CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS
Advertisements

THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE and the Information Society Council of Europe Summit (May 2005), Action Plan on e-democracy: "We will also take initiatives so that.
Strasbourg The Various European Systems of Enforcement Professor of Urals State Law University Vladimir Yarkov (Yekaterinburg) 1.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand Der Europäische Bürgerbeauftragte Ο Ευρωπαίος Διαμεσολαβητής The European Ombudsman Il Mediatore Europeo Le Médiateur Européen.
Case of Serbia: Relations between EU integration process and judiciry reform Dušan Brajković Between Transformation and Integration – South-East Europe’s.
© 2006 Rule of Law and Fair Trial Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria Rule of Law and Fair Trial.
EU Accession to the ECHR The architecture: design and build Tim Jewell Cabinet Office Legal.
Efficiency of Justice and Trust in Justice across Europe: the CEPEJ (Eurojustis, Parma, 7 May 2010) François Paychère WORKING GROUP ON QUALITY OF JUSTICE.
Progress in protecting children‘s rights: challenges and opportunities Ministry of Social Security and Labour Asta Šidlauskienė 3 of desember 2014.
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools. CEPEJ Guidelines.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
EU joining the ECHR New opportunities under two legal systems EQUINET HIGH-LEVEL LEGAL SEMINAR Brussels, 1 – 2 July 2010 Dr. Mario OETHEIMER EU Agency.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe.
INTERVICT International Victimology Institute Tilburg Legal developments in the field of violence against women in Western Europe Renée Römkens UNODC-UNDAW.
Announcements Final Study Guide posted on course web page. Response Question due in Section tomorrow.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Tasks:  analyse the judicial systems in member states  identify the difficulties they meet  define concrete ways to improve the functioning of these.
Dublinbureau Nederland REFORM OF JUDICIARY in Republic of Croatia.
The European Programme for Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP Programme) - Council of Europe -
CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance. Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time.
Conference for LGBT families in Europe Overview of the work of the Council of Europe in the field of family law Sabrina Cajoly - Council of Europe Directorate.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
Data Protection Privacy in the Digital Age: the UN General Assembly Resolution Sophie Kwasny, 16 October th International Conference, Mauritius.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
The judge in the European Judicial Area: Civil and Commercial matters. (9 th edition )
Study Visit of the Jordanian Justice Delegation March 2014, Bologna and Turin, Italy Present and future challenges to the justice administration.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice and evaluation of legal systems (Council of Europe) Dr. Pim Albers Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands.
HUMR5140 Introduction to Human Rights Law Autumn 2014 Lecture 8: Regional Human Rights Systems: Europe.
Corruption, Democracy and justice Pim Albers Special advisor European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)
The new governance focus of the future LIFE Programme ( ) ADAM D NAGY DIRECTORATE D - I MPLEMENTATION, G OVERNANCE & S EMESTER DG ENV.
PROJECT INITIATIVES under the FUND FOR BILATERAL RELATIONS OF PROGRAMME BG 14 “JUDICIAL CAPACITY-BUILDING AND COOPERATION” OF THE NORWEGIAN FINANCIAL MECHANISM.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI F3 European Rural Development Network
1 OSCE ODIHR and international /regional human rights law and related case-law Tina Gewis, Chief of Rule of Law Unit, ODIHR Strasbourg, 20 October 2015.
Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
Council of Europe workshop on the certification of e-voting systems Strasbourg, November 2009.
1 Quality of justice and courts Checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Conseil de l'EuropeUnion européenne Council of EuropeEuropean Union.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Health Technology Assessment Methodology, an EUnetHTA View Basics for the Assessment in EU Countries PharmDr. Martin Visnansky, MBA, PhD., MSc. (HTA) HTA.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
Promoting Equality and Non-Discrimination for Persons with Disabilities ____________________________________________ Report written by Professor Lisa.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
Privacy in the Digital Age: the UN General Assembly Resolution
INTRODUCING INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE ANDEAN STATES
Education for Democracy.
NACJJ Road Map Policy Oriented Meeting:
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Macro-regional strategies Rapporteur: Etele Baráth Dr
Analysis of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in comparison with the Russian legislation Alexander Ermolenko Partner, PhD in Law.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
OSCE ODIHR and international /regional human rights law and related case-law Tina Gewis, Chief of Rule of Law Unit, ODIHR Strasbourg, 20 October 2015.
MEETING OF THE SECRETARIAT
European judicial training
The European Human Rights System
ECtHR-FRA Handbook on European law relating to access to justice
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
European Standards for Equality Bodies An Equinet journey
Democracy in the EU.
The Use of AI in Judicial Systems: Threats and Possible Solutions
Funded by the Justice Programme of the European Union
Conseil de l'Europe Union européenne
Presentation transcript:

CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!

Council of Europe founded in 1949 47 member states engaged for democracy, human rights, rule of law ≠ European Union

Council of Europe European Convention on Human Rights (1953) European Court of Human Rights

Composed of experts from all the 47 member States of the CoE Established on 18. SEP 2002 Composed of experts from all the 47 member States of the CoE Bureau (4 experts) Network of Pilot courts Secretariat Mission to contribute to the improvement of the efficiency and the functioning of justice in all member states. Before the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of Europe was founded in 2002, a working group focused on optimization of use of IT in court-systems. Austria, considered as a pioneer in use of IT in judiciary, was represented by Dr. Martin Schneider then. This group and its members formed one of the nucleus’ of expertise and ideas later organized in CEPEJ.

CEPEJ – Requests Promote better implementation of existing Council of Europe instruments used for the organisation of justice = European standards Ensure that public policies take account of the need of court users Help to reduce the case-load of the European Court of Human Rights by offering states effective solutions to prevent violations of the right to a fair trail within a reasonable time (Art. 6 ECHR) The creation of the CEPEJ demonstrates the will of the Council of Europe to promote the rule of law and fundamental rights in Europe, on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and especially its Articles 5 (Right to liberty and security), 6 (Right to a fair trial), 13 (Right to an effective remedy), 14 (Prohibition of discrimination). Driven by the substantial number of cases at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dealing with overly long proceedings in front of courts in European states, the Council of Europe has initiated a reflection on efficiency of justice and adopted Recommendations which contain ways to ensure both its fairness and efficiency.

CEPEJ – Activities to analyse the results of the judicial systems to identify their difficulties to define concrete ways to improve the evaluation of their results and functioning to provide assistance at request to propose to the competent instances of the Council of Europe the fields where it would be desirable to elaborate a new legal instrument. The creation of the CEPEJ demonstrates the will of the Council of Europe to promote the rule of law and fundamental rights in Europe, on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and especially its Articles 5 (Right to liberty and security), 6 (Right to a fair trial), 13 (Right to an effective remedy), 14 (Prohibition of discrimination). Driven by the substantial number of cases at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) dealing with overly long proceedings in front of courts in European states, the Council of Europe has initiated a reflection on efficiency of justice and adopted Recommendations which contain ways to ensure both its fairness and efficiency.

CEPEJ – Tasks CEPEJ is improving the quality and efficiency of the European judicial systems strengthening the court users’s trust and confidence

CEPEJ – Tasks CEPEJ is not a monitoring or follow-up body of the results of the judicial systems of the member States, nor an institution which is competent to elaborate new binding legal instruments.

Develops concrete and pragmatic  management tools,  best practice and  guidelines aimed at policy makers and judicial practitioners

Analyses the functioning of judicial systems  Report on European Judicial systems

Have a better knowledge of judicial timeframes and optimize judicial time management  SATURN Guidelines  Judicial time management CL  Compendium of best practices  Studies

Promote the quality of the public service of justice  Checklist for promoting the quality of Justice  Handbook for conducting satisfaction surveys  Studies  Other useful material

Facilitate the implementation of European standards  Guidelines for the better implementation of the existing Council of Europe’s Recommendation - on enforcement - on mediation

Provide assistance to member states (at their request), e. g Provide assistance to member states (at their request), e.g.  Court management (judicial time management)  Introduction of e-justice  Reform of judicial system

Get the users closer to their justice system  European Day of Justice  Prize “The Crystal Scales of Justice”