Agenda Item 3d Ad-hoc Task Group (ATG) Hydromorphology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu 8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network AGRICULTURE Strategic Co-ordination Group Brussels, 11 November 2010 Nicolas Rouyer & Ville Keskisarja.
Advertisements

HMWB-Workshop „Heavily Modified Water Bodies: Information Exchange on Designation, Assessment of Ecological Potential, Objective Setting and Measures”
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
1 IUCN GL GLPA Standard Framework Matthew Wenban-Smith (Technical Support to Green List PA Steering Group) 25 th February 2014.
Implementation of the 2009 work programme of the
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
Chemical Monitoring mandate
ATG ON HYDROMORPHOLOGY
GEP vs. GES.
CIS General progress report WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Proposed CIS Workshop on WFD Economic Issues
CIS work programme Ad-hoc activity on Economics
Informal meeting of EU Water Directors
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
CIRCA Accessibility Strategic Coordination Group,
Water Directors’ Meeting Common Implementation Strategy
WG ECOSTAT: Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Progress report ATG Hymo 1 May – 20 October 2016
CIS Acitivity Climate Change and Water
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Johan Kling, Proposal for improved coordination of hydromorphology within CIS structure proposal by SE, NO, EE, IT Johan Kling,
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Natural water Retention Measures
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy  Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
The Common Implementation Strategy – an overview
Working group Ecological Flows
WG GES: Decision review progress
Draft mandate on Climate Change and EU water policy
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
8-c) Expert Group & River Basin Network on WFD & Agriculture
Introduction Prep-SCG meeting 13 Sept 2013.
Workshop on Biodiversity and Water
Water – and Marine Directors’ meeting
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
EU Water Framework Directive
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
MAIN COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT MANDATE
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
CIS Acitivity Env Objectives and Exemptions
Ad-hoc Activity: Biodiversity and Water Progress Report
CIS work programme Supporting the implementation of the first river basin management plans Water Directors' Meeting 30 November and 1 December.
Update WG Eflows activity and link with EcoStat
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
CIS Work Programme Initial suggestions from WG F
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
HMWB-Workshop „Heavily Modified Water Bodies: Information Exchange on Designation, Assessment of Ecological Potential, Objective Setting and Measures”
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Activity on Eutrophication
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Common Implementation Strategy for the
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Planning to develop the CIS Work Programme
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
Ad-hoc Task Group on Hydromorphology
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Strategic discussion on the future role of WG GES WG GES, 5-6 March 2013 European Commission, DG Environment, Marine.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Item 3d Ad-hoc Task Group (ATG) Hydromorphology Meeting of the Strategic Coordination Group 8-9 November 2017

HYMO deliverables within the ECOSTAT Work Programme Ongoing work inter alia on Elaboration of report on hydromorphological assessment methodologies Inter-comparison of "Good Ecological Potential" Ongoing work on elaboration of reports on "Common understanding of using mitigation measures for different uses" Feeding into elaboration of Appendix to CIS Guidance Document No. 4 (main deliverable) (for more details see ECOSTAT Progress Report)

GEP ongoing work: Reports on "Common understanding of using mitigation measures for different uses" Water storage Floods Agricultural drainage Inland navigation Coastal and transitional waters Feeding into elaboration of Appendix to CIS Guidance Document No. 4

Policy oriented HYMO issues ToR Ad-hoc Task Group (ATG) Hydromorphology: ATG Hydromorphology to organise workshops and/or discussions with the SCG in preparations Topic of "significant adverse effects on use, wider environment" as one of the policy related issues Relevant in the context of HMWB designation and ongoing work on Good Ecological Potential Plan to organise workshop on that subject on 22-23 February 2018, Brussels Results planned to feed into elaboration of Appendix to CIS Guidance Document No. 4

Planned workshop on significant adverse effects on use, wider environment Potential issues to be addressed at workshop: What are the main uses leading to HMWB designation? What are the related benefits of these different uses? Why do countries designate as HMWB and for which uses? Why don't countries designate as HMWB and for which uses? How do countries distinguish between "adverse effect on the use" and "significant adverse effect on the use"? Which criteria are used to determine "significant adverse effect on use"? At what scale? How is HMWB designated and GEP determined in case no specific criteria on "significant adverse effect on the use" are in place?

Planned workshop on significant adverse effects on use, wider environment Questions to SCG: Do you see this first draft outline of questions as relevant? Which additional issues do you consider as relevant to be addressed at the workshop? Can you already indicate a commitment for the provision of input at the workshop, e.g. in form of a presentation on a specific issue / approach in your country on the subject? Are there any further issues/ideas which you would like to raise in relation to the planned workshop? Discussions and feedback provided at SCG meeting will help in the preparation of the workshop

Nomination of additional co-lead for the ATG on Hydromorphology Particular support from Sweden for activities of ATG on Hydromorphology (e.g. on report for mitigation measures agricultural drainage) Sweden informed about aiming to ensure continuous support for ongoing activities Flagged interest to nominate Ms. Katarina Vartia from Sweden as additional co-lead for the ATG on Hydromorphology (next to IT, NO and COM)

SCG invited to Take note of the activities on HYMO issues within the ECOSTAT Work Programme (see Agenda Item 3g) Agree to the nomination of Ms. Katarina Vartia from Sweden as an additional co-lead of the ATG on Hydromorphology Discuss ideas and issues to be addressed at the planned policy-related workshop on "Significant adverse effects on use" tentatively scheduled for 22- 23 February 2018