Parts of a Judging Contest

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Judging Contests 101 Running a Successful 4-H Judging Contest Kevin Kline, PhD University of Illinois.
Advertisements

Cattle By: Kristi Hart Livestock Evaluation. Objectives Identify ideal structure, soundness, finish. Describe an ideal market steer.
Beth Morrison Youth participation in judging will provide multiple benefits in addition to the skills learned in the project area.
Market Steers A. Feedlot Steers Class #1 Evaluated by: Celina Johnson Placing: Cuts: I placed this class of feedlot steers In the.
Judging Market Steers Principals of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Made By: Michael Baca Edited By: Charolette Atkinson.
Scoring of Contests Kathy M. Gordon Extension Educator, 4-H & Youth Carroll County “Maryland Cooperative Extension Provides Equal Access Programs”
+ Market Swine & Grades of Swine Megan Kay. + Objectives Identify swine classes. Define swine grades. List characteristics of ideal swine.
MARKET HOGS By: Kiona Elkins—Blue Mtn. Community College.
Livestock Judging: Reasons are Not All the Same. Credits The presentation was created by Drew Obermeyer, K- State Agricultural Education Student as partial.
Note Taking and Preparation for Oral Reasons Equine Science Spring 2010 Created by: Bryan Egan and Stacie Domer Penn State, 2006.
Developed by: Richard Coffey, Extension Swine Specialist, University of Kentucky Kevin Laurent, Extension Associate, University of Kentucky Warren Beeler,
Judging Meat Goats Principals of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Made By: Mr. Michael Baca Edited By: Charolette Atkinson.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009.
2014 Mail-in Tournament Month 2: Swine.  Make sure you have a pencil and judging card ready o Don’t forget to include your full name!  You may take.
Giving Oral Reasons In Livestock Judging Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Extension Agent
Livestock Jay Hale.  Objectives:  1. To understand and to interpret the value of performance data based on industry standards.  2. To measure the students’
Utah State 4-H Leadermete Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Extension Agent
Ag Fact! 4/23.
1. What are the guides to meat quality? (V-155). 1. What are the guides to meat quality? Government grades and manufacturer or retailer brands are guides.
F30 Beef Cattle Evaluation Some of the pictures and text contained in this material have copyright restrictions limiting their use. Use of this information.
Claire Sponseller Morrow County 4-H Agent. Evaluating (comparing) an animal against a common standard (ideal) Four steps Information Observation Comparison.
KIPP BROWN Extension Livestock Coordinator Department of Animal and Dairy Science Mississippi State University.
Objective: Define cutability, degree of lean, marbling, and quality features used to market beef and swine.
Livestock Evaluation. I. Bovine A. Breeding Heifers 1. Structural Correctness a. Most important factor b. Skeletal factors c. Watch the stride of the.
Note Taking and Reasons Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Grading Slaughter Cattle. Quality Grades: Prime (highest) Choice (most desirable today) Select (good) Standard Determined by the amount of fat.
Sheep. Labeling the Parts Top of Shoulder Lower leg Hock Fore-rib Flank Point of shoulder Chest floor Fore-arm Knee Pastern Dock Leg Muzzle Neck Rack.
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
Cattle.
Livestock Evaluation Market Lamb class
Hog Evaluation. PARTS Crest Blade Forearm Knee Pastern Dewclaw Sheath Flank Hock HipLoin Top Ham Elbow Pock et Stifle x Ham-Loin Junction Cannon Jaw line/Jowl.
Beth Morrison Youth participation in judging will provide multiple benefits in addition to the skills learned in the project area.
Livestock Evaluation.
Youth Livestock Specialist
A Tender, Juicy Ribeye….. Cattle Evaluation AGSC 336 – Advanced Animal Science Presented by Mrs. Tusa.
Judging Market Steers Developed by: Richard Coffey, Extension Swine Specialist, University of Kentucky Kevin Laurent, Extension Associate, University of.
Livestock Judging.
Poultry Improvement Project Conformation and Fleshing.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep
Livestock Judging CDE Market Steers
Livestock Evaluation And Selection
Market Steers A.
Market Steers Livestock Judging.
Sharpen Your Livestock Evaluation
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Better Oral Reasons Getting Started.
FFA Cattle Judging.
Live Animal Evaluation Beef
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Poultry Judging: Past Production, Egg Quality, Ready-to-Cook Poultry
Livestock Evaluation This is a presentation from Virginia Tech and has not been edited by the Georgia Curriculum Office.
Livestock Judging Helpful Hints Beef cattle Swine Sheep.
Judging Contests 101 Running a Successful 4-H Judging Contest
The Exam 40% of your grade Marked out of 80
Introduction to Livestock Judging & Selection
Sheep Evaluation.
JUDGING 1-2 yr old Colts.
Livestock Judging: Reasons are Not All the Same
Scoring Judging Placings
Better Oral Reasons Getting Started.
Judging Meat Goats Developed by:
Judging Meat Goats Developed by:
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Evaluating Lambs!.
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Introduction to Reasons
Horse Judging Evaluating Halter Horses Presented by: Katherine Whitby.
Delivering Livestock Judging Reasons
Judging Wholesale and Retail Classes
Presentation transcript:

Parts of a Judging Contest March 23-24, 2010

Comparison to an ideal Understanding of ideal Think in terms of pairs Parts of animal or object Terminology Current industry standards Think in terms of pairs cuts- placing 4-3-2-1 / 4-(3)-3-(5)-2-(3)-1 Don’t over think class- go with obvious first. References will be provided by specialist in the specific contest later this afternoon during sessions that will allow you to assist youth in learning more about the ideals in each contest. Cuts- score provided to each pair which places a point value on the difficulty of placing the pair. The higher the point value the easier and lower point value indicates more difficult placing.

Reasons Be clear, concise, and on point. Identify and talk pairs (top pair, middle pair, and bottom pair). Practice, Practice, Practice!!!

Sample Reasons Placing: 4-3-2-1 Cuts: 3-5-3 I placed this class of feedlot steers 4-3-2-1. In the top pair of steers comparable in finish, I placed 4 over 3 due to his advantage in muscling. Ideally, I would like to see 4 more structurally correct through his shoulder, however, the bald-faced steer shows more shape and natural thickness down his top and through his hip, and stands wider based when viewed from the rear. He should hang a carcass with the highest percent of saleable product in the class. No doubt, 3 is more structurally correct, particularly through the shoulder and deeper bodied. However, he is narrower topped and flatter through the quarter than the class winner, so he is second. It is easily 3 over 2 in the middle pair. He is the nicer balanced steer that better combines yield and quality grade. He is freer of waste through the lower 1/3 of his body and shows more muscle expression down his top and through his quarter. In the bottom pair, it’s 2 over 1 due to his advantage in market readiness. He is carrying more finish over his fore and rear rib and should be safer into the choice grade. I realize that 1 is the leaner. However, he is the least market ready as he runs out of finish over his rear rib. He is also the lightest muscled, narrowest made steer in the class that should hang the least amount of red meat, so he is last.

Rules Copy rules for each contest to be reviewed and provided to contestants prior to contest. Communicate to contestants any dress requirements and other materials needed prior to contest. Explain to contestants that there is a zero tolerance for talking and/or using cell phones or other communication devices during contest.

Rules Explain to contestants that contestants are not allowed to have written material during the contest- BLANK PAPER ONLY for reasons. Mark Judging cards accurately and clearly- if placing is not clear the contestant will receive a zero score. Listen and follow instructions of superintendant/group leaders during contest.