Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Advertisements

Bid, a Bcl2 Interacting Protein, Mediates Cytochrome c Release from Mitochondria in Response to Activation of Cell Surface Death Receptors  Xu Luo, Imawati.
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Cdk2 Kinase Is Required for Entry into Mitosis as a Positive Regulator of Cdc2–Cyclin B Kinase Activity  Thomas M Guadagno, John W Newport  Cell  Volume.
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The TFIIH Subunit Tfb3 Regulates Cullin Neddylation
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell 
Jianbo Yue, James E. Ferrell  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Cdc42-induced actin filaments are protected from capping protein
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
Claspin, a Novel Protein Required for the Activation of Chk1 during a DNA Replication Checkpoint Response in Xenopus Egg Extracts  Akiko Kumagai, William.
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Christopher W. Carroll, Maria Enquist-Newman, David O. Morgan 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Regulation of protein kinase C ζ by PI 3-kinase and PDK-1
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Rita Das, Zhaolan Zhou, Robin Reed  Molecular Cell 
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Multiubiquitin Chain Receptors Define a Layer of Substrate Selectivity in the Ubiquitin- Proteasome System  Rati Verma, Robert Oania, Johannes Graumann,
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Frank S Lee, Jeremiah Hagler, Zhijian J Chen, Tom Maniatis  Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Sequential E2s Drive Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly on APC Targets
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Reconstitution of the Transcription Factor TFIIH
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Meiotic Inactivation of Xenopus Myt1 by CDK/XRINGO, but Not CDK/Cyclin, via Site- Specific Phosphorylation  E. Josué Ruiz, Tim Hunt, Angel R. Nebreda 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Andreas Mayer, William Wickner, Albert Haas  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Presentation transcript:

Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond J Deshaies  Molecular Cell  Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 439-448 (August 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2

Figure 1 Purification of Sic1/S-Cdk Substrate Complex and the 26S Proteasome and Assessment of Their Purities by SDS-PAGE and Immunological Analysis (a) Sic1/GST-Cdc28HA/Clb5 complexes were purified from insect cells by glutathione affinity chromatography, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue. Similar results were obtained with complexes that contained HA6Clb5, but the tagged HA6Clb5 and GST-Cdc28HA subunits comigrated and could no longer be resolved (Figure 2b). (b) 26S proteasomes were purified by anti-Flag affinity chromatography (Verma et al., 2000) from PRE1Flag-His6 wild-type DOA3 (lane 2), PRE1Flag-His6doa3 mutant (lane 3), and PRE1 untagged cells (lane 4), fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue. (c) Aliquots of yeast extracts (lanes 1–3; 1× = 25 ng) or purified 26S proteasomes (3 μg; discussed in the article) containing Ub-Sic1 and 1X ATP regenerating system (lane 6) or not (lane 4), were resolved on SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted for the presence of Rpt1, Cdc48, and the Hsc82 and Hsp 70 families of stress proteins using antisera specific for the proteins. (d) E1 (Uba1His6) and E2 (Cdc34) enzymes were purified from budding yeast and E. coli, respectively, as described previously (Seol et al., 1999). Aliquots were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue Molecular Cell 2001 8, 439-448DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2)

Figure 4 S-Cdk Is Activated Efficiently upon Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 (a) Ubiquitinated or unmodified Sic1 (300 nM), complexed with GST-Cdc28HA and Clb5 (see Figure 1a), was incubated with purified 26S proteasomes (100 nM) at 30°C for the indicated length of time. Each reaction was stopped by the addition of 1ml ice-cold STOP solution (see Experimental Procedures), and the diluted mix was bound to glutathione beads. Glutathione agarose-bound protein kinase was assayed as described in Experimental Procedures, and reactions were fractionated by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography to reveal phosphorylated histone H1 (bottom panel) and by immunoblotting with Sic1 antiserum to visualize Sic1 levels (top panel). (b) Reactions were quantitated as described in Figure 2c. (c–e) Efficiency of S-Cdk activation. S-Cdk complexes were expressed in insect cells in the absence (dimer) or presence (trimer) of Sic1 and purified by glutathione affinity chromatography as detailed in Experimental Procedures. (c) Aliquots were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue. (d) Equivalent amounts were then incubated with the ubiquitination machinery as in Figure 2a. Two microliters of the supernatants from the SCF ubiquitination reaction were incubated with 26S proteasomes, and H1 kinase activity was determined as described in the main body of the text. (e) The amount of GST-Cdc28 recovered was determined by immunoblotting with affinity purified anti-GST antibody Molecular Cell 2001 8, 439-448DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2)

