HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSO/NGO Consultations Report to IATI Signatories, Partner Countries and Steering Committee Paris, 4 July 2011.
Advertisements

Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness An opportunity to forge a new consensus on aid and development? Aid Effectiveness Division Development Cooperation.
KEMENTERIAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL/ BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL Overview On Knowledge Sharing And How To Foster More Efficient Ways.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
1 Development Cooperation Policies Trade Union Development Cooperation Network February 2009.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
Approach to 6AMCDRR Background Studies: Contribution of HFA1 learning and HFA2 consultations Madhavi Ariyabandu Programme Officer UNISDR Asia Pacific Meeting.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN ASIA PACIFIC: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
Involving trade union in Effectiveness Development Cooperation
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Eduardo González Aid Quality Division DCD-OECD 9 May, 2011 Update in THE ROAD TO BUSAN.
UNECE Workshop on Measuring Sustainable Development – 29 October 2012, Geneva Erol Cavus Project Manager ENPI-SEIS Project Implications from Rio+20 for.
After Busan, the Emerging Development Agendas Hubert de MILLY, Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
Draft tool to measure public private cooperation Advisory Notes OECD Busan Partnership Principles – private sector participation March 2014 By James Brew.
Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Key findings Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop Seoul, March 2014.
Regional Forum On CSO Governance Post-Busan Challenges On CSO Development Effectiveness Work at a Regional Level December 14, 2011 Borithy LUN Executive.
The International Framework of Aid and Development Effectiveness Karin Fällman, Sida 13 February 2014.
1 Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS.
Global Partnership and Aid Lee, Kye Woo KDI School of Public Policy and Management.
Gender and Development Effectiveness. Entry points for Tanzania? DPG Main, 8 May 2012 Anna Collins-Falk, Representative, UN Women on behalf of DPG Gender.
Composition and Mandate BetterAid is the successor to the CSO Parallel Forum of the Accra High Level Forum organized since January It is designed.
Overview Outcomes from Busan HLF 4 Faye Lee, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Cooperation.
Findings from the gender equality module of the 2011 Paris Declaration Survey: Towards HLF-4 Jenny Hedman DAC Network on Gender Equality 28 July 2011.
CSO Development Effectiveness and Promotion of an Enabling Environment
CSO Development Effectiveness By Justin Kilcullen European Representative CPDE.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
The Reform of the Aid Cooperation Architecture- and the role of Civil Society Aid Effectiveness: From Paris 2005 to Paris 2012 Peter Lanzet, BfdW, for.
BEYOND MKUKUTA FRAMEWORK: Monitoring and Evaluation, Communication and Implementation Guide Presentation to the DPG Meeting 18 th January, 2011.
HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS Building Blocks Core Busan Commitments Common principles.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
Localizing the Paris Declaration and Improving Aid Coordination and Effectiveness in Papua New Guinea – Our Experience Presentation to the Regional Aid.
Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results: The Busan Action Plan for Statistics PARIS21 & The World BankMeeting on the Busan Action Plan.
Embracing the Paris Principles and AAA to Curb Corruption and Enhance Development Performance Mitchell O’Brien Governance Specialist Team Lead – Parliament.
A Primer on the CSO Development Effectiveness Process October
1 Sequenced Information Strategy –incorporating short-term programme proposal Paris21 Consortium meeting : June 2000 Tony Williams UK Department.
1. Background to CSO Development Effectiveness 2. What is the Open Forum process 3. International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness 5. GLOBAL.
GFG-BACG Meeting: Harnosand, Sweden March 14,
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Inclusive Partnerships & Multi-stakeholder Approaches Busan Partnership Workshop Nov. 6-7, 2014 Break-out Session 4 Jacqueline Wood for the Task Team on.
Vienna, Austria March 4 th, 2014 Arab Aid Development Effectiveness Workshop GPEDC Background & Indicators.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Indicator on Use of Results Framework Seoul GP Annual Workshop Indicator Clinic 6 November 2014effectivecooperation.org.
Viet Nam Partnership Document (VPD) Hanoi, November 7, 2012 MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT CAO MANH CUONG DGG- FERD/MPI AEF NATIONAL COORDINATOR.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
Achievement of MDG Target for Sanitation SDGs and Way Forward Mr. Irfan Tariq, Director General, The Ministry of Climate Change, Pakistan High Level Ministerial.
Effective development cooperation principles and quality of partnerships in the post-2015 and Financing for Development context ---Bangladesh perspective.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
World Bank Safeguards Review and Update
The Global Partnership
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Vincent Grimaud, Head of Unit
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014
SAI Engagement with External Stakeholders
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
Co Chair, BetterAid Open Platform for Development Effectiveness
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics
Busan Partnership for Climate Finance and Development Effectiveness
Land Policy Initiative and the Civil Society Platform
Septiembre 2017 Mexico’s Monitoring Pilot
A year of progress on global and country coordination on PHC
Presentation transcript:

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS Building Blocks Core Busan Commitments Common principles

Monitoring framework: COUNTRY LEVEL FRAMEWORKS Own indicators and targets Lead by the country Results made public + INTERNATIONAL LEVEL FRAMEWORK Selective indicators and targets drawing on a set of core country level indicators Monitor progress on a rolling basis Managed by the Global Partnership Issues under discussion: Scope of monitoring – broad convergence around a number of themes, but desirability to prioritise further? No convergence regarding the number ( Linkages between global monitoring and country level efforts OECD tasked to develop indicators by May 2012 and consult with all relevant stakeholders. Likely outcome:

Core Busan commitments New Deal Fragile states Effective Institutions Results & accountability Statistics Gender Climate Change Financing Public Private cooperation Transparency South South Cooperation Diversity & Fragmentation Building Blocks

Core Busan commitments New Deal Fragile states Effective Institutions Results & accountability Statistics Gender Climate Change Financing Public Private cooperation Transparency South South Cooperation Diversity & Fragmentation HRBA Building Blocks

Questions to address Which Building Blocs are most relevant (1-5) How should we engage? Global but also in-country Country list Support (research, drafting positions) How do we relate/use the CSO platform Who is volunteering/leading for bb On-line support groups for building blocs Reacting to documents Oversight group (online + Paris)

CSO platform 15 sub-regions + 6 regions Sectors: labour, women, faith based, rural folk, indigenous, youth, INGOs, … 6 TU representatives Specific action plan for ITUC (integrated/separated?) How to engage Regional/sub-regional level International level How important should this be for us