OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Luminosity Monitor Calorimeter

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting

Advertisements

Jixie Zhang Javier Gomez Oleksandr Glamazdin Roman Pomatsalyuk Vadym Vereshchaka Hall A Collabortion Meeting, Dec 2012 Hall A Moller Polarimeter 12 GeV.

D2 conceptual design and field quality optimization Ramesh Gupta, BNL Slide No. 1 Nov. 13, 2013 D2 Conceptual Design and Field Quality.

PANDA Mechanical Workshop Backward Endcap Calorimeter Geometry David Rodríguez Piñeiro GSI Darmstadt PANDA Mechanical Workshop GSI

Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.

PANDA Collaboration Meeting Backward Endcap Calorimeter Geometry David Rodríguez Piñeiro GSI Darmstadt PANDA Collaboration Meeting GSI

Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II

Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.

OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Luminosity Monitor Symmetric Möller/Bhabha Calorimeter David Rodríguez Piñeiro HIM / Mainz University OLYMPUS Collaboration.

EPFL, Design and first Prototype for a B eam P ipe D istance M onitoring Safety Switch.

MERIT Beam Collimator Design Nicholas Olesen 9 August 2006.

OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Cooling Water David Rodríguez Piñeiro Mainz University OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY

The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.

OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Luminosity Monitor Symmetric Möller/Bhabha Calorimeter David Rodríguez Piñeiro Mainz University OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting.

Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,

RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.

HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,

Robin Wines. Verbal agreement with BNL to acquire 48D48 magnet Contact at BNL indicates 4 of these magnets in storage BNL agrees to disassemble magnet.

ATF2 Magnets ATF2 Magnets 3rd July 2007Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. Info on top of FD ATF2quad for D. Urner 1 Information on top of the QC3 style quads that.

Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.

November 29, 2002 NIKHEF-1 Hans de Vries Status RF foil RF/vacuum foil  Purpose  Production methods used  Deformations: static - overpressure  Electrical.

20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.

V.Grishin, A.Koshelev, A.Larionov A.Pushkarev, V.Seleznev, M.Sleptsov A.Sytin.

RADIATION SOURCE Design Review Dmitry Gudkov BE-BI-ML.

MOLLER Spectrometer Update Juliette M. Mammei. Future Priorities (from last meeting) Physicist input to engineering (highest priority) o Magnetic force.

LHC Machine Protection System Review LHC Machine Protection System Review Oliver Aberle13 April 2005 with input from R. Assmann and R. Losito Ensuring.

HPS Beamline: Background Rates, Sensitivity to Field Uncertainties M. Ungaro1HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB, May Concrete Wall thickness Study.

Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,

October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.

Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,

Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.

Taikan SUEHARA, IN2P3-KEK collaboration meeting on ATF2, Annecy, 2007/10/15 Shintake Monitor: Installation and Commissioning Schedule Taikan SUEHARA, The.

The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.

PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLAB Warm Septum : Status Septum Team: Kees deJager, Paul Brindza, Javier Gomez, John Lerose, Al Gavalya, & me New Design.

Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.

D2 CONFIGURATIONS P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova  Starting from previous studies done at CERN, BNL and BLNL, possile cross sections of D2 dipole.

Inputs from GG6 to decisions 2,7,8,15,21,27,34 V.Telnov Aug.24, 2005, Snowmass.

CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.

Comparing current waveforms and shielding options for SMH42 Zsolt Szoke LIU-PS Meeting, 16/12/2014.

Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.

The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.

DRAFT Simulation of Errant Beams in the BDS How many bunches will damage beamline components or quench SC coils? Analysis Steps 1.Use TRANSPORT with BDS.

R. Arnold SLAC 24 June 2002 Real Photon Collaboration Conceptual Design Review Beam Monitoring Instruments.

Florian Buchsteiner (HEPHY Vienna)

9 September 2015 VXD Mechanics Summary Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna)

Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet

Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet

High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan

Test of a Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Placed in a Dipole Field

FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter

Present status of the flux return yoke design

Review on collimator movement with stepping motors

M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009

Layout of Detectors for CLIC

Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators

David Rodríguez Piñeiro GSI Darmstadt PANDA Collaboration Meeting Turin EMC BW Endcap.