Figure 2 Subunit-Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasomes Is ATP and DOA3 Dependent (a) Sic1, complexed with GST-Cdc28HA and HA6Clb5, was phosphorylated with immobilized recombinant G1-Cdk. Phosphorylated substrate was recovered in the supernatant fraction and subsequently incubated with Cdc34 (E2) and immobilized recombinant SCFCdc4 in the absence or presence of ubiquitin and E1 to yield unmodified or Ub-Sic1 substrate complexes, respectively (Seol et al., 1999). Under the conditions used, essentially 100% of the input Sic1 was converted to ubiquitinated species (Figure 4a, lane 5). (b) To provide an internal control for the degradation reactions, Ub-Sic1 and unmodified Sic1 were mixed in equimolar amounts (approximately 300 nM each) and supplemented with purified 26S proteasome (100 nM) and 3 mM ATP, or the Sic1 substrate complexes (modified and unmodified) were assayed separately (Figure 4a). Degradation reactions were stopped by the addition of 5× SDS buffer, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and evaluated by immunoblotting with anti-Sic1 polyclonal antibodies (b, top two panels) or anti-HA monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (b, bottom panel). Ub-Sic1 and unmodified Sic1 were evaluated on 8% and 10% polyacrylamide gels, respectively. Immunoblot analysis of individual proteins revealed that GST-Cdc28HA and HA6Clb5 comigrated. A lack of Cdc28 degradation was confirmed using anti-GST serum (data not shown). A lack of Clb5 degradation was independently confirmed by the generation of Cdc28/Clb5 kinase activity (Figure 4). (c) Quantitation of the degradation reactions shown in (b). Similar results were obtained by either PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics STORM system; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) or by analysis of scanned autoradiograms with NIH Image. (d) 26S proteasomes were prepared from either untagged (lanes 1 and 2), PRE1Flag-His6 wild-type DOA3 (lanes 3–5), or PRE1Flag-His6 doa3 mutant (lanes 6 and 7) cells, as indicated. Degradation reactions were performed and visualized as described in (b). The reaction shown in lane 5 was supplemented with 2 μM ubiquitin aldehyde (Ubal). (e) Affinity-purified 26S proteasomes were incubated with Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk substrate in the presence or absence of ATP. Lane 1 is a zero time point sampled prior to addition of 26S, whereas all other lanes contained 26S proteasomes. ATP depletion was achieved by preincubating 26S proteasomes at 30°C for 5 min in the absence (lane 4) or presence of 15 U/ml apyrase (+Apy; lane 5) or 5 U/ml hexokinase plus 30 mM glucose (+Hxk,Glu; lane 6) before the addition of Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk. No preincubation was done in lane 3. Degradation was allowed to proceed for 5 min at 30°C after addition of Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk, and reactions were stopped and visualized as described in (b) Molecular Cell 2001 8, 439-448DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2)

Figure 3 Stability of the Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk Complex (a) Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk (300 nM), prepared as described in Figure 2, was incubated at 30°C for varying lengths of time with 9 μM Mbp-Sic1mycHis6 purified from E. coli as described (Verma et al., 1997b). At the end of the incubation, S-Cdk was precipitated by glutathione beads, and the amount of Mbp-Sic1mycHis6 recruited into the complex in exchange for Ub-Sic1 was determined by immunoblotting with affinity-purified anti-Mbp polyclonal antibody. (b) Quantitation was performed as described in Figure 2c. Maximal recruitment was achieved at 9 hr, with no further increases at 16 and 24 hr (not shown), and the amount of Mbp-Sic1mycHis6 recovered was stoichiometric with the amount of Clb5 present in the original Ub-Sic1/S-Cdk complex. For the sample shown in lane 8, 9 μM Mbp-Sic1mycHis6 was incubated alone for 9 hr before being incubated with glutathione beads Molecular Cell 2001 8, 439-448DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2)

Figure 5 Limited Activation of S-Cdk Kinase by doa3 Mutant Proteasomes (a) 26S proteasomes were prepared from DOA3 wild-type or doa3 mutant cells as described in Figure 1 and treated with (+) or without (−) Apyrase as described in Figure 2. Ub Sic1/S-Cdk (300 nM) was incubated with the different 26S preparations (100 nM) for 5 min at 30°C at the end of which aliquots were withdrawn for monitoring degradation by immunoblotting with anti-Sic1 polyclonal antibody. (b) The remainder of the reaction mix was diluted with ice-cold STOP mix and was processed for H1 kinase activity as described in Figure 4 Molecular Cell 2001 8, 439-448DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00308-2)