IME634: Management Decision Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modellistica e Gestione dei Sistemi Ambientali A tool for multicriteria analysis: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Chiara Mocenni University of.
Advertisements

Multicriteria Decision-Making Models
SUSTAINABILITY MCDM MODEL COMPARISONS
Clustering Categorical Data The Case of Quran Verses
O(N 1.5 ) divide-and-conquer technique for Minimum Spanning Tree problem Step 1: Divide the graph into  N sub-graph by clustering. Step 2: Solve each.
Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Systems to Prioritize and Compare their Methods with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Hamid Reza Feili *,
1 1 Slide Chapter 10 Multicriteria Decision Making n A Scoring Model for Job Selection n Spreadsheet Solution of the Job Selection Scoring Model n The.
CLUSTERING PROXIMITY MEASURES
Data Clustering Methods
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
Cluster Analysis (1).
MENENTUKAN LOKASI PABRIK YANG IDEAL MENGGUNAKAN AHP PERTEMUAN 12.
Introduction to Management Science
1 Multi-Criteria Decision Making MCDM Approaches.
Clustering Ram Akella Lecture 6 February 23, & 280I University of California Berkeley Silicon Valley Center/SC.
MADM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Group Technology and Facility Layout
Clustering Unsupervised learning Generating “classes”
Constructing the Decision Model Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
METU Informatics Institute Min 720 Pattern Classification with Bio-Medical Applications PART 2: Statistical Pattern Classification: Optimal Classification.
9-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Multicriteria Decision Making
9-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
ELearning / MCDA Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Introduction to Value Tree Analysis eLearning resources / MCDA team Director.
Principles of Pattern Recognition
Groups of models Intra-Enterprise Planning Enterprise Planning itself Single Facility Location Models Multiple Facility Location Models.
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
Multi-Criteria Decision Making by: Mehrdad ghafoori Saber seyyed ali
USAGE OF AHP AND TOPSIS METHOD FOR REGIONAL DISPARITIES EVALUATION IN VISEGRAD COUNTRIES EVA POLEDNÍKOVÁ, VŠB-TU OSTRAVA LIBEREC,
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Founded by Saaty in It is a popular and widely used method for multi-criteria.
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Types of Data How to Calculate Distance? Dr. Ryan Benton January 29, 2009.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
Analyzing the Problem (SAW, WP, TOPSIS) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Definition Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from (or unrelated to)
DATA INTEGRATION TECHNIQUES WITH APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH SCIENCES BKSinha Ex-Faculty, ISI, Kolkata April 17, 2012.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
CLUSTER ANALYSIS. Cluster Analysis  Cluster analysis is a major technique for classifying a ‘mountain’ of information into manageable meaningful piles.
Ashish Das Indian Institute of Technology Bombay India.
Tools for Decision Analysis: Analysis of Risky Decisions
Reality of Highway Construction Equipment in Palestine
Strategy Analysis and choice Chapter Six
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
A Scoring Model for Job Selection
Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS
Haim Kaplan and Uri Zwick
Decision Matrices Business Economics.
Supplement: Decision Making
Presented by Rich Goyette
Multidimensional Scaling and Correspondence Analysis
VLFM606: Data Analysis and Decision Making
TABLE 14-1 Job Offer Selection Problem
Estimation Error and Portfolio Optimization
MULTIDIMENSIONAL RANKING
Conjoint Analysis.
Estimation Error and Portfolio Optimization
Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Nearest Neighbors CSC 576: Data Mining.
Facilities Planning and Design Course code:
Multicriteria Decision Making
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Correspondence Analysis
AHP (Analytic Hierarchy process)
Presentation transcript:

IME634: Management Decision Analysis Raghu Nandan Sengupta Industrial & Management Department Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was developed for the INTEGRated Human Exploration Mission Simulation FaciliTY (INTEGRITY) project in the Johnson Space Centre to assess the priority of a set of human spaceflight mission simulators TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS (contd…) One assumes utility function is monotonic, in the sense the more/less you get more/less you want The basic premise based on which TOPSIS works is the fact that selected alternatives should have the shortest distance from the positive-ideal solution, and the farthest distance from the negative-ideal solution TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS (contd…) Choose positive ideal solution (PIS) of the original ranking problem Choose negative ideal solution (NIS) of the original ranking problem Find distances from each decisions/alternatives, 𝐴 𝑖 , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 to PIS, which is given as 𝑑 𝐴 𝑖 ,𝑃𝐼𝑆 Find distances from each decisions/alternatives, 𝐴 𝑖 , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 to NIS which is given as 𝑑 𝐴 𝑖 ,𝑁𝐼𝑆 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS (contd…) Euclidean distance measure is used and we ensure our main motivation is to minimize the dispersion Calculate 𝑟 𝑖 = 𝑑 𝐴 𝑖 ,𝑁𝐼𝑆 𝑑 𝐴 𝑖 ,𝑁𝐼𝑆 +𝑑 𝐴 𝑖 ,𝑃𝐼𝑆 = 𝐴 𝑖 −𝑁𝐼𝑆 2 𝐴 𝑖 −𝑁𝐼𝑆 2 + 𝐴 𝑖 −𝑃𝐼𝑆 2 The basic premise being Euclidean distance portrays the concept of utility function, 𝑈 𝑊 which is quadratic TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS (contd…) Minimizing 𝑈 𝑊 ensures minimizing dispersion, i.e., minimization of 𝑉𝑎𝑟 𝑋 One ranks the ratios, 𝑟 𝑖 , to get the best alternative TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA Algorithm for TOPSIS Assume decisions/alternatives as 𝐴 𝑖 , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 Assume attributes/decision criteria/goals are 𝐶 𝑗 , 𝑗=1,⋯,𝑛 We state the pseudo-codes for the working principle of TOPSIS TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

Algorithm for TOPSIS (contd…) 1: DEFINE: 𝑿 𝑚×𝑛 (matrix consisting of priority scores assigned to decisions/alternatives), 𝐴 𝑖 ,based on attributes/decision criteria/goals, 𝐶 𝑗 ; 𝑤 𝑗 (weight for the attributes/decision criteria/goals) such that 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑤 𝑗 =1;𝑩 (benefit matrix);𝑪 (cost matrix); 𝑟 𝑖,𝑗 = 𝑥 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑖,𝑗 2 ; 𝐴𝐼𝑆= 𝑣 1 + ,⋯, 𝑣 𝑚 + = max ∀𝑖 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 𝑗∈𝑩 , min ∀𝑖 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 𝑗∈𝑪 (negative ideal solution);𝑃𝐼𝑆= 𝑣 1 − ,⋯, 𝑣 𝑚 − = min ∀𝑖 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 𝑗∈𝑩 , max ∀𝑖 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 𝑗∈𝑪 (positive ideal solution); 𝑆 𝑖 + = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 + 2 ; 𝑆 𝑖 − = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 − 2 ; 𝑇 𝑖 = 𝑆 𝑖 − 𝑆 𝑖 + + 𝑆 𝑖 − (relative closeness);𝑀= 𝑆 𝑖 + , 𝑆 𝑖 − (separation measure). Here 𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 and 𝑗=1,⋯,𝑛 2: INPUT: 𝑿 𝑚×𝑛 (matrix consisting of priority scores assigned to decisions/alternatives), 𝐴 𝑖 ,based on attributes/decision criteria/goals, 𝐶 𝑗 ; 𝑤 𝑗 (weight for the attributes/decision criteria/goals) such that 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑤 𝑗 =1;𝑩 (benefit matrix);𝑪 (cost matrix). Here 𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 and 𝑗=1,⋯,𝑛 3: START if: 𝑖=1:𝑚 4: START if: 𝑗=1:𝑛 5: CALCULATE: 𝑟 𝑖,𝑗 = 𝑥 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑖,𝑗 2 ; 𝑣 𝑖,𝑗 = 𝑤 𝑗 𝑟 𝑖,𝑗 where 𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 and 𝑗=1,⋯,𝑛 6: END if 7: END if 8: CALCULATE: 𝑣 𝑖 + ; 𝑣 𝑖 − ;𝐴𝐼𝑆;𝑃𝐼𝑆; 𝑆 𝑖 + ; 𝑆 𝑖 − ; 𝑀; 𝑇 𝑖 9: REPORT: 𝐴𝐼𝑆;𝑃𝐼𝑆;𝑀; 𝑇 𝑖 10: END TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS (contd…): Distance measure The Euclidean distance between vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯, 𝑦 𝑛 is 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑦 𝑖 2 1 2 The 𝐿 1 norm or Manhattan distance between vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯, 𝑦 𝑛 is 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑦 𝑖 . The name relates to the distance a taxi has to drive in a rectangular street grid Mahalanobis distance between random vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯, 𝑦 𝑛 is 𝒙−𝒚 𝑇 𝑺 −1 𝒙−𝒚 , where 𝑺 is the covariance matrix TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS (contd…): Distance measure The Hamming distance between vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯, 𝑦 𝑛 is the number of positions at which the corresponding values are different The 𝐿 ∞ norm between vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯,𝑦 is max ∀𝑖 𝑦 𝑖 − 𝑦 𝑖 The 𝐿 𝑝 norm between vector/points 𝒙= 𝑥 1 ,⋯, 𝑥 𝑛 and 𝒚= 𝑦 1 ,⋯, 𝑦 𝑛 is 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑦 𝑖 𝑝 1 𝑝 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Step # 01 (Construct the normalized decision matrix) Assume the decision matrix, 𝑿= 𝑥 11 ⋯ 𝑥 1𝑛 ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ 𝑥 𝑚1 ⋯ 𝑥 𝑚𝑛 Convert the entries in X into scaled normalized values, 𝑟 𝑖𝑗 = 𝑥 𝑖𝑗 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘𝑗 2 , which has no dimension Thus we get 𝑹= 𝑟 11 ⋯ 𝑟 1𝑛 ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ 𝑟 𝑚1 ⋯ 𝑟 𝑚𝑛 = 𝑥 11 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘1 2 ⋯ 𝑥 1𝑛 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘𝑛 2 ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ 𝑥 𝑚1 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘1 2 ⋯ 𝑥 𝑚𝑛 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘𝑛 2 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Step # 01 (Construct the normalized decision matrix) (contd..) Assume, 𝑿= 10 05 15 20 25 15 25 30 25 35 40 30 30 40 45 35 15 10 10 05 Scale the values using normalization concept, i.e., 𝑟 𝑖𝑗 = 𝑥 𝑖𝑗 𝑘=1 𝑚 𝑥 𝑘𝑗 2 (you can use any other concept of utility also) 𝑹= 10 100+25+225+400 5 100+25+225+400 15 100+25+225+400 20 100+25+225+400 625 625+225+625+900 225 625+225+625+900 625 625+225+625+900 900 625+225+625+900 625 625+1225+1600+900 1225 625+1225+1600+900 1600 625+1225+1600+900 900 625+1225+1600+900 900 900+1600+2025+1225 1600 900+1600+2025+1225 2025 900+1600+2025+1225 1225 900+1600+2025+1225 225 225+100+100+25 100 225+100+100+25 100 225+100+100+25 25 225+100+100+25 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Step # 01 (Construct the normalized decision matrix) (contd..) 