Microeconometric Modeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Part 12] 1/38 Discrete Choice Modeling Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Advertisements

[Part 13] 1/30 Discrete Choice Modeling Hybrid Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
12. Random Parameters Logit Models. Random Parameters Model Allow model parameters as well as constants to be random Allow multiple observations with.
1 ESTIMATION OF DRIVERS ROUTE CHOICE USING MULTI-PERIOD MULTINOMIAL CHOICE MODELS Stephen Clark and Dr Richard Batley Institute for Transport Studies University.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 24: Bayesian Estimation 24-1/35 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
Error Component models Ric Scarpa Prepared for the Choice Modelling Workshop 1st and 2nd of May Brisbane Powerhouse, New Farm Brisbane.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University Lab Sessions.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
15. Stated Preference Experiments. Panel Data Repeated Choice Situations Typically RP/SP constructions (experimental) Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial.
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Ranking and Rating Data in Joint RP/SP Estimation by JD Hunt, University of Calgary M Zhong, University of Calgary PROCESSUS Second International Colloquium.
Part 24: Stated Choice [1/117] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
14. Scaling and Heteroscedasticity. Using Degenerate Branches to Reveal Scaling Travel Fly Rail Air CarTrain Bus LIMB BRANCH TWIG DriveGrndPblc.
Microeconometric Modeling
1/30: Topic 4.1 – Nested Logit and Multinomial Probit Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/68: Topic 4.2 – Latent Class Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA William Greene.
Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Operators in Minnesota by David Levinson and Brian Smalkoski University of Minnesota.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/53: Topic 3.1 – Models for Ordered Choices Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA William.
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Director, ICS Consulting Presentation to WSUG Meeting
Discrete Choice Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Discrete Choice Models
A Logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data
Quiz 2-3 Review Day 2.
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Marketing Is All Around Us
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Marketing Is All Around Us
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA 5.1 Modeling Stated Preference Data

Concepts Models Revealed Preference Stated Preference Attribute Nonattendance Random Utility Attribute Space Experimental Design Choice Experiment Environmental Attitude Multinomial Logit Model Latent Class MNL Nested Logit Mixed Logit Error Components Logit

Revealed Preference Data Advantage: Actual observations on actual behavior Market (ex-post, e.g., supermarket scanner data) Individual observations Disadvantage: Limited range of choice sets and attributes – does not allow analysis of switching behavior.

Stated Preference Data Purely hypothetical – does the subject take it seriously? No necessary anchor to real market situations Vast heterogeneity across individuals E.g., contingent valuation

Strategy Repeated choice situations to explore the attribute space Typically combined RP/SP constructions Mixed data Expanded choice sets Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial Probit [marginal, impractical] Latent Class Mixed Logit

Application: Shoe Brand Choice Simulated Data: Stated Choice, 400 respondents, 8 choice situations, 3,200 observations 3 choice/attributes + NONE Fashion = High / Low Quality = High / Low Price = 25/50/75,100 coded 1,2,3,4 Heterogeneity: Sex (Male=1), Age (<25, 25-39, 40+) Underlying data generated by a 3 class latent class process (100, 200, 100 in classes)

Stated Choice Experiment: Unlabeled Alternatives, One Observation

Application: Pregnancy Care Guidelines

Application: Travel Mode Survey sample of 2,688 trips, 2 or 4 choices per situation Sample consists of 672 individuals Choice based sample Revealed/Stated choice experiment: Revealed: Drive,ShortRail,Bus,Train Hypothetical: Drive,ShortRail,Bus,Train,LightRail,ExpressBus Attributes: Cost –Fuel or fare Transit time Parking cost Access and Egress time

Customers’ Choice of Energy Supplier California, Stated Preference Survey 361 customers presented with 8-12 choice situations each Supplier attributes: Fixed price: cents per kWh Length of contract Local utility Well-known company Time-of-day rates (11¢ in day, 5¢ at night) Seasonal rates (10¢ in summer, 8¢ in winter, 6¢ in spring/fall)

Combining RP and SP Data Sets - 1 Enrich the attribute set by replicating choices E.g.: RP: Bus,Car,Train (actual) SP: Bus(1),Car(1),Train(1) Bus(2),Car(2),Train(2),… How to combine?

Each person makes four choices from a choice set that includes either two or four alternatives. The first choice is the RP between two of the RP alternatives The second-fourth are the SP among four of the six SP alternatives. There are ten alternatives in total.

Willingness to Pay for Green Energy

Stated Choice Experiment: Travel Mode by Sydney Commuters