Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key provisions and institutional arrangements of the CDM Christine Zumkeller UNFCCC/Cooperative Mechanisms
Advertisements

1 Project Nexus Analysis of impacts and next steps Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 03 April 2012.
Good democratic governance at local level : the Council of Europe approach From multilevel governance… The European Charter of Local Self-Government subsidiarity.
Pro’s and Con’s of Codes UNC Code Administrator Working Group 28 August 2008.
Code Administrator View Tim Davis. Ofgem Principles Inclusive, accessible and effective consultation Transparent easily understood rules and processes.
© CSR Asia 2010 ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia
3rd session: Corporate Governance
The role and responsibilities of the EITI Board Members Sydney, 24 May 2013 Christian Fr. Michelet.
PART II – Management Audit: Basic Standards, Values and Norms Shared by Pratap Kumar Pathak.
Strengthening Good Governance in the Public Sector Antony Melck University of Pretoria.
Ethics and ethical research
Monitoring and Evaluation in Humanitarian Aid: Quality Procedures PROJECT – STRAND 1 – Training and Capacity Building.
Manuel Mariño Regional Director International Co-operative Alliance ACI-Américas CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CO-OPERATIVES Global Corporate Governance Forum.
Principles of Local Governance: Covering local governmental legislations and compliance issues IMFO WOMEN IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE CONFERENCE 07/02/13.
How SAIs influence Good Governance in the Public Administration: an experience of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation The Accounts Chamber of.
AUDITOR-GENERAL Presentation to the Public Service and Administration Portfolio Committee on the appointment and utilisation of consultants Report of the.
The Role & Purpose of the Customer Senate Jerry Coulton - Senator.
Corporate Governance for the Paralegal MCLE March 4, 2008 Sean P. Mahoney K&L Gates One Lincoln Street Boston, Massachusetts
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Overview of Balancing & Settlement Code Change Process By Gareth Evans on Behalf of Gazprom Marketing & Trading –Retail.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Gas Forum Proposed Process for UNC Modification Panel & Committee Elections.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Practical Initiatives For Enhancing Transparency in Local Self-Government - Lviv Workshop, April 2008.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Code Administrators Working Group (CAWG) Meeting 3, 29th October 2008.
Financial Sector Development: Building Market Foundations Through International Codes And Standards Sherman G. Boone, Assistant Director Office of International.
Mod Proposal Prevention of "Timing Out" of Authority decisions on Modification Proposals Nick Reeves.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
Governance, Risk and Ethics. 2 Section A: Governance and responsibility Section B: Internal control and review Section C: Identifying and assessing risk.
Unit Question How do ethics and the law relate and determine the sources of laws?
of the “Development Bank of Kazakhstan” JSC (as at 31 December, 2015)
at the University of Belgrade
CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMME ON BOARD INDUCTION AND EVALUATION
Chapter 6 Negotiating access and research ethics
Conducting and interpreting feedback surveys
Democracy & Good Governance
DSC Change Governance Review Group
CGR2 Summary Proposals UNC Panel 18 October 2012.
UNC NOMINATION & ELECTION PROCESSES
MODULE 4 – LEADERSHIP VALUES
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Session #2: Local Board Review of AEFLA Applications
Presentation on the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament 07 September 2016.
MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCE FUNCTION:
Safeguarding Objective Decision making
د. سفيان الإرحيم المواصفة القياسية الدولية للمسؤولية المجتمعية ”ISO 26000“ «نحو تقارير مسؤولية مجتمعية أكثر فاعلية» د. سفيان الإرحيم.
ISO المسؤوليه المجتمعيه
Purpose of Ethical Standards
Proposer: BP Gas Marketing Ltd Panel Date: 17 April 2014
WOMEN AS AGENT OF CHANGE- GOOD GOVERNANCE
Safe Guarding Decision Making
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Assignment Workshop 2 16th September 09, Solihull.
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Flow Swaps at NTS / LDZ offtakes
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Mod 0489 EU Balancing Code - Information Provision changes required to align the UNC with the EU Code Debbie Brace 25th April 2014.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Joint Office UNC Elections
Presentation transcript:

Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018 Joint Office Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018

Objective The Joint Office wishes to request the establishment of a workgroup to consider Panel Governance. The purpose of the Review Group will be to look at the effectiveness of the UNC Modification Panel and to ensure that good governance is in place.

Good Governance Principles Openness and transparency Accountability Elections and participation Efficiency and effectiveness Ethical conduct Competence and capacity Presentation of a fair, balanced and understandable assessment Rule of law Innovation and openness to change

Possible areas for consideration Is the present model “fit for purpose?” Modification Panel composition Conflicts of interests Tenure The role of SPOC’s Code of Conduct Use of Alternates Voting Modification Panel expenses Management of Alternatives Benchmarking