The Dred Scott Decision

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Advertisements

Sectionalism What issues divided the country and the legislation that tried to keep the country together.
CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
The Crisis Turns Violent Why did a civil war break out in Kansas? How did the Dred Scott decision divide the nation?
Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
The Republican Party -Birth of the Republican party 1854
The Dred Scott Decision
II. Basis of Citizenship
Extending Rights to All present What documents and institutions protect the rights of Americans?
leading to the Civil War Lincoln/Douglas Debates
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
Dred Scott Decision :The Worst Decision the Supreme Court Ever Made Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) Dred Scott.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.
WYATT,WYATT,WYATT!!!. COMPROMISES EVENTS LEADING TO THE CIVIL WAR.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Sec 2: Bloodshed in Kansas After the Compromise of 1850, Northern abolitionists continue to attack slavery. In reaction to the Fugitive Slave Law of.
Lesson 4: Attempts at Compromise Aim: What were the attempts at compromise that were made prior to the start of the Civil War?
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Slavery and Secession. The Birth of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
 Dred Scott was a slave.  He had lived in a free territory with his owner.  His owner moved back into a slave state.  While there, the.
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Warm Up You will be given 5 minutes to complete the following: Read the passage titled, “The Kansas-Nebraska Act” on page 431. In your own words, describe.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Causes of the Civil War.
Chapter 5, Lesson 3 Compromise and Conflict
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
The Civil War 1861 – 1865.
Dred Scott.
Changing the Law of the Land
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Dred Scott v. Sanford.
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
Famous Abolitionists.
Today’s Aim: How did the debate over slavery escalate after 1850?
Syllabus Write down one of the expectations on the standards and benchmarks section. If you turn in a productivity assignment late, do you get credit?
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
ROGER TANEY, CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME COURT DRED SCOTT
What makes you an “American” citizen?
The Causes of the Civil War
Dred Scot Decision.
Dred Scot Decision.
Causes of the Civil War.
Pre-Civil War compromises and events
The Compromise Missouri Compromise (1820)
Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision. Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas Dred Scott.
Events that Helped Spark the Civil War By: Mrs. Andreatta
SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.
Dred Scot Decision.
Westward Expansion: Institution of Slavery
Review.
And The case for freedom
SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Review.
Review.
Presentation transcript:

The Dred Scott Decision

In your group: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.

With your group and using your definition of property, decide what you would do in the situation below. Write your answer on the worksheet provided You live in California where they allow you to own a puppy. You then move with your family to New York State where puppies are not allowed. Does the puppy still belong to you? Why or why not? Later, after several years, you move back to California. Does the dog still belong to you? Why or why not?

With your group, using your definition of property, and your ideas from the previous dog situation, answer the question below. Write your answer on your composition book. Does Congress have the right to say that you do not own the puppy because it was in a state that has a no dogs allowed law?

Who was Dred Scott? Dred Scott was the name of an African-American slave. He was taken by his master, an officer in the U.S. Army, from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then to the free territory of Wisconsin. He lived on free soil for a long period of time. When the Army ordered his master to go back to Missouri, he took Scott with him back to that slave state, where his master died. In 1846, Scott was helped by Abolitionist lawyers to sue for his freedom in court, claiming he should be free since he had lived on free soil for a long time.

Who was his owner? Dr. John Emerson was a doctor in the United States army. The army required him to move throughout the United States. He did not decide to move on his own.

What Happened? Emerson is transferred back to Missouri – A Slave State He passes away shortly after. Emerson is stationed in Missouri – A Slave State Emerson is transferred to Illinois – A Non-Slave State Emerson is transferred to Wisconsin – A Non-Slave State

Let’s hear the arguments Analyze the Primary Source Documents to provide different sides of the arguments regarding the Dred Scott case

The Two Sides of the Argument What is the problem? Dred Scott Lived in a non-slave area long enough to be considered a free man. His owner passed away, therefore he does not have an owner US Supreme Court Dred Scott was not a US Citizen because he was a slave Congress has no right to control a person’s property

What would your decision be? DO YOU AGREE, DISAGREE OR REMAIN NEUTRAL? Think about the arguments. STAND UP AND CHOOSE A SIDE!

Leading to War How might this event have contributed to the start of the Civil War?