𝑹= 0.133333 0.033333 0.300000 0.533333 0.263158 0.094737 0.263158 0.378947 0.143678 0.281609 0.367816 0.206897 0.156522 0.278261 0.352174 0.213043 0.500000 0.222222 0.222222 0.055556 Check each column adds up to 1 as it should be TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Step # 02 (Construct the weighted normalized decision matrix) If the decision maker decides on the set of weights, depending on his/her preference, then the weight, 𝑾= 𝑤 1 ⋯ 0 ⋮ ⋱ ⋮ 0 ⋯ 𝑤 𝑛 , such that 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑤 = 1 Consider, 𝑾= 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 Calculate 𝑽=𝑹𝑾 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 02 (Construct the weighted normalized decision matrix) (contd..) Thus 𝑽=𝑹𝑾= 0.133333 0.033333 0.300000 0.533333 0.263158 0.094737 0.263158 0.378947 0.143678 0.281609 0.367816 0.206897 0.156522 0.278261 0.352174 0.213043 0.500000 0.222222 0.222222 0.055556 × 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 Hence 𝑽=𝑹𝑾= 𝑣 11 𝑣 12 𝑣 13 𝑣 14 𝑣 21 𝑣 22 𝑣 23 𝑣 24 𝑣 31 𝑣 32 𝑣 33 𝑣 34 𝑣 41 𝑣 42 𝑣 43 𝑣 44 𝑣 51 𝑣 52 𝑣 53 𝑣 54 = 0.026667 0.006667 0.060000 0.106667 0.026316 0.009474 0.026316 0.037895 0.021552 0.042241 0.055172 0.031034 0.039130 0.069565 0.088043 0.053261 0.150000 0.066667 0.066667 0.016667 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 03 (Determine the most positive-ideal, most negative-ideal solutions) Calculate 𝑽 + which is most positive ideal solution Where 𝑽 + = max 𝑖 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 𝑗∈𝐽 ,𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 = 𝑣 1 + , 𝑣 2 + ,⋯, 𝑣 𝑛 + TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 03 (Determine the most positive-ideal, most negative-ideal solutions) Calculate 𝑽 − which is most negative ideal solution Where 𝑽 − = min 𝑖 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 𝑗∈𝐽 ,𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 = 𝑣 1 − , 𝑣 2 − ,⋯, 𝑣 𝑛 − TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 04 (Calculate the distance based on most positive-ideal, most negative-ideal solutions) Calculate 𝑆 𝑖 + based on most positive ideal solution Where 𝑆 𝑖 + = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 + 2 , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 04 (Calculate the distance based on most positive-ideal, most negative-ideal solutions) Calculate 𝑆 𝑖 − based on most negative ideal solution Where 𝑆 𝑖 − = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 − 2 , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Step # 05 (Calculate the relative proximity based on ideal solution) Calculate 𝑐 𝑖 = 𝑆 𝑖 − 𝑆 𝑖 − + 𝑆 𝑖 + , 𝑖= 1,⋯,𝑚 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA TOPSIS: Example Consider the problem related to buying a house/apartment among four (04) choices, where the decision to buy the house/apartment is based on eleven (11) different parameters/criterion which are City Price Loan availability/conditions Location Number of rooms Safety Proximity to markets Proximity to schools Proximity to hospitals Facilities available Resale condition TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) 𝑿= 45.5 50.0 40.0 41.7 40.0 33.3 42.9 25.0 66.7 83.3 62.5 77.8 09.2 08.5 06.8 10.6 1.8 1.5 1.3 2.3 0.0 1.3 0.8 1.8 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.9 2.3 2.4 1.2 3.0 1.6 2.4 1.8 3.2 4.8 3.3 4.2 3.8 3.1 1.6 2.2 1.3 Use the normalization formulae as , 𝑟 𝑖𝑗 = 𝑥 𝑖𝑗 𝑘=1 𝑛 𝑥 𝑖𝑘 2 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) 𝑹= 0.5116 0.5622 0.4498 0.4689 0.5561 0.4629 0.5964 0.3475 0.4565 0.5701 0.4278 0.5325 0.5180 0.4785 0.3828 0.5968 0.5097 0.4248 0.3681 0.6513 0.0000 0.5508 0.3390 0.7627 0.5647 0.0000 0.0000 0.8253 0.4961 0.5177 0.2589 0.6471 0.3427 0.5140 0.3855 0.6854 0.5908 0.4062 0.5169 0.4677 0.7169 0.3700 0.5087 0.3006 For example 𝑟 3,2 = 42.9 40.0 2 + 42.9 2 + 62.5 2 + 6.8 2 + 1.3 2 + 0.8 2 + 0.0 2 + 1.2 2 + 1.8 2 + 4.2 2 + 2.2 2 =0.5964 𝑟 4,8 = 3.0 41.7 2 + 25 2 + 77.8 2 + 10.6 2 + 2.3 2 + 1.8 2 + 1.9 2 + 3.0 2 + 3.2 2 + 3.8 2 + 1.3 2 =0.6471 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Consider 𝑾= (0.119, 0.106, 0.115, 0.090, 0.113, 0.061, 0.064, 0.113, 0.096, 0.065, 0.058), where 𝑗=1 𝑛=11 𝑤 𝑗 = 0.119+0.106+0.115+0.090+0.113+0.061+0.064+0.113+0.096+0.065+0.058 0.119+0.106+0.115+0.090+0.113+0.061+0.064+0.113+0.096+0.065+0.058 =1 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) 𝐕= 0.0609 0.0669 0.0535 0.0558 0.0589 0.0491 0.0632 0.0368 0.0525 0.0656 0.0493 0.0613 0.0466 0.0430 0.0331 0.0586 0.0576 0.0480 0.0416 0.0736 0.0000 0.0336 0.0207 0.0446 0.0361 0.0000 0.0000 0.0528 0.0545 0.0569 0.0427 0.0758 0.0358 0.0493 0.0370 0.0658 0.0385 0.0265 0.0337 0.0304 0.0417 0.0215 0.0295 0.0117 For example v 2,11 = 0.5622 0.4629 0.5701 0.4785 0.4248 0.5508 0.0000 0.5177 0.5140 0.4062 0.3700 × 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.058 =0.0215 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Calculate V+=(0.0669, 0.0632, 0.0656, 0.0586, 0.0736, 0.0446, 0.0528, 0.0758, 0.0658, 0.0385, 0.0417), where 𝐕 + = max i v ij j∈J ,i=1,⋯,m = v 1 + , v 2 + ,⋯, v n + v 1 + =max 0.0609,0.0669,0.0535,0.0558 =0.0669 v 2 + =max 0.0589,0.0491,0.0632,0.0368 =0.0632 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Calculate V-=(0.0535, 0.0368 , 0.0493, 0.0331, 0.0416, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0427, 0.0358, 0.0265, 0.0117), where 𝐕 − = min 𝑖 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 𝑗∈𝐽 ,𝑖=1,⋯,𝑚 = 𝑣 1 − , 𝑣 2 − ,⋯, 𝑣 𝑛 − v 1 − =min 0.0609,0.0669,0.0535,0.0558 =0.0535 v 2 − =min 0.0589,0.0491,0.0632,0.0368 =0.0368 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Calculate the distance of each project to most positive ideal solution using 𝑆 𝑖 + = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 + 2 , thus 𝑆 1 + =0.1045 𝑆 2 + =0.1543 𝑆 3 + =0.0870 𝑆 4 + =0.0425 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Calculate the distance of each project to most negative ideal solution using 𝑆 𝑖 − = 𝑗=1 𝑛 𝑣 𝑖𝑗 − 𝑣 𝑗 − 2 , thus 𝑆 1 1 =0.0589 𝑆 2 − =0.0477 𝑆 3 − =0.0387 𝑆 4 − =0.0928 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Calculate the relative proximity index of each alternative (which is buying the house/apartment) to the ideal solution according to formula 𝑐 𝑖 = 𝑆 𝑖 − 𝑆 𝑖 − + 𝑆 𝑖 + , thus 𝑐 1 = 0.0589 0.0589+0.1045 =0.3605 𝑐 2 = 0.0477 0.0477+0.1543 =0.2361 𝑐 3 = 0.0387 0.0387+0.0870 =0.3078 𝑐 3 = 0.0928 0.0928+0.0425 =0.6853 TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA

TOPSIS: Example (contd..) Thus the ranking is 𝑐 4 ≻ 𝑐 1 > 𝑐 3 > 𝑐 2 Hence Alternative # 04 is the best (position # 01) choice followed by Alternative # 01 (position # 02), then by Alternative # 03 (position # 03) and finally followed by Alternative # 02 (position # 04) TOPSIS RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT Kanpur,INDIA