Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Genetic Consequences of Programmed Genome Rearrangement
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Jianbin Wang, H. Christina Fan, Barry Behr, Stephen R. Quake  Cell 
Laurel B. Bender, Ru Cao, Yi Zhang, Susan Strome  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
A Hypervariable Invertebrate Allodeterminant
A Tumor Sorting Protocol that Enables Enrichment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells and Facilitation of Genetic Analyses  Zachary S. Boyd, Rajiv Raja,
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Recombination between Palindromes P5 and P1 on the Human Y Chromosome Causes Massive Deletions and Spermatogenic Failure  Sjoerd Repping, Helen Skaletsky,
Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Bryan W. Heck, Danelle Devenport  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Arc expression increases H4K12Ac levels.
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Gene Amplification: Trophoblast Giant Cells Use All the Tricks
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Doris Bachtrog, Nicholas R.T. Toda, Steven Lockton  Current Biology 
Sonal S. Joshi, Victoria H. Meller  Current Biology 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
RNA Sequencing of Stentor Cell Fragments Reveals Transcriptional Changes during Cellular Regeneration  Henning Onsbring, Mahwash Jamy, Thijs J.G. Ettema 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Conserved Histone Variant H2A
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Highly Punctuated Patterns of Population Structure on the X Chromosome and Implications for African Evolutionary History  Charla A. Lambert, Caitlin F.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
E2a Is Necessary for Smad2/3-Dependent Transcription and the Direct Repression of lefty during Gastrulation  Andrea E. Wills, Julie C. Baker  Developmental.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Increased DNA Methylation at the AXIN1 Gene in a Monozygotic Twin from a Pair Discordant for a Caudal Duplication Anomaly  N.A. Oates, J. van Vliet, D.L.
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Genomic Analysis of Gastrulation and Organogenesis in the Mouse
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (January 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Shadow Enhancers Foster Robustness of Drosophila Gastrulation
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
The Origin of Centrosomes in Parthenogenetic Hymenopteran Insects
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
The 3D Genome in Transcriptional Regulation and Pluripotency
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast
Mutational Analysis of Ionizing Radiation Induced Neoplasms
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations.
Presentation transcript:

Selective Amplification of the Genome Surrounding Key Placental Genes in Trophoblast Giant Cells  Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 230-236 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2016 26, 230-236DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The TGC Genome Contains Amplified Regions (A) Schematic of an E9.5 conceptus. Pink, decidua; gray, placental disk and embryo; yellow, p-TGCs. Embryonically derived p-TGCs surround the entire border between embryonic and maternal tissue (decidua). p-TGCs of the polar trophectoderm are adjacent to the other trophoblast cells within the placental disk, whereas p-TGCs of the mural trophectoderm are adjacent to Reichert’s membrane. p-TGCs of the mural trophectoderm were used for this study. (B) Plot comparing position along chromosome 13 (top) and chromosome 6 (bottom) to the normalized log2 (NLog2) ratio of sequence coverage of p-TGCs versus embryos for five individuals. Arrowheads indicate amplified regions called by BIC-seq [13] in all five WGS samples with a log10 p value < −250. UR: UR domains, which are more prominent than the amplified regions. See Figure S1 for all autosomes and Table S1 for coordinates, percent amplification, and exact p values for amplified regions. Current Biology 2016 26, 230-236DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Genes Contained within Amplified Regions (A) Each amplified region contains a family of genes, the prolactins (both mini and big clusters), serpins, and cathepsins, as well as the NK/CLEC complex. Amplified genes in these families are in bold text, neighboring genes that are not in these families but are within the amplified regions are in normal (black) text, and members of the NK/CLEC complex that are not in the amplified region are in gray text. See Table S1 for genes in table format. (B) ddPCR for the big prolactin and serpin amplified regions. Ratio of positive droplets, indicating copy level, in test versus control regions is shown for biological triplicates (each replicate consists of DNA from p-TGCs from one placenta and their cognate embryo); error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. Left: compared to embryos, p-TGCs have significantly fewer copies of UR domains (p < 0.05). Middle: p-TGCs have significantly more copies of amplified regions in the big prolactin loci (p < 0.05) and similar copy levels in the flanking regions (Nrsn1 and Sox4). In addition, the region in the middle of the loci (Prl8a8 and Prl8a1) has a more significant difference between p-TGC and embryonic samples (p ≤ 0.005), corresponding to a larger degree of amplification, than those near the edges of the clusters (Prl3b1, Prl8a6, and Prl5a1; p < 0.05). Right: p-TGCs have significantly more copies of amplified regions in the middle of the serpin loci (p < 0.05) and similar copy levels in the flanking region (Foxf2). In addition, the region in the middle of the loci (Serb6b and Serb9d) has a more significant difference between p-TGC and embryonic samples (p ≤ 0.005), corresponding to a larger degree of amplification, than those near the edges of the clusters (Serb6d; p < 0.05; and Serb6a, which, although trending toward amplification, was not significantly amplified). In the middle and right panels, bold red text with solid black bar beneath indicates genes in the amplified loci, whereas black text with dashed bar underneath indicates genes flanking the amplified loci. Current Biology 2016 26, 230-236DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Amplified Regions Are Enriched for Highly Expressed Genes and Associated Enhancers (A) Expression levels of the 100 most highly expressed genes on chromosome 13. Amplified genes are in yellow. 23 of these highly expressed genes, including the top two, are in amplified regions (p < 0.0002). b-Prl, big prolactin cluster; m-Prl, mini-prolactin cluster; Serp, serpin cluster; Cath, cathepsin cluster. See Table S2 for a list of the 100 most highly expressed genes on chromosome 13. (B and C) Integrative Genomics Viewer screenshots of the amplified loci, showing location of putative enhancer elements (both H3K4Me1 and H3K27Ac enrichment). Red arrows and box indicate enhancers. (B) Whereas the big prolactin locus has one putative enhancer in the middle of the cluster (left, red box), the other loci, such as the mini prolactin locus (right), have many putative enhancers (red arrows). See (C) for the NK/CLEC complex and Figure S2 for the serpin and cathepsin amplified loci. Prolactin genes in red are in the 100 most highly expressed genes on chromosome 13 in p-TGCs. These genes are not in closer proximity to the big enhancer (red box) than the other genes in this cluster. (C) For the NK/CLEC complex, the putative enhancers are concentrated around the CLEC genes (in red), many of which are expressed in p-TGCs, but not around the NK genes, which are not expressed. Current Biology 2016 26, 230-236DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Amplified Regions Are Formed Coincidentally with Endoreplication and Are Not Dependent on Replication Timing (A) E9.5 p-TGC DNA replication patterns. Top row: field of view of p-TGC nuclei displaying early (E) and late (L) S phase patterns of EdU incorporation (scale bar, 75 μm). Middle and bottom rows: subsets of nuclei seen in the top row. Middle row (Early): p-TGC nuclei displaying the early S phase replication pattern, in which most of the p-TGC nucleus is labeled with EdU, except for heterochromatic foci (dense blue DAPI staining). Bottom row (Late): p-TGC nuclei displaying the late S phase replication pattern, in which labeling consists of heterochromatic foci and DNA at the periphery of the nucleus. DAPI marking the entire nucleus is in diffuse blue; DAPI marking heterochromatic foci is in dense blue (arrowheads). EdU is in red. (B) ddPCR on Rif1−/− and control p-TGCs and cognate embryos, demonstrating that UR domains, but not amplified regions, are dependent on replication timing. Ratio of positive droplets in test versus control regions is shown for biological triplicates (each experiment consisted of DNA from p-TGCs from one placenta and their cognate embryo); error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. Prl8a8 and Serb9d are within amplified regions, Chr3 and Chr14 regions are within UR domains, and Sox4 is in a control regularly (Reg) replicated region that flanks the big prolactin amplified region. Current Biology 2016 26, 230-236DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.060) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions