Introduction to Archival Research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How can you think like a Historian?
Advertisements

Engaging Students in History: Analyzing Sources and Writing Historic Arguments.
Understanding the Rubrics
Historical Thinking Skills
POINT OF VIEW IN HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION & ANALYSIS October 16, 2013.
Purpose: To understand words and vocabulary use
Important Tips to writing a History Paper. Getting Started At first glance, writing about history can seem like an overwhelming task. History’s subject.
APUSH ‘themes’ (B.A.G.P.I.P.E.)
Historical Thinking Skills
Historical Thinking Skills
Text Features Text features help you locate important information in a text. Knowing the purpose of the text feature helps you decide at which text feature.
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
HISTORICAL THINKING A lesson on WHY and HOW we study history.
Historical Thinking Skills. Skill Type I: Chronological Reasoning Skill 1: Historical Causation Historical thinking involves the ability to identify,
Successful Strategies for Pre-AP Social Studies Essay Writing.
HISTORY Alicbusan.DePano.Fermo KASPIL1 Report Franco.Ordinario.Salvadora.Tiolengco.
20 th Century History Essay Writing guide. Structure Format is similar to an English essay - Introduction - Body Paragraphs Offer Historical evidence.
AP European DBQ Writing
How To Analyze a Reading Presented By: Dr. Akassi Content From The Norton’s Field Guide To Writing.
 The DBQ requires the construction of a reasoned essay that melds analysis of the documents to specific knowledge of the time period being covered. 
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
HISTORICAL THINKING SKILLS. HISTORICAL CAUSATION COMPARE MULTIPLE CAUSES AND EFFECTS – LONG AND SHORT TERM DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COINCIDENCE, CAUSATION,
Writing an Essay. Reading a Primary Source: Step 1 Who wrote this document? In the first place, you need to know how this document came to be created.
Historical Thinking Skills and Themes in American History
6 Key Concepts of History  Concept #1  CHANGE: Investigating the extent to which people and events bring about change. Examining a situation before and.
Critical Approaches to Literature
Literary Criticism and Literary Theory
Truly a Document Driven Essay
Historical Thinking Skills
Writing the Long Essay Question
Historical Thinking Skills
Problem-Based History
Conducting Historical Investigations
Literature Reviews Are critical evaluations of material that has already been published. By organizing, integrating, and evaluating previously published.
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Historical Research Assessment
AP European History Mr. Vincent Spina
Long Essay Question (LEQ)
Unpacking Assessment Criteria
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
AP World History Riverside High School Mr. Sakole
HOW DO HISTORIANS STUDY HISTORY?
Thinking Like an Historian
The best historians:.
Writing the Persuasive/Argumentative Essay
Wait, Why Are We Doing This
AP EURO LONG ESSAY Question will fall into one of the following Historical Thinking Skills from AP Curriculum Historical Causation Continuity and Change.
Historical Thinking Skills
Truly a Document Driven Essay
DBQ Training and Review (Chapters 15, 16, 17)
How can you think like a Historian?
Historical thinking skills
Section 1 – Identification and Evaluation of Sources
Primary and Secondary Sources
The APUSH Exam will measure student proficiency in 9 historical thinking skills as well as 7 thematic learning objectives. Beginning with the May 2015.
Identify, analyze, evaluate, recognize, describe, compare, explain, make, construct... Foundations of U.S. History and the Historical Thinking Skills.
The LEq AP World History
Historical Thinking Skills
RESEARCH BASICS What is research?.
Continuity and Change Over Time Essay
Warm Up: Define As Many of these as possible!!!
AP World History Exam The Long Essay.
Historical Thinking Skills
Primary Document Analysis
Continuity and Change Over Time Essay
APWH Essay Writing.
Agenda 1. You will need your Chapter 1 Outline and something to write with. Reminder: You have a Vocabulary Quiz.
Agenda 1. You will need your Chapter 1 Outline and something to write with. Reminder: You have a Vocabulary Quiz.
9th Literature EOC Review
Thinking Like a Historian
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Archival Research English 102 Kimberly Turner

Why should you conduct historical research? Historical research tells us about where we came from Historical research tells us how we came to be Historical research gives us a look at the root of modern ideas, institutions, ideas, values, etc. Historical research helps us look at the word through different eyes

What are your goals as a historical researcher? Historical researchers DO NOT simply to collect facts about the past Historical researchers examine and investigate ideas/realities that shaped the lives of people in earlier societies

What will you do as a historical researcher? Ask historical questions! Examine primary sources! Interpret the past!

