Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Mediates One Component of Competitive, Experience- Dependent Plasticity in Developing Visual Cortex  Megumi Kaneko, David Stellwagen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Synaptic AMPA Receptor Exchange Maintains Bidirectional Plasticity
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Mark E.J. Sheffield, Michael D. Adoff, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Sharif Taha, Michael P. Stryker  Neuron 
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Endocannabinoids Control the Induction of Cerebellar LTD
Burst-Timing-Dependent Plasticity of NMDA Receptor-Mediated Transmission in Midbrain Dopamine Neurons  Mark T. Harnett, Brian E. Bernier, Kee-Chan Ahn,
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Spike-Timing-Dependent Potentiation of Sensory Surround in the Somatosensory Cortex Is Facilitated by Deprivation-Mediated Disinhibition  Frédéric Gambino,
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Firing Rate Homeostasis in Visual Cortex of Freely Behaving Rodents
Environmental Enrichment Rescues Binocular Matching of Orientation Preference in Mice that Have a Precocious Critical Period  Bor-Shuen Wang, Liang Feng,
Cristopher M. Niell, Michael P. Stryker  Neuron 
PSA–NCAM Is Required for Activity-Induced Synaptic Plasticity
Sensory Deprivation Unmasks a PKA-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Mechanism that Operates in Parallel with CaMKII  Neil Hardingham, Nick Wright, James Dachtler,
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Leslie R. Whitaker, Mickael Degoulet, Hitoshi Morikawa  Neuron 
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
The Environment versus Genetics in Controlling the Contribution of MAP Kinases to Synaptic Plasticity  Shaomin Li, Xuejun Tian, Dean M. Hartley, Larry.
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Instructive Effect of Visual Experience in Mouse Visual Cortex
Sensory Deprivation Unmasks a PKA-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Mechanism that Operates in Parallel with CaMKII  Neil Hardingham, Nick Wright, James Dachtler,
Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System  Yangling Mu, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Sleep Enhances Plasticity in the Developing Visual Cortex
Rosanna P. Sammons, Claudia Clopath, Samuel J. Barnes  Cell Reports 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Differential Expression of Posttetanic Potentiation and Retrograde Signaling Mediate Target-Dependent Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity  Michael Beierlein,
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Serotonin Mediates Cross-Modal Reorganization of Cortical Circuits
Distinct Eligibility Traces for LTP and LTD in Cortical Synapses
Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking  C. Daniel Meliza, Yang Dan  Neuron  Volume.
Synaptic transmission and plasticity is disturbed in 2-week-old but not in adult SynDIG1 β-gal mutant mice. Synaptic transmission and plasticity is disturbed.
Huibert D Mansvelder, Daniel S McGehee  Neuron 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Adenosine and ATP Link PCO2 to Cortical Excitability via pH
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Ning Tian, David R Copenhagen  Neuron 
Hebbian and Homeostatic Plasticity Mechanisms in Regular Spiking and Intrinsic Bursting Cells of Cortical Layer 5  Stuart David Greenhill, Adam Ranson,
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Bor-Shuen Wang, Rashmi Sarnaik, Jianhua Cang  Neuron 
Neuronal Plasticity: Beyond the Critical Period
Sylvain Chauvette, Josée Seigneur, Igor Timofeev  Neuron 
Dopamine-Dependent Interactions between Limbic and Prefrontal Cortical Plasticity in the Nucleus Accumbens: Disruption by Cocaine Sensitization  Yukiori.
