University-based K-12 teacher education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
Entrepreneurial Leadership in STEM Teaching and Learning EnLiST Developing Entrepreneurial Teacher Leaders Presenters: Jeanne Koehler, Raymond Price, and.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.
CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING A national network of 25 research universities committed to using graduate education to.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
1 Higher Education Engagement with K-12: Partnerships, Possibilities, and Pitfalls Nancy S. Shapiro Office of Academic Affairs University System of Maryland.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
STEM INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK ASTE January 2014 San Antonio, TX ASTE January 2014 San Antonio, TX DRS. Andrea Burrows, Tim Slater, Mike Borowczak, and Ms.
Culturally Responsive Middle School Science A case study of needs, demands, and challenges.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Activities Reporting Frequency tabulations Types of activities Target audiences Participants Synthesis of descriptions Evaluation summaries.
David Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University April 8, 2015 Webinar SAGE/GAGE FACILITIES SUPPORTING BROADER EDUCATIONAL IMPACTS: SOME CONTEXTS.
May 30, 2015 Central Washington University THE NEXT GENERATION OF STEM TEACHER PREPARATION IN WASHINGTON STATE.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
National Study of Education in Undergraduate Science: – What Was Learned Dennis Sunal, Cynthia Szymanski Sunal, Erika Steele, Donna Turner The.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
Integrate English as a Second Language (ESL) strategies into the teacher preparation program for all students the semester prior to student teaching. Require.
Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI): Case Studies of 8 “Exemplar” Inclusive STEM-focused High Schools This work was conducted.
STEM is gathering Steam!!!
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
On the Cutting Edge A Professional Development Program for Current and Future Geoscience Faculty Heather Macdonald Cathy Manduca Dave Mogk Barb Tewksbury.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
Transforming Geoscience Preparation for K-8 Pre-Service Teachers at St. Norbert College.
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Defeating the Many-Headed Monster: Strategies for Effective Comprehensive Program Evaluation Joseph B. Berger School of Education University of Massachusetts.
Engineering and Education Partnership: Preparing the Next Generation of Cross Disciplinary Trained STEM Teachers Dr. Michael de Miranda School of Education.
Stimulating Research and Innovation for Preservice Education of STEM Teachers in High-Need Schools W. James Lewis Deputy Assistant Director, Education.
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
STEM Education Workshop
Broadening Participation through K-12 and Community Partnerships
COSEE Network Evaluation
Board on science education
Emporia State University
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
Craig T. Gabler KDSL Global Science Specialist
WG 10: Research on Institutional Change and Faculty Professional Development, TA training Grand Challenge Goals How to most effectively/efficiently promote.
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
The California Next Generation Science Standards
Chapter 13 Career Development Services for K-12 Students
InTeGrate supports integrated interdisciplinary learning about resource and environmental issues across the undergraduate curriculum to create a sustainable.
Teaching and Learning Goals
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
Please pick-up your name badge and sit at any table.
Maia Binding, SEPUP, Lawrence Hall of Science
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Categories
Teaching Climate Science to Elementary School Students using the NGSS
Cathy Manduca, SERC Earth Educators Rendezvous 2017
InTeGrate supports integrated interdisciplinary learning about resource and environmental issues across the undergraduate curriculum to create a sustainable.
Connecting the GER Toolbox to Community Research Priorities
Working with your Colleagues to Effect Change
How well do you know the new science standards?
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Leadership for Safety Through the Case Method
Defining and Measuring Teacher Effectiveness
Research on Geoscience Learning
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) for Elementary Teachers
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Pedagogical Content Knowledge – Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

University-based K-12 teacher education Geoscience Research and Information Needs for Supporting and Improving K-12 ESS Teacher Education Kim Cheek, University of North Florida (k.cheek@unf.edu); Heather Petcovic, Western Michigan University; Jason Cervenec, Ohio State University; Robyn Dahl, Western Washington University; and Nancy Price, Portland State University Grand Challenge 3: How do we best prepare future and practicing K-12 teachers to engage in ESS to promote three-dimensional learning that involves the integration of disciplinary core ideas, science and engineering practices and crosscutting concepts? Grand Challenge I: How do we attract and support a greater number of future K-12 ESS teachers who represent and can effectively engage diverse K-12 learners? Grand Challenge 2: What are effective models for incorporating ESS into undergraduate K-12 teacher preparation and in providing professional development for inservice teachers The GER Community Framework Project The GER Community Framework Project is an NSF-funded project that engaged over 200 geoscience educators and researchers over a series of face-to-face and virtual events to develop priorities for future GER questions spanning 10 geoscience education research themes one of which is ESS teacher preparation. Figure 1 shows the relatively low percentage of secondary teachers who are adequately prepared to teach ESS. The situation is even more acute at the elementary level. Major external factors that impact ESS teacher preparation can be found in Figure 2. .Working Group 3 was charged with identifying Grand Challenges and recommendations for undergraduate ESS teacher preparation, but ncludes some recommendations for teacher professional development. Recommended Research Strategies Recommended Research Strategies Recommended Research Strategies Systematic literature reviews to establish why individuals become ESS teachers and to identify strategies for attracting underrepresented populations to ESS teaching Survey of teacher preparation institutions focused on recruitment of diverse populations to ESS teaching Review and synthesis of existing literature on factors that support the transition from preservice to inservice ESS teaching Identification of barriers and attractors to K-12 ESS teaching for underrepresented populations Investigation of whether institutions with that employ reformed teaching practices attract and support a more diverse pool of K-12 preservice ESS teachers than institutions with more traditional courses Longitudinal phenomenological research to determine what factors contribute to thriving as an ESS teacher in the first few years of teaching Identify and evaluate existing models of teacher preparation and professional development to determine the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) needed by elementary, middle, and/or high school ESS teachers Identify and evaluate alternate teacher preparation pathways Define the specific PCK needed by teachers of ESS in elementary, middle, and high school, including for teaching special needs and underrepresented groups Engage in collaborative research with other science education organizations Identify successful P-16 partnerships for ESS teacher preparation Develop a methodology or tool for evaluating ESS teacher preparation and professional development programs and models Longitudinal phenomenological research to determine the long-term success of graduates of ESS teacher preparation programs Identify teacher education models that promote 3-dimensional thinking in ESS teachers, particularly as it relates to teacher expertise with the science and engineering practices (SEPs) Review the literature on available assessments for measuring the three-dimensionality of classroom instruction as it applies to ESS instructional models Research that connects the effectiveness of conceptual change instructional approaches to 3-dimensional learning University-based K-12 teacher education Program: Format: Graduate program Post-baccalaureate program References Petcovic, H., Cervenec, J., Cheek, K., Dahl, R., & Price, N. Research on Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Earth and Space Sciences Teacher Education. In St. John, K. (Ed.) (2018). A Community Framework for Geoscience Education Research. National Association of Geoscience Teachers. Retrieved from http://commons. lib.jmu.edu/ger_framework/15 Wilson, C. (2016). Status of the Geoscience Workforce 2016. American Geosciences Institute. Retrieved from https://www.americangeosciences.org/workforce/reports/status-report Fig. 1. Percentage of secondary STEM teachers prepared in the geosciences. Reproduced from Wilson, 2016) Fig. 2. A generalized conceptual model of university-based K-12 teacher education in ESS and key external factors that impact undergraduate teacher preparation and make it a complex and dynamic enterprise. Research Grand Challenges and recommended strategies were developed for undergraduate ESS teacher preparation but include some recommendations for teacher professional development.