 gamma phase at which V2 firing is most likely (solid line: all n = 770 cells; dashed line: 306 neurons recorded simultaneously with the V2 neurons with a phase bias >0.4). (F) Proportion of V1 spikes that are followed by a V2 spike, with respect to the V2 gamma phase (solid line: all n = 17,518 pairs; dashed line: n = 2,117 pairings with V2 neurons with a bias >0.4). Error bars indicate SEM. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Dependence of LFP Gamma Power and Neuronal Coordination on Stimulus Orientation (A) Population orientation tuning of gamma power from one example array, for activity induced with large gratings. The red dot indicates the orientation that induced the most power; the gray dot indicates the worst orientation. (B) Coherence and phase difference between LFPs in V1, as a function of interelectrode distance and frequency (n = 2,961 pairs). (C) Averaged jitter-corrected V1-V1 CCGs for the best and worst stimulus orientations. The data shown are those of Figure 3, but not restricted to sites driven by small gratings. (D) Averaged jitter-corrected V1-V2 CCGs for the best and worst stimulus orientations. Error bars (A) and shading (C and D) indicate SEM. Neuron 2013 77, 762-774DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions