Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biology of Amyloid: Structure, Function, and Regulation
Advertisements

Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
The Structure of the Human Adenovirus 2 Penton
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
The Structure of the Human Adenovirus 2 Penton
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 164, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the RuvA-RuvB Complex
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 543-551 (November 2002) Chaperone Priming of Pilus Subunits Facilitates a Topological Transition that Drives Fiber Formation  Frederic G. Sauer, Jerome S. Pinkner, Gabriel Waksman, Scott J. Hultgren  Cell  Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 543-551 (November 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4

Figure 1 In Vitro Donor Strand Exchange and Chaperone Priming of Subunits (A) Alignment of the N-terminal extensions, beginning with residue 1 in each case, of Pap subunits with the G1 strand of PapD. Numbering is for PapK and PapD. The conserved alternating hydrophobic residues are indicated in red; the positions (Pn, where n = 1 to 5) that they occupy in the PapENtd groove (see text) are in blue. (B) Three Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gels of purified proteins are shown. Lanes 1 and 2 contain PapDHisPapE incubated in 2% SDS at 95° and 25°C, respectively, before loading. The ladder of PapE multimers (E2, E3, etc.) is visible in lane 2. Lanes 3 and 4 contain PapDHisPapENtd incubated in 2% SDS at 95° and 25°C, respectively, before loading. There is no ladder visible in lane 4. Lanes 5 and 6 contain a mixture of PapDHisPapENtd and an ∼15-fold molar excess of the KNte peptide incubated in 2% SDS at 95° and 25°C, respectively, before loading. Note the additional band above PapDHis that is the PapENtdKNte complex. Lanes 7 and 8 contain purified PapENtdKNte obtained by subjecting the sample from lanes 5 and 6 to nickel chromatography and collecting the flowthrough. Lanes 7 and 8 contain this flowthrough sample incubated in 2% SDS at 95° and 25°C, respectively, before loading. (C) Coomassie-stained gel. Lane 1 contains a mixture of PapDHisPapK and PapDHisPapENtd, lane 2 contains a mixture of PapDHisPapK and PapENtdKNte, and lane 3 contains PapENtdKNte. All samples were incubated in 2% SDS at 25°C before loading. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)

Figure 2 PapDHisPapENtd and PapENtdKNte Crystal Structures (A) Electron density of the PapDHisPapENtd complex from a map calculated using density-modified experimental MAD phases to 2.6 Å resolution. Carbons, nitrogens, and oxygens of the model are indicated in yellow, blue, and red, respectively. Strands are labeled. (B) Stereo ribbon diagram of the PapDHisPapENtd complex. PapDHis is in yellow and PapENtd is in blue. The N and C termini of PapENtd are labeled in blue. The PapDHis G1 and PapENtd A1, A2, and F strands are labeled in magenta. (C) Electron density of PapENtdKNte from a map calculated using density-modified experimental SAD phases to 1.87 Å. Color-coding and representation of the model are as in (A). Residues of PapKNte are labeled. (D) Stereo ribbon diagram of the PapENtdPapKNte complex. PapENtd is in cyan; PapKNte is in red and labeled with a K. The N and C termini of PapENtd and PapKNte are indicated in cyan and red, respectively. The A1, A2, and F strands of PapENtd are labeled. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)

Figure 3 Donor Strand Exchange at High Resolution (A) Ribbon diagrams of PapE with complementing strands before (left, from the PapDHisPapENtd complex) and after (right, from the PapENtdKNte complex) donor strand exchange. PapENtd is in cyan, the chaperone G1 strand is in yellow, and the KNte peptide is in red. The N and C termini and the A1, A2, and F strands of PapENtd are labeled. Note the positions of the N and C termini of PapENtd before (open groove) and after (closed groove) donor strand exchange. (B) Donor strand exchange topology. Arrows indicate strands. In the chaperone-subunit complex (left), the chaperone G1 strand (yellow) runs parallel to the PapENtd F strand to complete its Ig fold in a non-canonical manner. After donor strand exchange (right), the PapK N-terminal extension (red) runs anti-parallel to the F strand to yield a canonical Ig fold. Dashed lines indicate disordered regions and the diagonal lines at either end of the chaperone G1 strand indicate additional protein not shown. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)

Figure 4 Superposition of Subunit Complexes and Definition of Positions P1-P5 (A) Stereo view of the superposition of the PapENtdKNte (cyan and red, respectively) and PapDHisPapENtd (yellow and blue, respectively) complexes. Only the G1 strand (residues 100–112) of PapDHis is shown. The various N and C termini are indicated in the same color scheme as the ribbons. Strands of PapENtd from the PapENtdKNte complex are indicated in magenta. Note particularly the positions of the PapENtd N and C termini in the more open position (blue) when in complex with PapDHis and in the more closed position (cyan) when in complex with the KNte peptide. The opposite orientation and shift in register of the two complementing strands is easily appreciated. (B) Definition of positions P1-P5 at which residues from the complementing strands interact with the hydrophobic groove of PapENtd. Superposition of the chaperone G1 strand (yellow) and the KNte peptide (red) rotated roughly 90° about a vertical axis from the view in (A). The base of subunit groove (not shown except for the Phe 138 side chain [cyan]) is on the left. The positions are indicated (P1-P5) and the side chains are shown and labeled, color-coded as the strands. The protruding Phe 138 of PapENtd that makes P4 very shallow is shown in cyan. The N and C termini of the strands are indicated, color-coded as the ribbons. Note that the N terminus of the G1 strand begins to curve away from the groove at P4, allowing the Asn 101 side chain here to run parallel to the groove rather than project into it. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)

Figure 5 Open and Closed Conformations of the Groove (A) and (B) Close-up views of the open (PapDHisPapENtd, A) and closed (PapENtdKNte, B) conformations of the PapENtd groove. In both (A) and (B), PapENtd is shown in surface representation, with the A1 and A2 strands in magenta and labeled and the F strand in cyan and labeled. The G1 (A) and KNte (B) strands are in stick representation, color-coded white, blue, and red for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, respectively. P1-P4 and the residues that occupy them are labeled in yellow. Note the closure of the groove (compare magenta and cyan surfaces in the two images). (C) and (D) Surface representations of the closed conformation of PapENtd from the PapENtdKNte complex. In (C), the surface is shown without the KNte peptide, color-coded red and blue for negative and positive charge, respectively. Positions P2-P5 are indicated in yellow; P1. Note the shallowness of position P4. In (D), the PapKNte strand is added in stick representation, colored coded as in (A) and (B). Note the snug fit of the N-terminal extension in the subunit groove. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)

Figure 6 Anchoring Interaction in the Chaperone Cleft and a Model of Subunits in a Pilus (A) Ribbon diagram of the PapDHisPapENtd complex. PapDHis is in yellow, PapENtd is in blue. Strands are labeled in magenta. The conserved Arg 8 and Lys 112 residues in the chaperone cleft interact with the C-terminal carboxylate (COO−) of the subunit at the end of the F strand, anchoring it in the cleft and properly positioning the F strand in relation to the chaperone G1 strand. (B) Topology model of three subunits in a pilus tip fibrillum. Arrows indicate strands. Each subunit donates its N-terminal extension (red) to complete the immunoglobulin-like fold of the preceding subunit in the pilus. Diagonal lines indicate additional protein not shown. Cell 2002 111, 543-551DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01050-4)