Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Structure of Type IIβ Phosphatidylinositol Phosphate Kinase
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Helicase structures: a new twist on DNA unwinding
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 635-647 (August 1997) Major Domain Swiveling Revealed by the Crystal Structures of Complexes of E. coli Rep Helicase Bound to Single-Stranded DNA and ADP  Sergey Korolev, John Hsieh, George H. Gauss, Timothy M. Lohman, Gabriel Waksman  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 635-647 (August 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5

Figure 1 Active, Rolling Model for DNA Unwinding and Translocation by the Dimeric E. coli Rep DNA Helicase The letter (P) indicates the Rep monomer. The letters (S) and (D) indicate single-stranded DNA and double-stranded DNA, respectively (Wong and Lohman 1992). Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 2 Representative Regions of the Electron Density In (A), (C), and (D), electron density results from a map calculated using MIRAS solvent-flattened phases. In (B), electron density results from a map calculated using |Fo-Fc| coefficients (Fo from the ternary complex data) and phases calculated from the DNA-bound Rep dimer model. Residues in the closed conformer of Rep are indicated with a “prime” label, while the absence of this label indicates residues in the open conformer of Rep. Residues in the protein are color-coded according to atom type with carbon atoms in yellow, oxygen atoms in red, and nitrogen atoms in blue. Only in (D) are the residues of the open conformer of Rep colored in red. ssDNA is in blue, and ADP is in red. (A) Binding site of the 3′ end of the ssDNA molecule. (B) The ADP binding site. (C) Hinge region between 2A and 2B in the open configuration of the Rep monomer. (D) Hinge region between 2A and 2B in the closed configuration of the Rep monomer. Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 3 Stereo Diagram of the Open Conformer of the Rep Protein Secondary structural elements (Kabsch and Sander 1983) are indicated in yellow for strands and red for helices. Intervening regions are shown in light blue. DNA is indicated in dark blue. Strands are labeled from (A) to (M) (black lettering) and helices from (A) to (X) (white lettering), according to Figure 4 (Kraulis 1991; Merritt and Murphy 1994). Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 4 Sequence Alignment of Rep, PcrA (S. aureus), and UvrD Secondary structural elements and domain boundaries are indicated above the aligned sequences, with β strands and α helices indicated by open and closed boxes, respectively. The seven helicase motifs are indicated by colored unframed boxes and labeled accordingly below the aligned sequences. One additional motif found in the DEAD, DEXH, and DEAH families of helicases is indicated in a light green unframed box and is labeled TXGX. Regions of the Rep sequence that form the core ssDNA binding site are in yellow boxes. Residues in bold are those involved in contacts with the ssDNA. Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 5 The Open and Closed Forms of the Rep Monomer Domain 1A is indicated in yellow, 2A in red, and 1B in green. Domain 2B in the open monomer is indicated in dark blue, while it is colored light blue in the closed monomer. In the space-filling models of (D) and (E), DNA is indicated in pink. (A) Ribbon diagram of the open conformer of Rep. (B) Ribbon diagram of the closed monomer. (C) Superimposition of domains 1A, 1B, and 2A of each monomer. Color coding of domain 2B is as in (A) and (B), while the superimposed domains 1A, 1B, and 2A are in grey. (D) Space-filling model of the open conformer of Rep in the same orientation as in (A). In this conformation, a large cleft between domains 1B and 2B is clearly visible. This orientation of domain 2B relative to the three other domains is arbitrarily defined as the 0° angle orientation of this domain. (E) Space-filling model of the closed conformer of Rep in the same orientation as in (B). In this conformation, domain 2B closes off the large cleft and packs against domains 1B and 1A, thereby obstructing the ssDNA binding groove between these two domains. This orientation of domain 2B relative to the other domains corresponds to a 130° rotation around a hinge region between domains 2A and 2B. This figure was generated using InsightII (Biosym, San Diego, CA). Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 6 DNA Binding Regions of the Rep Monomers (A) The complex of Rep and dT(pT)15 as observed in the asymmetric unit dimer. Color coding of the different Rep subdomains are as in Figure 5. Two conformations of the Rep monomer are observed, that corresponding to an open configuration of a cleft formed by the four subdomains, and another corresponding to a closed configuration of the cleft. The open and closed conformers of Rep are indicated. The bound ssDNA is indicated in purple and is seen bridging the two conformers of Rep. (B) The ssDNA binding core of Rep and the ADP binding site. Residues involved in binding ssDNA are indicated in yellow. Residues involved in binding ADP are indicated in gold. ssDNA is indicated in purple, and ADP is indicated in green. Motif II is indicated in dark blue. (C) Reference figure indicating the seven helicase motifs and the TXGX motif. Color coding is that of Figure 4. (D) Close-up view of the ssDNA and ADP binding regions of (B). Color coding is as in (B). Residues involved in binding are indicated (Kraulis 1991; Merritt and Murphy 1994). Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 7 Schematic Diagram of the Contacts of ssDNA with the Rep Monomers Hydrogen bonding interactions are indicated by arrows. Aromatic residues making stacking interactions with the bases are indicated in bold. Residues in the closed conformer of Rep are indicated with a prime label, while the absence of this label indicates residues in the open conformer of Rep. Shaded boxes indicate residues in both conformers making identical contacts with DNA, i.e., between bases 1 and 5 for the open conformer of Rep and between bases 12 and 16 in the closed conformer of Rep. Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)

Figure 8 A Possible Configuration of the Functional Rep Dimer (A) The 2B-mediated Rep dimer generated by using the open Rep conformer of the asymmetric unit (indicated as open) and a symmetry-related swiveled Rep monomer (indicated as closed). The two potential hinge regions in the dimer are indicated as hinge 1 in the closed conformer and hinge 2 in the open conformer. (B) Relative movements of the two DNA binding sites within the domain 2B–mediated dimer due to rotation of domain 2B of the closed form by 130° about hinge 1. This rotation results in a large motion of the ssDNA binding site of the open conformer by 75 Å. Color coding of the fixed domains and that of the moving 2B domains are as in Figure 5. The monomer affected by the motion is indicated in gray (InsightII, Biosym, San Diego, CA). Cell 1997 90, 635-647DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80525-5)