Metaplasticity of Hypothalamic Synapses following In Vivo Challenge
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Burst-Timing-Dependent Plasticity of NMDA Receptor-Mediated Transmission in Midbrain Dopamine Neurons  Mark T. Harnett, Brian E. Bernier, Kee-Chan Ahn,
Sharif Taha, Jessica L Hanover, Alcino J Silva, Michael P Stryker 
Vision and Cortical Map Development
Multisensory Integration in the Mouse Striatum
Pernille Bülow, T.J. Murphy, Gary J. Bassell, Peter Wenner 
Neuronal Plasticity: Beyond the Critical Period
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Joram J. van Rheede, Blake A. Richards, Colin J. Akerman  Neuron 
Postsynaptic Complexin Controls AMPA Receptor Exocytosis during LTP
Presentation transcript:

Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Mediates One Component of Competitive, Experience- Dependent Plasticity in Developing Visual Cortex  Megumi Kaneko, David Stellwagen, Robert C. Malenka, Michael P. Stryker  Neuron  Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 673-680 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.023 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Normal Long-Term Potentiation and Deficient Synaptic Scaling in Visual Cortical Slices Prepared from TNFα Knockout Mice (A) LTP is normal in Tnf−/− mice (n = 6) compared to wild-type mice (n = 9). The peak amplitudes of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) recorded in layer 2/3 in response to layer 4 stimulation are plotted as a function of time. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) was delivered at time 0. Insets on the right show example traces of fEPSP (averaged responses [6 traces = 1 min] from around 1 and 2 in the graph). The smaller trace is pre-LTP (1) and the larger trace post-LTP (2). (B–D) Homeostatic synaptic scaling assayed in organotypic slice cultures of mouse visual cortex prepared from Tnf−/− and Tnf+/+ mice. The amplitudes of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC) are increased after 2 days of blockade of glutamatergic excitatory transmission (using CNQX/APV) in Tnf+/+ but not in Tnf−/− mice (n = 10–13 cells per condition). Error bars show SEM. Neuron 2008 58, 673-680DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.023) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Plasticity following Monocular Visual Deprivation Is Reduced in Tnf−/− Mice (A) Ocular dominance index (ODI) in individual animals (circles) and group average (horizontal line) computed from responses measured by intrinsic signal optical imaging. The gray box represents the mean ± SD of baseline ODI in Tnf+/+ animals with no deprivation. ND, no deprivation; MD, 5 days of monocular deprivation starting at P26–27. Inbred C57/Bl6 wild-type animals received cortical infusion of soluble TNF receptor 1 (sTR) or vehicle (veh) during the MD. ∗∗p < 0.001 and ∗p < 0.01 versus corresponding ND group; §p < 0.05 versus Tnf+/+ MD; †p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated animals. The inset on the right illustrates the visual stimuli used to evoke intrinsic signal responses in the binocular zone. (B) Distribution of ocular dominance scores of single units recorded electrophysiologically in Tnf+/+, Tnf+/−, or Tnf−/− mice after 5 days of MD starting at P26–27 and in age-matched animals without visual deprivation (ND). Data from Tnf+/+ and Tnf+/− mice were pooled because no significant difference was detected in ODIs between these two groups. Control (Tnf+/+ and Tnf+/−) ND: 3 mice, 78 cells; control MD: 4 mice, 122 cells; Tnf−/− ND: 3 mice, 101 cells; Tnf−/− MD: 4 mice 121 cells. p values in the figure were from a Fisher exact test. (C) Contralateral bias index (CBI), which measures relative responses of single neurons to the two eyes, shown for individual animals (circles) and average group values (horizontal lines) computed from single-unit data presented in (B). The gray box indicates the mean ± SD of baseline CBI in control animals. ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗p < 0.05 versus corresponding ND group; §p < 0.05 versus MD-Tnf+/+ group. Statistical analyses in (A) and (C) were performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Neuron 2008 58, 673-680DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.023) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Repeated Imaging of Intrinsic Signal Reveals that Lack of TNFα Signaling Impairs the Delayed Component of Plasticity Induced by MD (A and B) Average signal amplitude of the deprived-eye response (A) and open-eye response (B) in the binocular visual area, before the lid suture (pre-MD), after 2.5–3 days of MD (MD3), and after 5–6 days of MD (MD5-6) in Tnf+/+ (n = 6) and Tnf−/− (n = 7) mice. All data from longitudinal measurements are in the same individual animals. (C and D) Average signal amplitude of the deprived-eye response (C) and open-eye response (D) in the binocular visual area in inbred C57Bl6 wild-type mice treated with cortical infusion of soluble TNF receptor1 (sTR) (n = 7) or vehicle solution (n = 5), before the lid suture and after 5 days of MD. Values in (A)–(D) present mean ± SEM of the group. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05 compared with baseline (pre-MD), repeated-measure ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. (E and F) Changes in response amplitude from baseline following MD. Fractional changes in average response to deprived eye (E) and open eye (F) were calculated from measurements presented in (A)–(D) as (post-MD – pre-MD)/(pre-MD). †p < 0.05 and ‡p < 0.01, paired t test; ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01, unpaired t test. (G) Individual ODIs (circles) and mean group values (horizontal lines). The gray box presents the mean ± SD of baseline (pre-MD) ODI in Tnf+/+ animals. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05 versus corresponding baseline. (H) Response magnitude in the monocular area to the deprived eye in Tnf+/+ animals (n = 6) and Tnf−/− animals (n = 6). Values present mean changes (±SEM) from the baseline in response magnitude in the monocular area. ∗∗p < 0.01 compared to baseline (repeated-measure ANOVA), ‡p < 0.01 between groups (t test). Error bars show SEM. Neuron 2008 58, 673-680DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.023) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions