Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Advertisements

High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
The Protonation State of the Glu-71/Asp-80 Residues in the KcsA Potassium Channel: A First-Principles QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Study  Denis Bucher, Leonardo.
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure and Dynamics of Calmodulin in Solution
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on SDF-1α: Binding with CXCR4 Receptor
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Molecular Packing and Packing Defects in Helical Membrane Proteins
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Sukanya Sasmal, James Lincoff, Teresa Head-Gordon  Biophysical Journal 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
The Unbinding of ATP from F1-ATPase
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Wild-Type and Mutant Forms of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MscL Channel  Donald E. Elmore, Dennis A. Dougherty  Biophysical.
Investigating Lipid Composition Effects on the Mechanosensitive Channel of Large Conductance (MscL) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Donald E. Elmore,
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Hydrogen Bonding in Helical Polypeptides from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Amide Hydrogen Exchange Analysis: Alamethicin and Melittin in Methanol 
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Lipid Bilayer Pressure Profiles and Mechanosensitive Channel Gating
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein FhuA: A Comparative Study of the Ferrichrome-Free and Bound States  José D. Faraldo-Gómez,
Dielectric Properties of Proteins from Simulation: The Effects of Solvent, Ligands, pH, and Temperature  Jed W. Pitera, Michael Falta, Wilfred F. van.
Alice Qinhua Zhou, Diego Caballero, Corey S. O’Hern, Lynne Regan 
An Atomic Model of the Tropomyosin Cable on F-actin
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Julian Gough, Cyrus Chothia  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Yang Zhang, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 1126-1144 (March 2000) Backbone Dipoles Generate Positive Potentials in all Proteins: Origins and Implications of the Effect  M.R. Gunner, Mohammad A. Saleh, Elizabeth Cross, Asif ud-Doula, Michael Wise  Biophysical Journal  Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 1126-1144 (March 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9 Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Space filling representation of an amide group. The amine HN (r=1.0Å) is substantially smaller than the carbonyl oxygen (r=1.6Å). The first atom of the two side chains (CB) adjacent to the amide are oriented as they would be in an α-helix. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Each non-terminal side chain lies between 2 amides, one toward the N-terminal and the other toward the C-terminal. (A) The amides toward the N-terminal (amide(n)) and C-terminal (amide(c)) of the side chain of residue i. (B) One amide is amide(c) for one side chain (i) and is amide(n) for the next side chain (i+1) in the protein. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Electrostatic potential at a slice through four proteins with different folds. Potentials calculated and displayed with the program grasp (Nicholls et al., 1991). Blue regions are at positive and red at negative potential; charmm charges, ϵprotein=4; ϵsolvent=80. (A) α motif: Met-hemerythrin from sipunculid worm (Themiste dyscrita) (2hmq chain A) (Holmes and Stenkamp, 1991). A 104 residue iron-binding protein in a four-helical up-and-down bundle with a left-handed twist (Motif descriptions from the scop data base (Murzin et al., 1995)). (B) β motif: human lipid binding protein (1hmr) (Zanotti et al., 1992). A 129 residue 10-stranded meander β-sheet folded upon itself. (C) α/β motif: triose phosphate isomerase from Trypanosoma brucie brucei (1tpf) (Kishan et al., 1994); a 247 residue α/β barrel which has 8 alternating α and β segments forming an internal, parallel β-sheet barrel; and (D) α+β motif: bovine ribonuclease A (7rsa) (Wlodawer et al., 1988); A 124 residue protein with a long curved β-sheet and 3 α-helices. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The number of proteins with different values of the average electrostatic potential at the side chain heavy atoms (VP). VP was calculated with Eq. 3a for 305 proteins. The patterns for different scop protein motifs: α, black; β, horizontal; α+β, diagonal; α/β, cross-hatch; others, white. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of the average potential at side chain heavy atoms (VP) for proteins with different charges on the backbone. VP was calculated with Eq. 3a. Charges from Table 1: (○), amine (HN, N, CA) charges; (●), carbonyl (C, O) charges. The straight lines are described by: 11.91+0.77x (r2=0.96) and −11.2+0.22x (r2=0.71) Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of the contribution of the neighbor and distal amides to the average potential for 51 proteins. Each residue is charged in turn in each protein and the potential collected at the two neighboring side chains and at the distal side chains. Different protein motifs: α, ■; β, □; α+β, ▴; α/β, ○; others, △. The straight lines are described by neighboring amides, 86.91+0.18x (r2=0.56); and distal amides, −86.9+0.82x (r2=0.96) Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Each amide forms the junction between two residues (Fig. 2 B). One amide is amide(c) for residue (i), with an orientation between side chain and amide determined by the psi angle. The same amide is amide(n) for the next side chain (i+1) and their orientation is described by the phi angle. grasp (Nicholls et al., 1991) pictures showing the two CBs (green) neighboring one amide in (A) α-helix (ϕ=−52, ψ=−53); (B) β-strand (ϕ=−123, ψ=143). The five atoms assigned charge are labeled, colored red (negative) or blue (positive), and given a radius that is proportional to the partial charge. The isopotential contours at +0.85kcal/e (blue) and −0.85kcal/e (red) calculated with (C, D) ϵpeptide=ϵsolv=4; and (E, F) ϵpeptide=4, ϵsolv=80. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The potential at the middle CB in an Ala tripeptide from (A) amide(n) as a function of the phi angle and (B) amide(c) as a function of the psi angle (see Fig. 7 A). The potential was calculated with (bold line) ϵpeptide=ϵsolv=4; (flatter, light line) ϵpeptide=4, ϵsolv=80. The relative occurrence of residues with different phi (C) and psi (D) angles in the 305 proteins considered in this study were determined with the program dssp (Kabsch and Sander, 1983): Solid line, α-helix; heavy dotted line, β-sheet; light line, other. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The dependence of the average potential at the side chain (VS) on the length of the side chain. The average potential (VS), ●; the contribution from the neighboring amides, △; the contribution of the distal amides, ■. Data from Table 8. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 The difference in the exposure of the HN and O vs. the contribution of that amide to the average potential within the four-helix bundle 2hmq, the β-barrel 1hmr, the α/β barrel 1tpf, and the α+β protein 7rsa. Residues in α-helices (■), in β-sheets (▴), and in loops (○). The structures were modified as described in the Methods section to equalize the length and size of the HN-N and C-O dipoles. The potential was calculated with ϵprotein=4, ϵsolv=80. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 The distribution of acidic and basic side chains with different values of ΔGrxn and ΔGbkn in 305 proteins with different motifs. charmm charges were used for side chains and amides. The net charges in each run were +1 on the bases or −1 on the acids. ϵprotein=4, ϵsolv=80. Acids: ●, Asp; ○, Glu. Bases: ■, Arg; □, Lys. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 The relationship between ΔGbkn and ΔGrxn for the acidic and basic amino acids in 305 proteins. The bold line is for −ΔGbkn=ΔGrxn. The dashed line shows the maximum value for ΔGxn, when Grxn=0 and ΔGrxn=−Grxn in soln (Table 2). The ±1.5kcal/mol has been removed. Biophysical Journal 2000 78, 1126-1144DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76671-9) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions