A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Go to next slide.
Advertisements

Framing an Experimental Hypothesis WP5 Professor Alan K. Outram University of Exeter 8 th October 2012.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments In this tutorial you will learn to distinguish deductive arguments from inductive arguments. Go to next slide.
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning.
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Arguments In this tutorial you will learn to distinguish deductive arguments from inductive arguments. Chapter 3.a.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning HW: Lesson 2.4/ 1 – 10, 13.
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Chapter 3.b.
Is there any proof that the Bible is true?
Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Survey of Mathematical Ideas Math 100 Chapter 1 John Rosson Thursday January 18.
Inductive & Deductive Reasoning
MGF 1107 Mathematics of Social Choice Part 1a – Introduction, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
Thinking Mathematically Problem Solving and Critical Thinking.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.
2.1 Conditional Statements Ms. Kelly Fall Standards/Objectives: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Recognize the hypothesis.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning logically from given statements to a conclusion.
Logic & Critical Herman J. SuhendraProduced by Herman J. Suhendra A.B. Gadjah Mada University & M.A. University of Santo Tomas, Manila MEETING.
Entry Task. Using Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Learning Target: Given a true statement I can use deductive reasoning to make valid conclusions.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
p qp q q pq p p  q ~p  ~q ~q  ~p q p September 17, 2014.
© 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved 1-1 Chapter 1 Section 1-1 Types of Reasoning.
Inductive Reasoning Notes 2.1 through 2.4. Definitions Conjecture – An unproven statement based on your observations EXAMPLE: The sum of 2 numbers is.
Do NOW: 1.) Solve 2(x – 15) = 30. Write a justification for each step. 2.) Find the next number in this sequence: 3, 5, 8, … How is the reasoning different.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
EXAMPLE 3 Use inductive and deductive reasoning
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Solving Problems by Inductive Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
M1 Lesson 4.4 January 21, 2009 Deductive Reasoning.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
The Art of Problem Solving
The Ontological Argument
Inductive Vs. Deductive Reasoning
Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—
The Science of Biology.
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Warmup (Short Answer) Go into Socrative App
The Ontological Argument
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Making Sense of Arguments
Logic Problems and Questions
Logic & Reasoning.
The Art of Problem Solving
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Inductive Reasoning.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning The difference: inductive reasoning uses patterns to arrive at a conclusion (conjecture) deductive reasoning uses facts, rules, definitions or properties to arrive at a conclusion.

Inductive reasoning - Think of it like a We start with specifics and move to generalities Deductive reasoning – think of it like a We start with generalities and move to specifics.

Examples of Inductive Reasoning Some examples Every quiz has been easy. Therefore, the test will be easy. The teacher used PowerPoint in the last few classes. Therefore, the teacher will use PowerPoint tomorrow. Every fall there have been hurricanes in the tropics. Therefore, there will be hurricanes in the tropics this coming fall.

Deductive Reasoning An Example: The catalog states that all entering freshmen must take a mathematics placement test. You are an entering freshman. Conclusion: You will have to take a mathematics placement test.

Inductive or Deductive Reasoning? Geometry example… 60◦ x What is the measure of angle x? Triangle sum property - the sum of the angles of any triangle is always 180 degrees. Therefore, angle x = 30°

Inductive or Deductive Reasoning? Geometry example… What is the next shape in the sequence?

All humans have 2 ears. Joe is human, therefore Joe has two ears. DEDUCTIVE

INDUCTIVE You are a good student. You get all A’s Therefore your friends must get all A’s too INDUCTIVE

DEDUCTIVE All oranges are fruits. All fruits grow on trees Therefore, all oranges grow on trees DEDUCTIVE

Mikhail hails from Russia and Russians are tall, therefore Mikhail is tall INDUCTIVE

Kristin is a law student. Most law students own laptops. So, probably Kristin owns a laptop. The indicator word test asks whether there are any indicator words that provide clues whether a deductive or inductive argument is being offered. Common deduction indicator words include words or phrases like necessarily, logically, it must be the case that, and this proves that. Common induction indicator words include words or phrases like probably, likely, it is plausible to suppose that, it is reasonable to think that, and it's a good bet that. In the example above, the word probably shows that the argument is inductive.   Go to next slide

No Texans are architects. No architects are Democrats. So, no Texans are Democrats. The strict necessity test asks whether the conclusion follows from the premises with strict logical necessity. If it does, then the argument is deductive.   In this example, the conclusion does follow from the premises with strict logical necessity. Although the premises are both false, the conclusion does follow logically from the premises, because if the premises were true, then the conclusion would be true as well. Go to next slide

Either Kurt voted in the last election, or he didn't. Only citizens can vote. Kurt is not, and has never been, a citizen. So, Kurt didn't vote in the last election. The common pattern test asks whether the argument exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is characteristically deductive or inductive. If the argument exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is characteristically deductive, then the argument is probably deductive. If the argument exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is characteristically inductive, then the argument is probably inductive. In the example above, the argument exhibits a pattern of reasoning called "argument by elimination." Arguments by elimination are arguments that seek to logically rule out various possibilities until only a single possibility remains. Arguments of this type are always deductive. Go to next slide

Arnie: Harry told me his grandmother recently climbed Mt. Everest.   Sam: Well, Harry must be pulling your leg. Harry's grandmother is over 90 years old and walks with a cane. In this passage, there are no clear indications whether Sam's argument should be regarded as deductive or inductive. For arguments like these, we fall back on the principle of charity test. According to the principle of charity test, we should always interpret an unclear argument or passage as generously as possible. We could interpret Sam's argument as deductive. But this would be uncharitable, since the conclusion clearly doesn't follow from the premises with strict logical necessity. (It is logically possible--although highly unlikely--that a 90-year-old woman who walks with a cane could climb Mt. Everest.) Thus, the principle of charity test tells us to treat the argument as inductive.   Go to next slide

Guided Questions Inductive vs Deductive reasoning What is deductive reasoning? What is inductive reasoning? What kind of reasoning in the comic? What are the 4 tests you can use to determine if an argument is deductive or inductive? Explain each test and give an example Go to the 2nd powerpoint on January 16th on the website and answer the scenarios with the guided questions into your ISN