Cosq configuration - Mechanics

New Design for Beam Test Structure

Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience

M. Jones B. Wojtsekhowski

Review on collimator movement with stepping motors

Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop

Area of a rectangle Tuesday, 05 February 2019 Definition:

MERIT Beam Collimator Design

GLD IR optimization and background study

Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings

Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit

Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures

Presentation transcript:

OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Luminosity Monitor Calorimeter David Rodríguez Piñeiro Mainz University OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY 23. 02. 2010 OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting Luminosity Monitor Calorimeter

1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Crystals; PbF2 Length Total Each Block 1.– Composition - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Length Total Each Block Type1 150,0 9 4-5 Type2 155,1 8 4 Type3 160,6 2 Type4 166,3 5 2-3 Type5 172,3 6 3 Type6 178,7 Type7 185,4 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Frames Cutting of the A4 Frames 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Cutting of the A4 Frames 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Assembly Base PMT Crystal Frame 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Base PMT Crystal Frame 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Collimator I Lead 10 cm Long 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Lead 10 cm Long Optimized Shape from the Target to Protect PMT and Bases 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Collimator II Preliminary Cut Views 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 200 mm 200 mm R4,47 mm Preliminary Cut Views 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Box I Fixation Collimator: With Screw 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Fixation Collimator: With Screw Crystals Support: Softer Material 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Box II Box III Lid for the Box: Light Tight 1.– Composition - Crystals - Frames - Assembly - Collimator - Box 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Lid for the Box: Light Tight Cover of the Collimator Hole 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

2.– OLYMPUS Integration 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Magnetic Fringe Field from Quad Unknown Magnetic Field I 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Coils and Quad Magnetic Fringe Field from Quad Unknown 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Detailed Studies to Be Done Magnetic Field II Box III 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Box: Soft iron Lid for the Box: MuMetal Detailed Studies to Be Done 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Clear Path from the Target Beam Pipe Modification 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Clear Path from the Target Windows 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Energy 2,0 GeV -> Angle 1,28º Angle; Interference I 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Energy 2,0 GeV -> Angle 1,28º 3200 mm 1,28º 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Energy 2,3 GeV -> Angle 1,19º Angle; Interference II 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Energy 2,3 GeV -> Angle 1,19º Calorimeter-Beam Pipe Clash 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Angle; Interference III 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Beam Pipe Radius: 19,05 mm Beam Pipe Tolerance? Minimum Distance: 2,08 mm (at 2,0 GeV) Kapton foil in between: Electrical Insulation 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Angle; Interference IV 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 4 GeV: Beam Pipe Radius: 19,05 mm 2 GeV: Beam Pipe Radius Decrease? More Space 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Angle; Interference V Beam Position Precision? Beam Angle Precision? 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration - Magnetic Field - Beam Pipe Modification - Interference 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Beam Position Precision? Beam Angle Precision? Movement Needed Due to Beam Alignment? 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

3.- Support & Alignment 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Enough Space for Alignment? Support and Alignment 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Enough Space for Alignment? 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment Full Load Attached to the Frame 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Full Load Attached to the Frame Safety Factor > 8 Regarding the elastic limit Aluminium 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Support and Alignment Total Deformation < 0,25 mm Aluminium 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Total Deformation < 0,25 mm Aluminium 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Summary Main Design Done Free Path from the Target Inputs needed: 1.– Composition 2.– OLYMPUS Integration 3.- Support & Alignment 4.- Summary Main Design Done Free Path from the Target Inputs needed: - Quad Magnetic Fringe Field - Beam Pipe Tolerance - Beam Position and Angle Precision? Enough Space for Support and Alignment? 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting

Thank you! Personal Contact: d.rodriguezpineiro@gsi.de Tel: +49 (0) 6159171/1634 web.mit.edu/OLYMPUS 23/02/2010 David Rodríguez Piñeiro - Mainz University - OLYMPUS Meeting