Riverside County AMAO Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riverside County Class of 2009 Dropout and Graduation Rates Shannon Wells, PhD.
Advertisements

MSJC Stats BOT Workshop R.C. Economic Recap MSJC -Headcount -Available seats College Going Rates City/Zip Codes Transfers Assessment MSJC Stats.
1 The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California’s Implementation of No Child Left Behind Coachella Valley Unified School District Dr. Paul Grafton.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
AVID Excel An Introduction.
Tech Prep Articulation Susanne Mata, Coordinator of Special Programs, Career Education.
AVID Excel Goal To interrupt students’ path to long-term ELL status, accelerate their language acquisition, and put them on the path to AVID and college.
English Language Learner Placement WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT “To Achieve and Maintain Excellence” Office of Federal & State Categorical Programs.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
ESL Results and Targets Montgomery County Schools.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Governor’s Local Control Funding Formula Administrative Council March 11, 2013.
2010 High School Admission Practices. SOAR (Student Orientation, Advising and Registration) Financial Aid & Scholarships (i.e., Presidential Scholarship.
2011 High School Admission Practices. Number of Applicants Number of Admits Average SAT Score Average ACT Score Average GPA 10,9124, (local)
Tech Prep Articulation Process Susanne Mata, Coordinator of Special Programs, Career Education.
2012 High School Admission Practices. Number of Applicants Number of Admits Average SAT Score Average ACT Score Average GPA 12,2297, (local)
Reflections on Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: Differentiated Instruction (DI) RCOE Division of Educational Services Mike Barney: Director.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
English Learner College Readiness AVID Excel An Introduction.
Riverside County 2012 API and AYP Achievement Gap Mitch Aulakh.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
LEUSD Mobility Tracking Best Practice Shannon Wells, Ph.D.
What is the CELDT? California English Language Development Test.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY: ANALYSIS Emanuel Alvarez June 25, 2011 Dr. Lee.
South Lewis Central School District. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations (District-Wide) ELA - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank.
ELD/CELDT Update.  12% of total population  393 students  Bagby—11%  Fammatre—15%  Farnham—12%  Sartorette—18%  Price—8%  37 Languages/All student.
English Learner Update Cambrian School District February 9, 2012.
CELDT.
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
Base API Changes Riverside County Assessment Network Wes Scott Key Data Systems 1.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Riverside County AMAO Performance Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh.
ELAC Meeting 2 CELDT Scores and Moving forward February 9, 2016 Lilia Woo Tsui, ELD Kolb Elementary School.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS Updated as of 8/9/10 All information is subject to change without notice 1.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS Updated as of 4/12/10 1.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HOMEOWNERSHIP PROGRAMS Updated as of 11/5/09 1.
Menifee Union School District Overview of the English Language Learners’ Program Presentation to the Governing Board July 25, 2006.
DELAC DISTRICT ENGLISH LEARNER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARCH 15, 2010.
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A CLASS MAKES Sharing Data on Student Success.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Poway Unified School District.  The goal of the English Learner Program is to help students learn both social and academic English. Listening Speaking.
Riverside County’s Long-Term English Learner (LTEL) Task Force.
Assessment and Accountability
League of California Cities
Updates on Special Education
Assessment and Accountability
PARCC Results Summary Report.
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Cal-PASS Plus & RCAN January 28, 2016.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
PIT 2017 Point-In-Time Count Data Review & Analysis 2017
Assessment and Accountability
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Assessment and Accountability
REDUCING CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM FAMILY ENGAGEMENT NETWORK 3/14/18
Dual-Credit Objectives
Long-Term English Learner
San Leandro USD DELAC Meeting
Simi Valley Unified School District CAASPP Data
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
The RFEP Process RFEP: Redesignated Fluent English Proficient
2011 County CMA Results Riverside County Assessment Network
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Presentation transcript:

Riverside County 2010-2012 AMAO Performance Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh

Overview From 2010-2012, how have districts in Riverside County performed on AMAOs at the elementary, middle, and high school levels? What sort of growth has been realized by each district on the various AMAOs

Overview What can the similarities in performance on various measures tell us about district successes and struggles? Are there any practices that you’ve found to be particularly successful that could be shared out?

AMAO 1 Are students increasing their English proficiency as determined by CELDT? Students must increase one or more CELDT level Or maintain at early advanced or advanced (CELDT 4 or 5) Targets increase slightly each year

AMAO 2 Rules for Cohort Inclusion: Prior to 2010 Prior year beginning or early intermediate Current proficient Been in US schools at least 4 years Prior year intermediate Prior year early advanced or advanced Not English proficient prior year Any of these criteria met, must obtain target level of Fluent English Proficient Must score early advanced or advanced overall and score no lower than intermediate on any component of CELDT (reading, writing, listening, and speaking)

AMAO 2a and 2b Percent of Students Scoring Fluent English Proficient (FEP) AMAO 2a Students in US school LESS than 5 years AMAO 2 Students in US school More than 5 years

Riverside county ES, ms, & hs performance 2010-2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, and AMAO 3 Riverside county ES, ms, & hs performance

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 ES Level AMAO Growth AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math Percent Rank Alvord Unified 12.6 13 1 9 3.3 12 6.9 5 2.7 14 Banning Unified 20.3 0.6 10 10.7 4 7.9 3 7.8 Beaumont Unified 4.2 20 -1.3 15 -8.1 21 8.1 2 6.3 Coachella Valley Unified 12.8 11 -1 1.2 -0.9 18 Corona-Norco Unified 10.9 16 -2.9 6.1 8 3.4 Desert Sands Unified 12.5 1.6 6 12.9 2.2 Hemet Unified -1.4 0.8 17 2.3 19 2.1 Jurupa Unified 4.3 7.4 7 Lake Elsinore Unified 15.1 -1.2 10.3 -11.6 -10.9 Menifee Union Elementary 12.7 -1.9 5.4 Moreno Valley Unified 8.4 -9.4 0.2 5.3 5.2 Murrieta Valley Unified 20.5 1.3 6.8 Nuview Union 14.8 -0.2 14.7 11.4 Palm Springs Unified 14.2 6.2 21.9 4.5 Palo Verde Unified 29 7.5 9.6 Perris Elementary 5.6 -8.6 3.7 -2 -4.9 Riverside County Office of Ed. 2.5 -4.1 Riverside Unified 16.6 0.9 5.9 Romoland Elementary 32.5 40.1 3.1 San Jacinto Unified 8.6 -3.7 5.5 Temecula Valley Unified 11.3 10.6 3.6 County Wide   -0.7 4.7

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 MS Level AMAO Growth AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math Percent Rank Alvord Unified 5 7 -7.7 15 4.8 8 4.5 10 Banning Unified -2.7 17 -23.1 19 -3.2 6.9 7.8 3 Beaumont Unified -7.9 20 -3.1 12 -8.9 9 12.1 2 Coachella Valley Unified -0.9 14 -1.5 11 -0.4 3.2 -1 Corona-Norco Unified 4.2 -6.4 -1.1 13 2.9 2.8 Desert Sands Unified 7.4 4 -3.8 6 Hemet Unified 6.5 20.5 1.2 2.7 2.1 Jurupa Unified 5.3 5.7 4.7 6.1 Lake Elsinore Unified -3.9 -9.4 16 -4.5 -8.6 22 -5.1 Menifee Union Elementary -11.3 21 7.9 -13.4 3.9 2.3 Moreno Valley Unified 1.1 -9.5 -3.4 9.6 5.6 Murrieta Valley Unified 15.8 1 9.3 8.1 1.7 Nuview Union -57.6 -30.8 -49.4 9.8 16.5 Palm Springs Unified 7.3 8.2 -1.8 18 Palo Verde Unified 0.3 23.3 -4.6 0.7 -1.6 Perris Elementary 3.8 5.1 -2 -4.9 Perris Union High 9.5 0.8 Riverside County Office of Education -33.3 -3.3 Riverside Unified -19.4 -7.5 7.5 5.8 Romoland Elementary 3.1 -23.5 -0.7 -6.2 -12.5 San Jacinto Unified 0.6 -1.2 4.6 Temecula Valley Unified 4.9 -5.3 County Wide 2.2   -4.2

Riverside County Districts 2010-12 HS Level AMAO Growth AMAO 2a AMAO 2b AMAO 3 ELA AMAO 3 Math Percent Rank Palo Verde Unified -13.9 19 -4.0 10.0 -14.3 19.0 18.9 1 26.3 Coachella Valley Unified 3.1 7 3.5 6 2.3 -4.9 14 11.8 2 Moreno Valley Unified -4.4 15 -16.6 18 -3.4 16 10 11 3 Perris Union High 15.7 17.6 6.7 4 7.6 Palm Springs Unified 0.2 -5.2 2.1 9 -1.1 12 5 Banning Unified -2.8 -11.4 -4.5 17 13 6.9 Jurupa Unified 4.9 1.7 6.6 Corona-Norco Unified -1.7 -9.5 -0.2 5.8 8 Beaumont Unified -0.3 -20.9 -0.9 4.8 Alvord Unified 8.3 -14.2 8.6 Riverside Unified 6.3 3.7 3.6 2.2 Murrieta Valley Unified 16.8 5.0 10.7 Desert Sands Unified -1.2 -8.7 0.8 1.3 Lake Elsinore Unified -6.2 -13.6 -2.0 -8.5 Riverside County Office of Education -7.6 0.0 2.8 -1.5 San Jacinto Unified 10.6 -9.3 -5.6 Nuview Union 37.5 -2.9 Hemet Unified -5.1 1.4 -7.3 -6.5 -3.3 Temecula Valley Unified 2.9 5.9 -13.7 -10.2 County Wide 2.5   2.4 5.5

District overall performance 2012 AMAO 1, AMAO 2a & 2b, AMAO 3 District overall performance

19

Questions? Wes@KeyDataSys.com Mitchell@KeyDataSys.com