Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The determination of a dose deposited in reference medium due to (p,n) reaction occurring during proton therapy Anna Dawidowska, Monika Paluch Ferszt,
Advertisements

Management of independent motion between multiple targets in lung cancer radiation therapy  Feng Liu, PhD, An Tai, PhD, Ergun Ahunbay, PhD, Elizabeth.
John Boyle, MD, Brad Ackerson, MD, Lin Gu, MS, Chris R. Kelsey, MD 
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Five-Year Biochemical Results, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Delivery of Dose-Escalated Image Guided Proton Therapy for Prostate.
Progressive brain metastases in an EGFR mutated adenocarcinoma of the lung: Response to gefitinib after progression on erlotinib  C. Leitner, R. von Moos,
Catarina Dinis Fernandes, Cuong V. Dinh, Marcel J. Steggerda, Leon C
Assessment of leakage dose in vivo in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer  Peta Lonski, Tomas Kron, Michael Taylor, Alicia Phipps, Rick.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose positron emission tomography guided functional treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver tumours 
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Michiel van den Bosch, Michel Öllers, Bart Reymen, Wouter van Elmpt 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 
Head Posture and Neck Pain of Chronic Nontraumatic Origin: A Comparison Between Patients and Pain-Free Persons  Anabela G. Silva, MSc, T. David Punt,
National audit of a system for rectal contact brachytherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Improving CT quality with optimized image parameters for radiation treatment planning and delivery guidance  Guang-Pei Chen, George Noid, An Tai, Feng.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment.
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics features during dose-painted radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer  Sangjune.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy  Joshua Stoker, Sujay Vora, Ameet Patel, David.
Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer  Nina Boje.
Simultaneous integrated prophylactic cranial irradiation in sino-nasal cancer  Kenneth Jensen, Maja Bendtsen Sharma, Simon Lenler-Eriksen, Per Friis, Anne.
A multi-centre analysis of radiotherapy beam output measurement
Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy  Nicholas J. Lowther, David A.
Lung Cancer Screening and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Evaluating the prevalence and predictive factors of vasomotor and psychological symptoms in prostate cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy: Results.
On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems  Nick Reynaert, Frederik Crop, Edmond Sterpin, Iwan Kawrakow,
Angjelina Protik, Marcel van Herk, Marnix Witte, Jan-Jakob Sonke 
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski 
Catarina Dinis Fernandes, Cuong V. Dinh, Marcel J. Steggerda, Leon C
Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most?  Georgios Ntentas, DPhil, Katerina Dedeckova, MD, Michal.
Uncertainty evaluation of image-based tumour control probability models in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using a visual analytic tool  Oscar Casares-Magaz,
The posterior cerebellum, a new organ at risk?
Rectal volume variations and estimated rectal dose during 8 weeks of image-guided radical 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer 
Plasma proteins as prognostic biomarkers in radiotherapy treated head and neck cancer patients  Line Brøndum, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Brita Singers Sørensen,
Organization news Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
In This Issue Molecular Therapy Volume 16, Issue 4, (April 2008)
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Aisling Krishnan, Yat Man Tsang, Adéle Stewart-Lord 
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a potential tool to assess and guide salivary gland irradiation 
European Lung Cancer Conference (ELCC) 2016 Organisation
Todd J. Carpenter, MD, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, MD 
Rune Slot Thing, Uffe Bernchou, Olfred Hansen, Carsten Brink 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer  Jan Seppälä, Aleksi Voutilainen,
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
MRI basics for radiation oncologists
Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of two delineation guidelines for the radiation treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma  C. Bondue, S. Racadot,
Presentation transcript:

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Comparison of single and dual energy CT for stopping power determination in proton therapy of head and neck cancer  Vicki Trier Taasti, Ludvig Paul Muren, Kenneth Jensen, Jørgen Breede Baltzer Petersen, Jesper Thygesen, Anna Tietze, Cai Grau, David Christoffer Hansen  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 6, Pages 14-19 (April 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.002 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Difference maps for patient No. 2. (a) WEPL difference map. (b) SPR difference map. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 14-19DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.002) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 SPR histograms for each ROI. The upper row is for patient No. 1, (Group A: Dual Source), and the lower row represents patient No. 14 (Group B: Consecutive Scanning). The mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) for the distributions are given in the legends. These are most meaningful for the ROIs in the brain and in the eyes where the SPR distributions follow a normal distribution. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 6, 14-19DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.002) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions