Gynecologic Cancer Committee Clinical Trial Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paula M. Jacobs, Ph.D. SAIC Frederick Cancer Imaging Program/DCTD/NCI/NIH September 5, 2006 Phase 0 Trials in Oncologic Drug Development DCTD Phase 0 Workshop.
Advertisements

1 NCORP Overview November 2013 NCORP Director Worta McCaskill-Stevens, MD, MS Chief, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group Division of.
Role of the Statistician and the Bioinformatics Scientist in Cancer Clinical Trials Larry Rubinstein, PhD Biometric Research Branch, NCI International.
Guideline for Monitoring of Clinical Trials for Cooperative Groups, CCOP Research Bases, and the Clinical Trials Support Unit (CTSU) Lore Lagrone Program.
What they never taught me about being a clinician investigator.
 The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is:  The largest of the Institutes that constitute the National Institutes of Health  The largest sponsor of research.
Todays Clinical Trials. Tomorrow’s Cures. Robert L. Comis, MD 1 National Coalition for Cancer Research “Cancer 101” Congressional Briefing 09/10/14.
Tracking Protocol Development Timelines Steve Friedman, MHSA Chief, Clinical Trials Operations and Informatics Branch.
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
TYPE 2 TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH 2009 GRANT PROGRAMS UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Community-Academic Partnership Core (CAP)
ACRIN Abdominal Committee ACRIN Gynecologic Committee Fall Meeting 2010 Susanna I Lee, MD, PhD, Chair Massachusetts General Hospital.
Caveats We are interpreting the guidelines along with you We may have some limited additional insight due to participation during the course of planning.
Annual Meeting 2011 Clinical Trial Development Clinical Trial Development: OEWG, RA’s Role, and Activating Trials on Deadline Martha Heckel Protocol Associate.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
1 Targeted Strategies to Improve Physician and Patient Access to Cancer Clinical Research An Overview of Coalition Programs and Services Ruth Lambersky.
CTEP IND LOI Review and Approval Process. Study Proposals Letter of Intent May be sent in response to solicitation May be sent by investigator with interesting.
Partnering with Federal Labs: A Panel Discussion FLC Mid-Atlantic Region Annual Meeting October 24, 2007.
2011 ACRIN Annual Meeting The ACRIN Accrual Project at University of Washington Constance Lehman, MD. PhD David Mankoff, MD. PhD Tiffany Wong, MS.
CTEP Protocol and Information Office (PIO) Overview.
Research: Intramural and Extramural Jacquelyn Goldberg, JD CIRB Review Board Administrator Clinical Investigations Branch, CTEP Division of Cancer Treatment.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
Oncology Nursing Society Forming a new CHIP at the local level.
Measuring the Feasibility and Cost of PRO-CTCAE Implementation in Trials Presentation to NCI Stakeholders Based on work of the PRO-CTCAE Task 8 (Feasibility)
OEWG Kick-Off Meeting Meg Mooney, MD Chief, Clinical Investigations Branch CTEP, DCTD, NCI – March 24, 2010 CTEP & Cooperative Group Plans for OEWG Implementation:
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Sharon Stockman, C-CRC The University of Iowa Hospitals Iowa City, IA Chair, GOG Data Management.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
Slide 1 Community Networks to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities Pre-Application Conference May 26, 2004 Bethesda, MD Kenneth C. Chu, PhD Chief, Disparities.
The SNM Centralized IND & Clinical Trials Network Enabling Implementation Investigational & Approved PET Imaging in Large Multicenter Clinical Trials George.
Letters of Intent (LOIs) Through the NCI’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Dr. Patricia M. LoRusso, D.O. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State.
ROAD MAP: Getting a Cancer Study Done at Jefferson Sylvia O’Neill, MD Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Clinical Trials Office.
Enrollment and Monitoring Procedures for NCI Supported Clinical Trials Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
Role of the Drug Project Team in Formulating the Initial Development Plan of NCI-IND agents Jeff Moscow, MD IDB, CTEP.
Why Write A Grant? Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Director, Education and Training Division BU CTSI Section of General Internal.
Building a Research Core Road Map and Lessons Learned Scott A. LeMaire, MD Professor of Surgery and of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics Vice Chair for.
CTEP Visiting Physician Externship Coordinator: Igor Espinoza-Delgado, M.D. NCI CTEP Investigational Drug Branch
SARC Restructuring. SARC Strategic Plan  Mission  Given there is no successful structure in the US to provide platform to make progress in the diagnosis.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
ROAD MAP: Getting a Cancer Study Done at Jefferson Sylvia O’Neill, MD Associate Director of Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Clinical Trials Office.
Recent Studies Funded by the Progressive MS Alliance Tim Coetzee, PhD ACTRIMS 2016.
Using Australian Clinical Sites – Challenges for International Sponsors Prof A J (Tony) Webber Clinical Network Services Pty Ltd Brisbane, Australia.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
Opening An ETCTN Study at Your Site August Scope of this Presentation  This presentation applies to all sites which will be participating on.
11 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Clinical Trials Administration Sharon Hartson Stine, Director Group Administrator.
ROAD MAP: Getting a Cancer Study Done at Jefferson Meghan Wakefield,RN,CCRP Senior Director of Clinical Trials Office Clinical Research Organization.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
NMHIMSS Meet the Board & Committees May 26th, 2016
National Cancer Institute
AACR Genomics In Clinical Medicine Think Tank
Conducting Research at Essentia
Developing a Comprehensive Site Selection Process for a Cancer Network in a Resource-Limited Settings in Sub-Saharan Africa Meg Wirth AMC Operations &
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative Joint Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends.
S1400 OVERVIEW / BACKGROUND
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
From Bench to Clinical Applications: Money Talks
Ask the Experts Panel Compliance in Research August 10th, 2018
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
Understanding the alphabet soup from funding agencies
The Role of the Statistician in Protocol Development
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Welcome! We will begin shortly.
Clinical Trial Development: RA’s Role, OEWG, and IRB Submissions Martha Heckel Protocol Associate, ACRIN Dept. of Protocol Development & Regulatory.
CTSI Precision Health Initiative Pilot Award
Clinical Trial Development: NRG Processes and NCI Requirements
National Pediatric Critical Care Collaborative Research Network
Joan L. Walker, M.D. Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma
Patient Engagement through Social Media for Clinical Trials
Clinical Trial Development: NRG Processes and NCI Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Gynecologic Cancer Committee Clinical Trial Development

Gynecologic Cancer Committee Chair: Carol Aghajanian, MD Co Chairs: Paul DiSilvestro, MD & William Small, MD Translational Science Co-Chair: Heather Lankes, PhD Cervix/Vulvar Cancer Subcommittee Chair: Charles Leath, MD Co-Chair: Jyoti Mayadev, MD TS Co-Chair: Dmitriy Zamarin, MD, PhD Ovarian Cancer Subcommittee Chair: Kathleen Moore, MD Co-Chair: Robert Burger, MD TS Co-Chairs: Elizabeth Swisher, MD & Rebecca Arend, MD Rare Tumor Subcommittee Chair: Allan Covens, MD Co-Chair: Jubilee Brown, MD Uterine Corpus Cancer Subcommittee Chair: Matthew Powell, MD Co-Chair: Ann Klopp, MD TS Co-Chair: Douglas Levine, MD GYN Developmental Therapeutics Committee Chair: Roisin O’Cearbhaill, MD Co-Chair: Floortje Backes, MD TS Co-Chair: Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, MD, PhD GYN Phase I Subcommittee Chair: Russell Schilder, MD Co-Chair: Stephanie Gaillard, MD, PhD Translational Science Michael Birrer, MD, PhD

Submitting LOIs/Concepts to NRG Oncology Request for proposals broadcast prior to Semi-Annual Meetings “Proposals are to be submitted on the CTEP LOI submission form for any proposal targeting 97 patients or less or the CTEP concept submission form if targeting 98 or more patients.  Current versions of CTEP LOI submission form and concept submission form can be found at:  https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/lois_concepts.htm. Submit completed proposals to GYNconcepts@nrgoncology.org by *.”

Review of Submitted LOIs/Concepts LOI (< 97 patients) Concepts (> 98 patients) NRG Oncology Subcommittee GYN Cancer Committee NRG Oncology Research Strategy Committee CTEP LOI to PIO Protocol Review Committee (PRC) Industry Partner NRG Oncology Subcommittee GYN Cancer Committee NRG Oncology Research Strategy Committee Scientific Steering Committee (SSC)* Concept to PIO Task Force Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee (GCSC) Industry Partner Submission to RSC requires: LOI/concept, Accrual Checklist Form, NRG Review Form for dev concepts *https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccct/steering-committees

Types of Trials CTEP Supported NCTN Intervention Trials CTEP IND Agents (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/agents_drugs.htm) Study team prepares LOI (for trials with 97 or less patients) or concept submission form (for trials with 98 or more patients) https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/lois_concepts.htm Protocol Administrator (PA) submits LOI or concept submission form to PIO CTEP holds the IND CTEP (PMB) supplies and distributes experimental agent(s) Non-CTEP IND Agents Either the pharmaceutical company or NRG Oncology can hold the IND.  If NRG Oncology holds the IND, they cross file on the pharmaceutical company's IND. The pharmaceutical company is responsible for supply and distribution of the experimental agent(s).  They can supply/distribute themselves or contract with a 3rd party.  NRG Oncology does NOT have the infrastructure to distribute drugs. CTEP has to scientifically approve these studies.  This requires submission of LOI or concept submission form and IB for the agent(s).  Review of LOI or concept is the same as process for #1 above.

Letter of Intent (LOI) Types Project Team Member Applications (PTMA) -CrD PTMA -Replaced mass solicitation in March 2014 Unsolicited LOI -CrDL LOI CrDL = Career Development LOI

Career Development LOI (CrDL)* Eligibility Study chair (PI) should have a major interest in clinical research and the intention to develop a career in that field He/she should be within 7 years of completion of fellowship training He/she must be a faculty member (fellows may not serve as PIs on studies) at an institution with a successful track record in conducting cancer clinical trials Requirements Letter of commitment – NRG Oncology Group Chairs Letter of commitment from mentor Biosketch mentee (study chair/PI) AND mentor CrDL is for LOI only (NOT concepts)

PTMA replaces Mass Solicitation March 2014 Application by individuals for membership to project team LOI Drug development plan by project team occurs during CRADA negotiations Mass solicitation issued after CRADA negotiations completed Career Development PTMA (CrD PTMA) Applicant’s and Mentor’s NIH Biosketch Mentor Letter of Commitment NRG Oncology Letter of Commitment (Group Chair Letter) Only one mentor may be listed The mentor does not need to submit a separate PTMA If selected BOTH the CrD PTMA team member AND mentor will be required to attend all team meetings CRADA – Cooperative Research and Development Agreement

Request for PTMA Team members – Apply as Trials conducted in the ETCTN, CTEP brain tumor consortia, CITN or NCTN Clinical Scientist (Part A) Translational Scientist (biomarker development expert) (Part B) Basic Scientist (expert in mechanism of action of agent) (Part C) ETCTN – Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network CITN – Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network

Project Team 8-12 weeks Intramural and extramural co-chairs WebEx (no in person meetings) Attendance mandatory Non-participating members will be dropped for CrD applicants this includes your mentor Non-participating clinicians should not expect to have leadership roles in studies

NRG Oncology PTMA Process Project Team Announcements are broadcasted electronically by NCI CTEP PIO NRG Oncology (Protocol Development) in turn electronically broadcasts Project Team Announcements to entire membership Interested applicants should notify NRG Oncology leadership Research Strategy Committee Chair Disease Site Committee Chair and/or Non-Disease Site Scientific Committee Chair (DT and/or Translational Science) Copy Protocol Development Office (Francy Fonzi, Kia Neff, Nancy Soto) PTMA for individuals planning on conducting trials in NRG Oncology must be submitted by NRG Oncology Application is for individual (not LOI or concept submission form), so the usual Research Strategy Committee requirement of concept approval is not applicable Project team members leave process with requirement to submit LOI or Concept Submission Form (triggers OEWG deadline) and generate protocol LOI/Concept and protocol development is per usual NRG Oncology processes All correspondence with NCI must be submitted by NRG Oncology Protocol Development Office (LOI/Concept submission, protocol submission, etc.)

Unsolicited LOIs Before submitting unsolicited LOI (including CrDL), contact the IDB monitor(s) for the intended CTEP agent(s) to schedule a preliminary teleconference (TC) TC must be set up by NRG Oncology Protocol Administrator (PA) Sub-Committee/Committee Chair contact Kia Neff to set up TC (NeffK@nrgoncology.org) For CrDL LOI, both the mentor and mentee MUST participate in TC TC attendees: Study Chair/PI (mentee) Mentor Sub-Committee/Committee Chair +/- Co-Chair(s) +/- Translational Science representative(s) Representative from Protocol Administration (PA) NOTE: Statistician/SDC should NOT be included (statistician gets involved once go ahead is given by CTEP to develop and submit LOI) Unsolicited LOIs without a preliminary teleconference will be refused by CTEP

Review of LOIs/Concepts Reviewed by CTEP Protocol Review Committee (PRC)* CTEP approved LOIs are sent to the pharmaceutical collaborator for review and agent commitment (if applicable) Concepts Reviewed by NCI Scientific Steering Committee (Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee [GCSC]**) GCSC approved concepts are sent to the pharmaceutical collaborator (if applicable) for review and agent commitment *Reviewed by Biomarker Review Committee (BRC) if applicable **Review by Task force (Cervical Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Uterine Cancer) prior to GCSC submission is recommended (although not required)

Integral & Integrated Biomarkers Integral Studies Assays/tests that must be performed in order for the trial to proceed or to support the primary analysis. Integral studies are inherent to the design of the trial and must be performed on all participants, usually in real time. The assay/test must support one of the trial’s primary hypotheses. This includes: Tests to establish eligibility, randomization, stratification, or treatment assignment in a treatment, imaging, prevention or symptom science trial Functional imaging or molecular characterization linked to execution of primary analysis, such as non-reimbursable PET scans or biomarker evaluation Integrated Studies Intended to validate markers, imaging tests or tools, or QOL/PRO instruments for possible use as an integral biomarker in future trials or in clinical practice. Integrated studies should test a specific hypothesis with a preplanned statistical design, and are not hypothesis generating or exploratory. Integrated studies must be included in the protocol as a secondary objective. Real time (RT) integrated studies Non-real time (NRT) integrated studies

Biomarker Review Committee (BRC) LOIs require BRC review/approval if they include any of the following: Integral and/or integrated markers Requests for NCI funding for biomarker assays Requests for NCI funding for sample acquisition NOTE: Exploratory biomarkers that will not be funded by NCI will not undergo BRC review For LOI (NOT concepts)

For LOI (not concepts)

Biomarker, Imaging and Quality of Life Studies Funding Program BIQSFP BIQSFP Funding (NCTN/NCORP) Eligible trials are those conducted by NCTN Groups and NCORP Research Bases AND reviewed by NCI Steering committees: Randomized Phase 2 and Phase 3 NCTN treatment trials Randomized Phase 2 and Phase 3 NCORP cancer prevention clinical trials Randomized symptom science/supportive care clinical trials with efficacy endpoints Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) proposals (if part of randomized phase III trial) Application materials and instructions can be found at: https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccct/funding/biqsfp For concepts (NOT LOI)

Biomarker, Imaging and Quality of Life Studies Funding Program BIQSFP BIQSFP Funding (NCTN/NCORP) Integral Studies Submit with concept (review is concurrent) Real Time (RT) Integrated Studies Submit after concept approval Non-Real Time (NRT) Integrated Studies Submit between > 75% accrual to < 6 months after publication (abstract or manuscript) of primary endpoint (whichever occurs first) Application materials and instructions can be found at: https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccct/funding/biqsfp For concepts (NOT LOI)

Abbreviations AOH- Approval on Hold BIQSFP – Biomarker, Imaging, Quality of Life Studies Funding Program BRC – CTEP Biomarker Review Committee CIRB – NCI Central Investigational Review Board CRM – CTEP Concept Review Meeting CRR – Consensus Review Response CTEP – NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program DCP – NCI Division of Cancer Prevention GCSC – Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee HRC – Human Research Committee IDB – CTEP Investigational Drug Branch LOI – Letter of Intent NCI – National Cancer Institute NCORP – NCI Community Oncology Research Program NCTN – NCI National Clinical Trials Network OEWG – Operational Efficiency Working Group PIO – CTEP Protocol and Information Office PRC – CTEP Protocol Review Committee PRO – Patient Reported Outcomes/Quality of Life PSC – NRG Oncology Protocol Support Committee PTMA – Project Team Member Application RSC – NRG Oncology Research Strategy Committee Task Forces – Cervical Cancer (CTF), Ovarian Cancer (OTF), Uterine Cancer (UTF) TC – Teleconference TS –Translational Science