What are the skills you will use as a historical researcher? Dr. Carroll Van West, TN State Historian Logo for the Society of Appalachian Historians

Use historical evidence Ask the basic questions: Who created the document? Who was the intended audience? For what purpose was the document created? What kind of language does the author use? Also ask yourself: Is my evidence relevant to my topic? Is my evidence sufficient? What inferences (generalizations) can I reasonably draw from this kind of evidence?

Comparison Comparing sources helps historical researchers get to the bottom of “what happened” Would you believe me if I told you the Civil War never actually happened? What if you began researching and a noted 19th century American scholar agreed with me? Considering multiple perspectives about the same event can give historical researchers important glimpses into issues of gender, class, race, religion, etc. If you found an interview with a surviving 3rd class passenger of the Titanic, how do you think it would differ from a surviving first class passenger?

Contextualization You must consider the context in which an event occurred. Historical researchers don’t think about events in isolation  They try to think about people/events in terms of the unique historical contexts which shaped them Contextual questions include: What role did political issues play in the event? What contemporary theories influenced the text? What was the impact (social, political, religious, intellectual, etc.) of the event?

Causation Historical events almost never have one simple cause. Historical researchers are careful to avoid pinpointing simple cause-and-effect relationships as explanations for events. Don’t confuse causation with CORRELATION. What is correlation? When two or more events happen at the same time Ex. 1066 – comet can be seen all throughout Europe AND William of Normandy invaded England Did the comet cause William to invade? Probably not.

Continuity and change over time Continuity – the thing that stays the same over time Historical researchers are interested in the relationship between continuity and change Example: How did the Black Death impact the economic and legal status of European peasants? You would examine: 1) the changes brought about by the bubonic plague 2) the ongoing institution of serfdom

Interpretation Historical sources must be interpreted in order to tell us something about the past. Sometimes historians use different focuses to examine a document or text guided by their own interests. Feminist historians Economic historians Social historians Etc. Think about what approach a historical researcher uses as you evaluate his/her work.

Periodization Periodization – the organization of the past into segments that share similar characteristics Can you think of some examples of how we do this? Considering your research focus, you might think of a period of time and identify a “turning point” that is different than another historian with a different focus in mind. Let’s think of an example.

argumentation Writing about history is simply writing about the facts of “what happened.” Historical researchers evaluate and interpret the evidence of their sources. THEN, they construct arguments supporting the conclusions they have reached about the meaning/significance of that evidence. Your job as a historical researcher: You will critically evaluate the arguments authors make in your secondary sources. You will construct an argument in support of a thesis based on the evidence of your sources.

Synthesis Synthesis – analyzing and evaluating multiple sources, examining their relationships to each other, and developing a new perspective on the topic you’re exploring To write a research paper: Identify relevant primary and secondary sources Evaluate usefulness of the sources Consider sources that offer conflicting information/points of view Synthesize the information they contain Develop a thesis that reflects your conclusion

Here’s a Helpful hint! Let’s take a look at box 6.1 (pg. 149) The 5 C’s of Thinking Like a Historian Change over Time Context Causality Contingency Complexity

Everything is Rhetorical Nothing was or is written or created in a vacuum; our job as teachers/researchers working with primary texts is model how to Discover what those texts mean in their original contexts And then trace the resonances, consequences, and new iterations of meaning as those texts are reinterpreted.

Ask the Rhetorical Basics What is the text/object/phenomenon in question? When was it written/created? Who wrote it or created it? For whom was it written or created (intended audience)? Who, as far as you can tell, was the actual audience? Why was it written or created (intended purpose)? What were the text’s or phenomenon’s actual consequences? What larger historical, cultural, or social practice or movement might the text/phenomenon be a part of?

Diachronic or Synchronic Analysis? Diachronic: looking at the same or similar texts in multiple points in time, or comparing two periods or eras. This is rhetorical analysis over time. Synchronic: looking at a single or cluster of similar texts as they exist at one point in time, looking deeply into how and what meaning is created in that time and place. This is a rhetorical analysis that creates a profile of significance of the text in one time or place. See pp. 194-5 in RoI for sample questions and ideas.

Let’s Look at a Primary Source! UTK football program, 1944

Let’s Look at a Primary Source!

Let’s compare! UTK football program, 1974

Let’s compare!

Help from Secondary Sources Secondary sources are useful to help interpret place and time Be aware that those secondary sources are also rhetorical and subject to influence. Don’t forget to ask your own questions.

In Sum, For Student or Professionals… Decide on a question – an item, a phenomenon, a text to investigate. Ask the rhetorical basics to help establish groundwork. As you are asking these questions, decide which kind of analysis you want to do, diachronic or synchronic. Use secondary sources to help you interpret what you find, but don’t rely on them exclusively. Ask your own questions, too, and be sure analysis is contextually grounded.