Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Michael A. Geeves, Sherwin S. Lehrer  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Maik Goette, Martin C. Stumpe, Ralf Ficner, Helmut Grubmüller 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Stephen R. Norris, Marcos F. Núñez, Kristen J. Verhey 
Adam G. Larson, Nariman Naber, Roger Cooke, Edward Pate, Sarah E. Rice 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Daniel M. Freed, Peter S. Horanyi, Michael C. Wiener, David S. Cafiso 
Structure of the Dual-Mode Wnt Regulator Kremen1 and Insight into Ternary Complex Formation with LRP6 and Dickkopf  Matthias Zebisch, Verity A. Jackson,
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C.
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Structural and Dynamic Properties of the Human Prion Protein
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Analysis of the Oxidative Damage-Induced Conformational Changes of Apo- and Holocalmodulin by Dose-Dependent Protein Oxidative Surface Mapping  Joshua.
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Andrew E. Blanchard, Mark J. Arcario, Klaus Schulten, Emad Tajkhorshid 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Channeling of cAMP in PDE-PKA Complexes Promotes Signal Adaptation
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Site-Directed Spin-Labeling Study of the Light-Harvesting Complex CP29
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages (April 2018)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Cooperative Nucleotide Binding in Hsp90 and Its Regulation by Aha1
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Xiaodong Pang, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Biophysical Journal 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Thomas Kampourakis, Yin-Biao Sun, Malcolm Irving  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages 806-815 (August 2015) Protein Conformational Changes Are Detected and Resolved Site Specifically by Second-Harmonic Generation  Ben Moree, Katelyn Connell, Richard B. Mortensen, C. Tony Liu, Stephen J. Benkovic, Joshua Salafsky  Biophysical Journal  Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages 806-815 (August 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic of the SHG experiment. Incident laser light strikes the surface and through total internal reflection creates an evanescent wave. Labeled protein is bound to the surface and the measured SHG signal magnitude depends on the average, net orientation of the dye label relative to the surface normal (z axis). A conformational change that alters the orientational distribution of the label in space or time results in a signal change. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 806-815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CaM. (A–C) Representative SHG time courses for addition of calcium and CBP to CaM. Arrows denote the time of addition of the indicated compounds. (D) Summary of the percent change in SHG signal observed after addition of calcium and CBP at a 2-min endpoint (N ≥ 3). (E) Crystal structures of free CaM (red; PDB ID: 1CFD), Ca-bound CaM (orange; PDB ID: 1CLL), and Ca/CBP-bound CaM (yellow; PDB ID: 1CDL) are shown with the labeled lysine residues identified by MS in green. Calcium ions are shown in blue and CBP is in purple. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 806-815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MBP. (A) Representative time course of an SHG signal during compound addition to MBP labeled at pH 8.3. The arrows denote the time of injection of buffer, lactose, and maltose. (B) Representative time course of an SHG signal during compound addition to MBP labeled at pH 7.5. The arrows denote the time of injection of buffer and maltose. (C) Summary of the percent change in SHG signal observed after addition of buffer, lactose, and maltose to MBP at a 2-min endpoint (N ≥ 3). (D) Overlay of the crystal structures of MBP with maltose (blue; PDB ID: 1ANF) and without maltose (tan; PDB ID: 1JW4) bound. Maltose is shown in blue. Modified lysine residues identified by MS are shown as sticks in green on the unbound structure and in purple on the bound structure. The labeled lysines are in different conformations in the two crystal structures. For this comparison, the structures were aligned at their N-terminal domains. The His-tag and thus the site of immobilization of the protein are at the N-terminus. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 806-815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Amine-labeled DHFR. (A) Representative kinetic trace for MTX addition to lysine-labeled DHFR. Arrows denote the time of addition of buffer and MTX. (B) Representative kinetic trace for a TMP-MTX competition experiment with lysine-labeled DHFR. Arrows denote the time of addition of buffer, TMP, and MTX. (C) Summary of percent change of SHG signal observed after addition of buffer, MTX, and TMP to lysine-labeled DHFR at a 2-min endpoint (N ≥ 4). (D) Crystal structures of DHFR holoenzyme with (blue; PDB ID: 1RB3) and without (tan; PDB ID: 1RX1) MTX bound. Labeled residues identified by MS are shown as sticks in green for DHFR without MTX, and in purple for DHFR bound to MTX. MTX is represented in blue. NADPH (100 μM) was present in all experiments. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 806-815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cysteine-labeled DHFR. (A) Representative time course for MTX addition to cysteine-labeled DHFR. (B) Representative kinetic trace for a TMP-MTX competition experiment with cysteine-labeled DHFR. Arrows denote the time of addition of buffer, TMP, and MTX. (C) Summary of the percent change of SHG signal observed after addition of buffer, DHF, MTX, and TMP to cysteine-labeled DHFR at a 2-min endpoint (N ≥ 3). (D) Crystal structures of DHFR holoenzyme with MTX (blue; PDB ID: 1RB3) and without MTX (tan; PDB ID: 1RX1) bound. Residue M20 is shown in purple and green sticks for the bound and unbound forms, respectively. MTX is represented in blue. NADPH (100 μM) was present in all experiments. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 806-815DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions